mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>,
	Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] rcu_dereference_check_fdtable fix/cleanups
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2014 16:19:18 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140108151918.GA5156@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140108132852.GF10038@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On 01/08, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> I am not all that excited about invoking rcu_lock_acquire() outside
> of RCU...

Yes, me too. That is why I thought about the helper with a good name,
see below.

> Another approach would be to add an argument to files_fdtable()
> that is zero normally and one for "we know we don't need RCU
> protection."  Then rcu_dereference_check() could be something
> like the following:
>
> #define files_fdtable(files, c) \
> 		(rcu_dereference_check_fdtable((files), (files)->fdt) || c)
>
> Would that work?

Yes, I considered this optiion, but this needs much more uglifications^W
changes.

Either we need to change all users of files_fdtable(), or we need something
like

	#define __rcu_dereference_check_fdtable(files, unshared, fdtfd) \
		rcu_dereference_check((fdtfd), unshared || lockdep_is_held(&(files)->file_lock))

	#define rcu_dereference_check_fdtable(files, fdtfd)
		__rcu_dereference_check_fdtable(files, false, fdtfd)

	#define __files_fdtable(files)
		__rcu_dereference_check_fdtable((files), true, (files)->fdt)

	#define files_fdtable(files)
		__rcu_dereference_check_fdtable((files), false, (files)->fdt)

Plus we need

	static inline struct file *__fcheck_files(struct files_struct *files,
						bool unshared, unsigned int fd)
	{
		struct file *file = NULL;
		struct fdtable *fdt = __rcu_dereference_check_fdtable(files, unshared, files->fdt);

		if (fd < fdt->max_fds)
			file = __rcu_dereference_check_fdtable(files, unshared, fdt->fd[fd]);
		return file;
	}

doesn't look very nice...

As for 2/2, probably close_files() can simply do

	/*
	 * It is safe to dereference the fd table without RCU or
	 * ->file_lock because this is the last reference to the
	 * files structure.
	 */
	fdt = rcu_dereference_raw(files->fdt);

Or we can add

	#define __files_fdtable(files)	\
		 rcu_dereference_raw((files)->fdt)

but it is not clear to me what 1/1 should do. Perhaps

	static inline struct file *__fcheck_files(struct files_struct *files, unsigned int fd)
	{
		struct fdtable *fdt = rcu_dereference_raw(files->fdt);
		struct file *file = NULL;

		if (fd < fdt->max_fds)
			file = rcu_dereference_raw(fdt->fd[fd]);

		return file;
	}

	static inline struct file *fcheck_files(struct files_struct *files, unsigned int fd)
	{
		rcu_lockdep_assert(rcu_read_lock_held() ||
				   lockdep_is_held(files->file_lock),
				   "message");
		return __fcheck_files(files, fd);
	}

?

Oleg.


  reply	other threads:[~2014-01-08 15:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-01-07 18:12 Oleg Nesterov
2014-01-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 1/2] introduce __fcheck_files() to fix rcu_dereference_check_fdtable(), kill rcu_my_thread_group_empty() Oleg Nesterov
2014-01-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 2/2] change close_files() to use rcu_lock_acquire() to shut up RCU-lockdep Oleg Nesterov
2014-01-08 13:28 ` [PATCH 0/2] rcu_dereference_check_fdtable fix/cleanups Paul E. McKenney
2014-01-08 15:19   ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2014-01-09  1:16     ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-01-10 15:34       ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-01-11  6:34         ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-01-11 18:19           ` [PATCH v2 " Oleg Nesterov
2014-01-11 18:19             ` [PATCH v2 1/2] introduce __fcheck_files() to fix rcu_dereference_check_fdtable(), kill rcu_my_thread_group_empty() Oleg Nesterov
2014-01-11 18:19             ` [PATCH v2 2/2] change close_files() to use rcu_dereference_raw(files->fdt) Oleg Nesterov
2014-01-11 22:27             ` [PATCH v2 0/2] rcu_dereference_check_fdtable fix/cleanups Paul E. McKenney
2014-01-13 15:47               ` [PATCH 0/3] fget*() cleanups Oleg Nesterov
2014-01-13 15:48                 ` [PATCH 1/3] fs: factor out common code in fget() and fget_raw() Oleg Nesterov
2014-01-13 23:29                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-01-13 15:48                 ` [PATCH 2/3] fs: factor out common code in fget_light() and fget_raw_light() Oleg Nesterov
2014-01-13 23:32                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-01-13 15:49                 ` [PATCH 3/3] fs: __fget_light() can use __fget() in slow path Oleg Nesterov
2014-01-13 23:37                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-01-13 23:45                 ` [PATCH 0/3] fget*() cleanups Al Viro

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140108151918.GA5156@redhat.com \
    --to=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome