From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: linux-edac@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>,
Doug Thompson <dougthompson@xmission.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] EDAC: Correct workqueue setup path
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 18:22:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140212172254.GI5121@pd.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140212163644.GG5121@pd.tnic>
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
We're using edac_mc_workq_setup() both on the init path, when
we load an edac driver and when we change the polling period
(edac_mc_reset_delay_period) through /sys/.../edac_mc_poll_msec.
On that second path we don't need to init the workqueue which has been
initialized already.
Thanks to Tejun for workqueue insights.
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
---
drivers/edac/edac_mc.c | 11 +++++++----
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/edac/edac_mc.c b/drivers/edac/edac_mc.c
index aef5ec24908e..33edd6766344 100644
--- a/drivers/edac/edac_mc.c
+++ b/drivers/edac/edac_mc.c
@@ -559,7 +559,8 @@ static void edac_mc_workq_function(struct work_struct *work_req)
*
* called with the mem_ctls_mutex held
*/
-static void edac_mc_workq_setup(struct mem_ctl_info *mci, unsigned msec)
+static void edac_mc_workq_setup(struct mem_ctl_info *mci, unsigned msec,
+ bool init)
{
edac_dbg(0, "\n");
@@ -567,7 +568,9 @@ static void edac_mc_workq_setup(struct mem_ctl_info *mci, unsigned msec)
if (mci->op_state != OP_RUNNING_POLL)
return;
- INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&mci->work, edac_mc_workq_function);
+ if (init)
+ INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&mci->work, edac_mc_workq_function);
+
mod_delayed_work(edac_workqueue, &mci->work, msecs_to_jiffies(msec));
}
@@ -611,7 +614,7 @@ void edac_mc_reset_delay_period(unsigned long value)
list_for_each(item, &mc_devices) {
mci = list_entry(item, struct mem_ctl_info, link);
- edac_mc_workq_setup(mci, value);
+ edac_mc_workq_setup(mci, value, false);
}
mutex_unlock(&mem_ctls_mutex);
@@ -782,7 +785,7 @@ int edac_mc_add_mc(struct mem_ctl_info *mci)
/* This instance is NOW RUNNING */
mci->op_state = OP_RUNNING_POLL;
- edac_mc_workq_setup(mci, edac_mc_get_poll_msec());
+ edac_mc_workq_setup(mci, edac_mc_get_poll_msec(), true);
} else {
mci->op_state = OP_RUNNING_INTERRUPT;
}
--
1.8.5.2.192.g7794a68
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-12 17:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-03 20:05 [PATCH] edac, poll timeout cannot be zero Prarit Bhargava
2014-02-12 15:07 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-02-12 15:16 ` Tejun Heo
2014-02-12 15:57 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-02-12 16:23 ` Tejun Heo
2014-02-12 16:36 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-02-12 17:22 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140212172254.GI5121@pd.tnic \
--to=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dougthompson@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=prarit@redhat.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome