Re: Regression on next-20140116 [Was: [PATCH 3/3 v4] usb: chipidea: hw_phymode_configure moved before ci_usb_phy_init]

[Peter Chen <peter.chen@freescale.com>]

On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 10:41:33PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 10:49:51AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 04:01:50PM +0800, Chris Ruehl wrote:
> > > usb: chipidea: hw_phymode_configure moved before ci_usb_phy_init
> > > hw_phymode_configure configures the PORTSC registers and allow the
> > > following phy_inits to operate on the right parameters. This fix a problem
> > > where the UPLI (ISP1504) could not detected, because the Viewport was not
> > > available and read the viewport return 0's only.
> > This patch (or a later revision of it to be more exact) made it into
> > mainline as cd0b42c2a6d2.
> > 
> > On an i.MX27 based machine I'm hitting an oops (see below) on
> > next-20140116 + a few patches. (I didn't switch to 3.13+ yet, as I think
> > not everything I need has landed there.) The oops goes away (and still
> > better, lsusb reports my connected devices instead of "unable to
> > initialize libusb: -99") when I do at least one of the following:
> > 
> >  - set CONFIG_USB_CHIPIDEA=y instead of =m
> >  - revert commit
> >       cd0b42c2a6d2 (usb: chipidea: put hw_phymode_configure before ci_usb_phy_init)
> I debugged that a bit further and the problem is that
> hw_phymode_configure depends on the phy's clk being enabled (i.e.
> usb_ipg_gate) and this is only enforced in ci_usb_phy_init (via
> usb_phy_init -> usb_gen_phy_init). When CONFIG_USB_CHIPIDEA=y the init
> call to disable all unused clocks wasn't run yet and so the clock is
> still on as this is the boot default.

Hi Uwe,
I am a little puzzled at your platform

- Which phy you have used? ulpi phy ,internal phy or other external phy?
- If you use ulpi phy, why you still need to use nop phy driver?
 Besides, according to chris patch, the ulpi can only be visited after
hw_phymode_configure?
- Do you have some hardware related operation at phy's probe? If it exists,
why not move it to phy->init?

Peter

> 
> Considering that it's already late today and that I don't know the
> chipidea driver I'm sure there are people who can come up with a better
> patch with less effort than me. Any volunteers?
> 
> Best regards
> Uwe
> 
> -- 
> Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
> Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
> 
> 

-- 

Best Regards,
Peter Chen