From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>,
Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] rcu_dereference_check_fdtable fix/cleanups
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2014 17:16:50 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140109011650.GI10038@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140108151918.GA5156@redhat.com>
On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 04:19:18PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 01/08, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >
> > I am not all that excited about invoking rcu_lock_acquire() outside
> > of RCU...
>
> Yes, me too. That is why I thought about the helper with a good name,
> see below.
>
> > Another approach would be to add an argument to files_fdtable()
> > that is zero normally and one for "we know we don't need RCU
> > protection." Then rcu_dereference_check() could be something
> > like the following:
> >
> > #define files_fdtable(files, c) \
> > (rcu_dereference_check_fdtable((files), (files)->fdt) || c)
> >
> > Would that work?
>
> Yes, I considered this optiion, but this needs much more uglifications^W
> changes.
>
> Either we need to change all users of files_fdtable(), or we need something
> like
There are only about 20 uses of files_fdtable() in 3.12, with almost all
of them in fs/file.c. So is changing all the users really all that
problematic?
Thanx, Paul
> #define __rcu_dereference_check_fdtable(files, unshared, fdtfd) \
> rcu_dereference_check((fdtfd), unshared || lockdep_is_held(&(files)->file_lock))
>
> #define rcu_dereference_check_fdtable(files, fdtfd)
> __rcu_dereference_check_fdtable(files, false, fdtfd)
>
> #define __files_fdtable(files)
> __rcu_dereference_check_fdtable((files), true, (files)->fdt)
>
> #define files_fdtable(files)
> __rcu_dereference_check_fdtable((files), false, (files)->fdt)
>
> Plus we need
>
> static inline struct file *__fcheck_files(struct files_struct *files,
> bool unshared, unsigned int fd)
> {
> struct file *file = NULL;
> struct fdtable *fdt = __rcu_dereference_check_fdtable(files, unshared, files->fdt);
>
> if (fd < fdt->max_fds)
> file = __rcu_dereference_check_fdtable(files, unshared, fdt->fd[fd]);
> return file;
> }
>
> doesn't look very nice...
>
> As for 2/2, probably close_files() can simply do
>
> /*
> * It is safe to dereference the fd table without RCU or
> * ->file_lock because this is the last reference to the
> * files structure.
> */
> fdt = rcu_dereference_raw(files->fdt);
>
> Or we can add
>
> #define __files_fdtable(files) \
> rcu_dereference_raw((files)->fdt)
>
> but it is not clear to me what 1/1 should do. Perhaps
>
> static inline struct file *__fcheck_files(struct files_struct *files, unsigned int fd)
> {
> struct fdtable *fdt = rcu_dereference_raw(files->fdt);
> struct file *file = NULL;
>
> if (fd < fdt->max_fds)
> file = rcu_dereference_raw(fdt->fd[fd]);
>
> return file;
> }
>
> static inline struct file *fcheck_files(struct files_struct *files, unsigned int fd)
> {
> rcu_lockdep_assert(rcu_read_lock_held() ||
> lockdep_is_held(files->file_lock),
> "message");
> return __fcheck_files(files, fd);
> }
>
> ?
>
> Oleg.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-09 22:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-07 18:12 Oleg Nesterov
2014-01-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 1/2] introduce __fcheck_files() to fix rcu_dereference_check_fdtable(), kill rcu_my_thread_group_empty() Oleg Nesterov
2014-01-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 2/2] change close_files() to use rcu_lock_acquire() to shut up RCU-lockdep Oleg Nesterov
2014-01-08 13:28 ` [PATCH 0/2] rcu_dereference_check_fdtable fix/cleanups Paul E. McKenney
2014-01-08 15:19 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-01-09 1:16 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2014-01-10 15:34 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-01-11 6:34 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-01-11 18:19 ` [PATCH v2 " Oleg Nesterov
2014-01-11 18:19 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] introduce __fcheck_files() to fix rcu_dereference_check_fdtable(), kill rcu_my_thread_group_empty() Oleg Nesterov
2014-01-11 18:19 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] change close_files() to use rcu_dereference_raw(files->fdt) Oleg Nesterov
2014-01-11 22:27 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] rcu_dereference_check_fdtable fix/cleanups Paul E. McKenney
2014-01-13 15:47 ` [PATCH 0/3] fget*() cleanups Oleg Nesterov
2014-01-13 15:48 ` [PATCH 1/3] fs: factor out common code in fget() and fget_raw() Oleg Nesterov
2014-01-13 23:29 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-01-13 15:48 ` [PATCH 2/3] fs: factor out common code in fget_light() and fget_raw_light() Oleg Nesterov
2014-01-13 23:32 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-01-13 15:49 ` [PATCH 3/3] fs: __fget_light() can use __fget() in slow path Oleg Nesterov
2014-01-13 23:37 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-01-13 23:45 ` [PATCH 0/3] fget*() cleanups Al Viro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140109011650.GI10038@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome