From: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
To: Zoltan Kiss <zoltan.kiss@citrix.com>
Cc: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>, <ian.campbell@citrix.com>,
<xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <jonathan.davies@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/9] xen-netback: Change TX path from grant copy to mapping
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 19:06:54 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131216190654.GF25969@zion.uk.xensource.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52AF4D28.8070001@citrix.com>
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 06:57:44PM +0000, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
> On 16/12/13 18:21, Wei Liu wrote:
> >On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 03:38:05PM +0000, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
> >[...]
> >>>>+ for (i = 0; i < MAX_PENDING_REQS; ++i) {
> >>>>+ if (vif->grant_tx_handle[i] != NETBACK_INVALID_HANDLE) {
> >>>>+ i = 0;
> >>>>+ unmap_timeout++;
> >>>>+ msleep(1000);
> >>>>+ if (unmap_timeout > 9 &&
> >>>>+ net_ratelimit())
> >>>>+ netdev_err(vif->dev,
> >>>>+ "Page still granted! Index: %x\n", i);
> >>>>+ }
> >>>>+ }
> >>>>+
> >>>>+ free_xenballooned_pages(MAX_PENDING_REQS, vif->mmap_pages);
> >>>>+
> >>>
> >>>If some pages are stuck and you just free them will it cause Dom0 to
> >>>crash? I mean, if those pages are recycled by other balloon page users.
> >>>
> >>>Even if it will not cause Dom0 to crash, will it leak any resource in
> >>>Dom0? At plain sight it looks like at least grant table entry is leaked,
> >>>isn't it? We need to be careful about this because a malicious might be
> >>>able to DoS Dom0 with resource leakage.
> >>Yes, if we call free_xenballooned_pages while something is still
> >>mapped, Xen kills Dom0 because balloon driver tries to touch the PTE
> >>of a grant mapped page. That's why we make sure before that
> >>everything is unmapped, and repeat an error message if it's not. I'm
>
> There is an "i = 0" if we find a valid handle. So we start again
Oops, missed that.
> checking the whole array from the second element (incorrectly, it
> should be "i = -1"!), and we print an incorrect error message, but
> essentially we are not leaving the loop, unless the first element
> was the problematic. We can modify that to "i--" or "i = -1" if we
> want to recheck the whole array. It shouldn't happen at this point
> that we transmit new packets, starting from the beginning is just an
> extra safety check.
> Also, we should modify i after the printing of the error message.
>
So I did help find a bug though. :-)
Wei.
> Zoli
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-16 19:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-12 23:48 [PATCH net-next v2 0/9] xen-netback: TX grant mapping with SKBTX_DEV_ZEROCOPY instead of copy Zoltan Kiss
2013-12-12 23:48 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/9] xen-netback: Introduce TX grant map definitions Zoltan Kiss
2013-12-13 15:31 ` Wei Liu
2013-12-13 18:22 ` Zoltan Kiss
2013-12-13 19:14 ` Wei Liu
2013-12-16 15:21 ` Zoltan Kiss
2013-12-16 17:50 ` Wei Liu
2014-01-07 14:50 ` Zoltan Kiss
2013-12-12 23:48 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/9] xen-netback: Change TX path from grant copy to mapping Zoltan Kiss
2013-12-13 15:36 ` Wei Liu
2013-12-16 15:38 ` Zoltan Kiss
2013-12-16 18:21 ` Wei Liu
2013-12-16 18:57 ` Zoltan Kiss
2013-12-16 19:06 ` Wei Liu [this message]
2013-12-17 21:49 ` [Xen-devel] " Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-12-30 17:58 ` Zoltan Kiss
2013-12-12 23:48 ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/9] xen-netback: Remove old TX grant copy definitons and fix indentations Zoltan Kiss
2013-12-12 23:48 ` [PATCH net-next v2 4/9] xen-netback: Change RX path for mapped SKB fragments Zoltan Kiss
2013-12-12 23:48 ` [PATCH net-next v2 5/9] xen-netback: Add stat counters for zerocopy Zoltan Kiss
2013-12-12 23:48 ` [PATCH net-next v2 6/9] xen-netback: Handle guests with too many frags Zoltan Kiss
2013-12-13 15:43 ` Wei Liu
2013-12-16 16:10 ` Zoltan Kiss
2013-12-16 18:09 ` Wei Liu
2014-01-07 15:23 ` Zoltan Kiss
2013-12-12 23:48 ` [PATCH net-next v2 7/9] xen-netback: Add stat counters for frag_list skbs Zoltan Kiss
2013-12-12 23:48 ` [PATCH net-next v2 8/9] xen-netback: Timeout packets in RX path Zoltan Kiss
2013-12-13 15:44 ` Wei Liu
2013-12-16 17:16 ` Zoltan Kiss
2013-12-16 19:03 ` Wei Liu
2013-12-12 23:48 ` [PATCH net-next v2 9/9] xen-netback: Aggregate TX unmap operations Zoltan Kiss
2013-12-13 15:44 ` Wei Liu
2013-12-16 16:30 ` Zoltan Kiss
2013-12-16 6:32 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH net-next v2 0/9] xen-netback: TX grant mapping with SKBTX_DEV_ZEROCOPY instead of copy annie li
2013-12-16 16:13 ` Zoltan Kiss
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131216190654.GF25969@zion.uk.xensource.com \
--to=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=jonathan.davies@citrix.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
--cc=zoltan.kiss@citrix.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®