* [PATCH] PNPBIOS: check return value of pnp_add_device()
@ 2013-12-15 12:11 Dmitry Torokhov
2014-01-06 22:35 ` Dmitry Torokhov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Dmitry Torokhov @ 2013-12-15 12:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki; +Cc: Bjorn Helgaas, linux-kernel
pnp_add_device() may fail so we need to handle errors and avoid leaking
memory.
Also, when pnp_alloc_dev fails, return -ENOMEM rather than -1.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
---
drivers/pnp/pnpbios/core.c | 12 +++++++++---
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pnp/pnpbios/core.c b/drivers/pnp/pnpbios/core.c
index 9b86a01..074569e 100644
--- a/drivers/pnp/pnpbios/core.c
+++ b/drivers/pnp/pnpbios/core.c
@@ -312,18 +312,19 @@ static int __init insert_device(struct pnp_bios_node *node)
struct list_head *pos;
struct pnp_dev *dev;
char id[8];
+ int error;
/* check if the device is already added */
list_for_each(pos, &pnpbios_protocol.devices) {
dev = list_entry(pos, struct pnp_dev, protocol_list);
if (dev->number == node->handle)
- return -1;
+ return -EEXIST;
}
pnp_eisa_id_to_string(node->eisa_id & PNP_EISA_ID_MASK, id);
dev = pnp_alloc_dev(&pnpbios_protocol, node->handle, id);
if (!dev)
- return -1;
+ return -ENOMEM;
pnpbios_parse_data_stream(dev, node);
dev->active = pnp_is_active(dev);
@@ -342,7 +343,12 @@ static int __init insert_device(struct pnp_bios_node *node)
if (!dev->active)
pnp_init_resources(dev);
- pnp_add_device(dev);
+ error = pnp_add_device(dev);
+ if (error) {
+ put_device(&dev->dev);
+ return error;
+ }
+
pnpbios_interface_attach_device(node);
return 0;
--
1.8.3.1
--
Dmitry
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] PNPBIOS: check return value of pnp_add_device()
2013-12-15 12:11 [PATCH] PNPBIOS: check return value of pnp_add_device() Dmitry Torokhov
@ 2014-01-06 22:35 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2014-01-06 23:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Dmitry Torokhov @ 2014-01-06 22:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki; +Cc: Bjorn Helgaas, linux-kernel
Hi Rafael,
On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 04:11:05AM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> pnp_add_device() may fail so we need to handle errors and avoid leaking
> memory.
>
> Also, when pnp_alloc_dev fails, return -ENOMEM rather than -1.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Any issues with this patch and a similar one to PNPACPI?
Thanks!
> ---
> drivers/pnp/pnpbios/core.c | 12 +++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pnp/pnpbios/core.c b/drivers/pnp/pnpbios/core.c
> index 9b86a01..074569e 100644
> --- a/drivers/pnp/pnpbios/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/pnp/pnpbios/core.c
> @@ -312,18 +312,19 @@ static int __init insert_device(struct pnp_bios_node *node)
> struct list_head *pos;
> struct pnp_dev *dev;
> char id[8];
> + int error;
>
> /* check if the device is already added */
> list_for_each(pos, &pnpbios_protocol.devices) {
> dev = list_entry(pos, struct pnp_dev, protocol_list);
> if (dev->number == node->handle)
> - return -1;
> + return -EEXIST;
> }
>
> pnp_eisa_id_to_string(node->eisa_id & PNP_EISA_ID_MASK, id);
> dev = pnp_alloc_dev(&pnpbios_protocol, node->handle, id);
> if (!dev)
> - return -1;
> + return -ENOMEM;
>
> pnpbios_parse_data_stream(dev, node);
> dev->active = pnp_is_active(dev);
> @@ -342,7 +343,12 @@ static int __init insert_device(struct pnp_bios_node *node)
> if (!dev->active)
> pnp_init_resources(dev);
>
> - pnp_add_device(dev);
> + error = pnp_add_device(dev);
> + if (error) {
> + put_device(&dev->dev);
> + return error;
> + }
> +
> pnpbios_interface_attach_device(node);
>
> return 0;
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
>
> --
> Dmitry
--
Dmitry
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] PNPBIOS: check return value of pnp_add_device()
2014-01-06 23:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2014-01-06 23:22 ` Dmitry Torokhov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Dmitry Torokhov @ 2014-01-06 23:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki; +Cc: Bjorn Helgaas, linux-kernel
On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 12:32:30AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> I've just queued up your patch for 3.14 (the other one has already been in
> my tree for a while).
Cool, thanks!
--
Dmitry
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] PNPBIOS: check return value of pnp_add_device()
2014-01-06 22:35 ` Dmitry Torokhov
@ 2014-01-06 23:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-01-06 23:22 ` Dmitry Torokhov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2014-01-06 23:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dmitry Torokhov; +Cc: Bjorn Helgaas, linux-kernel
Hi Dmitry,
I've just queued up your patch for 3.14 (the other one has already been in
my tree for a while).
Thanks,
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-01-06 23:23 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-12-15 12:11 [PATCH] PNPBIOS: check return value of pnp_add_device() Dmitry Torokhov
2014-01-06 22:35 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2014-01-06 23:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-01-06 23:22 ` Dmitry Torokhov
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®