From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@canonical.com>
Cc: "Toralf Förster" <toralf.foerster@gmx.de>,
"Michele Ballabio" <barra_cuda@katamail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, fweisbec@gmail.com,
mingo@kernel.org, "Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
"David Cohen" <david.a.cohen@linux.intel.com>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Borislav Petkov" <bp@alien8.de>,
"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
"Greg KH" <greg@kroah.com>
Subject: [PATCH -stable] x86,preempt: Fix preemption for i386
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 16:24:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140409142447.GD13658@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140409094515.GR11096@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Greg, Linus,
I'm not entirely clear on how acceptable it is to propose a different
patch for -stable than what we have upstream.
The below Changelog explain, but in short, we should either backport 4
rather invasive patches to .13-stable and .14-stable or do the small
patch provided.
The 4 patches by Steven are the right thing to do, but I feel they might
be too invasive to propose for -stable, therefore the alternative
approach.
---
Subject: x86,preempt: Fix preemption for i386
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 14:21:28 +0200
Many people reported preemption/reschedule problems with i386 kernels
for .13 and .14. After Michele bisected this to a combination of
3e8e42c69bb ("sched: Revert need_resched() to look at TIF_NEED_RESCHED")
ded79754754 ("irq: Force hardirq exit's softirq processing on its own stack")
it finally dawned on me that i386's current_thread_info() was to
blame.
When we are on interrupt/exception stacks, we fail to observe the
right TIF_NEED_RESCHED bit and therefore the PREEMPT_NEED_RESCHED
folding malfunctions.
Current upstream fixes this by making i386 behave the same as x86_64
already did:
2432e1364bbe ("x86: Nuke the supervisor_stack field in i386 thread_info")
b807902a88c4 ("x86: Nuke GET_THREAD_INFO_WITH_ESP() macro for i386")
0788aa6a23cb ("x86: Prepare removal of previous_esp from i386 thread_info structure")
198d208df437 ("x86: Keep thread_info on thread stack in x86_32")
However, that is far too much to stuff into -stable. Therefore I
propose we merge the below patch which uses task_thread_info(current)
for tif_need_resched() instead of the ESP based current_thread_info().
This makes sure we always observe the one true TIF_NEED_RESCHED bit
and things will work as expected again.
Cc: fweisbec@gmail.com
Cc: mingo@kernel.org
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: David Cohen <david.a.cohen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Tested-by: Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@canonical.com>
Tested-by: Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster@gmx.de>
Tested-by: Michele Ballabio <barra_cuda@katamail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h | 11 +++++++++++
include/linux/preempt.h | 4 ++++
include/linux/thread_info.h | 2 --
3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h
@@ -5,6 +5,17 @@
#include <asm/percpu.h>
#include <linux/thread_info.h>
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
+/*
+ * i386's current_thread_info() depends on ESP and for interrupt/exception
+ * stacks this doesn't yield the actual task thread_info.
+ *
+ * We hard rely on the fact that all the TIF_NEED_RESCHED bits are
+ * the same, therefore use the slightly more expensive version below.
+ */
+#define tif_need_resched() test_tsk_thread_flag(current, TIF_NEED_RESCHED)
+#endif
+
DECLARE_PER_CPU(int, __preempt_count);
/*
--- a/include/linux/preempt.h
+++ b/include/linux/preempt.h
@@ -17,6 +17,10 @@
#include <asm/preempt.h>
+#ifndef tif_need_resched
+#define tif_need_resched() test_thread_flag(TIF_NEED_RESCHED)
+#endif
+
#if defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT) || defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT_TRACER)
extern void preempt_count_add(int val);
extern void preempt_count_sub(int val);
--- a/include/linux/thread_info.h
+++ b/include/linux/thread_info.h
@@ -118,8 +118,6 @@ static inline __deprecated void set_need
*/
}
-#define tif_need_resched() test_thread_flag(TIF_NEED_RESCHED)
-
#if defined TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK && !defined HAVE_SET_RESTORE_SIGMASK
/*
* An arch can define its own version of set_restore_sigmask() to get the
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-09 14:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-06 15:19 Bisected KVM hang on x86-32 between v3.12 and v3.13 Michele Ballabio
2014-04-06 15:52 ` Toralf Förster
2014-04-06 17:40 ` Michele Ballabio
2014-04-07 15:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-07 15:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-07 18:16 ` Toralf Förster
2014-04-07 18:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-08 12:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-08 19:14 ` Michele Ballabio
2014-04-08 19:51 ` Michele Ballabio
2014-04-08 20:28 ` Toralf Förster
2014-04-09 9:14 ` Stefan Bader
2014-04-09 9:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-09 14:24 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2014-04-09 14:36 ` [PATCH -stable] x86,preempt: Fix preemption for i386 Linus Torvalds
2014-04-09 19:19 ` Greg KH
2014-04-09 19:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-09 19:57 ` Greg KH
2014-05-13 23:56 ` Greg KH
2014-04-07 18:59 ` Bisected KVM hang on x86-32 between v3.12 and v3.13 Frederic Weisbecker
2014-04-07 19:57 ` Toralf Förster
2014-04-07 22:43 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-04-07 19:49 ` Michele Ballabio
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140409142447.GD13658@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=barra_cuda@katamail.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=david.a.cohen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=stefan.bader@canonical.com \
--cc=toralf.foerster@gmx.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome