From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Jonathan Austin <jonathan.austin@arm.com>
Cc: "Ming Lei" <tom.leiming@gmail.com>,
"Michal Marek" <mmarek@suse.cz>,
"Rusty Russell" <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
"Axel Lin" <axel.lin@ingics.com>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: kernel BUG at kernel/kallsyms.c:222!
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 19:32:36 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131111193236.GB16735@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <528110B1.4060402@arm.com>
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 05:15:29PM +0000, Jonathan Austin wrote:
> I've tested the patch below and it solves the ARM side of things - so
> gives you an option other than a complete revert. Happy to put this in to
> RMK's patch system if you'd prefer not to have to revert and he's happy
> with the patch.
I think this is the right solution because it then means that this symbol
has the same meaning whether on MMU or !MMU - and getting rid of these
kinds of gratuitous variances are the only way that !MMU is going to
become less fragile.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-11 19:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-07 1:53 Axel Lin
2013-11-07 2:04 ` Ming Lei
2013-11-07 2:18 ` Axel Lin
2013-11-07 2:36 ` Ming Lei
2013-11-07 2:47 ` Axel Lin
2013-11-07 4:37 ` Ming Lei
2013-11-07 8:36 ` Axel Lin
2013-11-07 23:44 ` Rusty Russell
2013-11-08 0:45 ` Ming Lei
2013-11-08 4:20 ` Axel Lin
2013-11-08 7:13 ` Ming Lei
2013-11-11 0:23 ` Rusty Russell
2013-11-11 6:43 ` Axel Lin
2013-11-11 7:53 ` Ming Lei
2013-11-11 8:37 ` Axel Lin
2013-11-11 9:57 ` Ming Lei
2013-11-11 10:41 ` Ming Lei
2013-11-11 17:15 ` Jonathan Austin
2013-11-11 19:32 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2013-11-12 3:22 ` Ming Lei
2013-11-12 17:36 ` Jonathan Austin
2013-11-13 4:41 ` Ming Lei
2013-11-13 9:58 ` Axel Lin
2013-11-13 11:30 ` Ming Lei
2013-12-02 1:57 ` Axel Lin
2013-12-02 2:08 ` Ming Lei
2013-12-10 6:17 ` Rusty Russell
2013-11-11 8:01 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2013-11-08 3:56 ` Axel Lin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131111193236.GB16735@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=axel.lin@ingics.com \
--cc=jonathan.austin@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mmarek@suse.cz \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=tom.leiming@gmail.com \
--cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®