From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: "Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
"Stefan Bader" <stefan.bader@canonical.com>,
"Toralf Förster" <toralf.foerster@gmx.de>,
"Michele Ballabio" <barra_cuda@katamail.com>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Frédéric Weisbecker" <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@kernel.org>,
"Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
"David Cohen" <david.a.cohen@linux.intel.com>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Borislav Petkov" <bp@alien8.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -stable] x86,preempt: Fix preemption for i386
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 12:19:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140409191931.GB10748@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFzBw0i2nmOGOKzjS_b_7M1Gha2OFEe9rXOO4c+s-2HTkg@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 07:36:23AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 7:24 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> >
> > I'm not entirely clear on how acceptable it is to propose a different
> > patch for -stable than what we have upstream.
>
> It's not all that common, but it certainly happens.
>
> It's fine, as long as it mentions the commits that fix it upstream.
> And as long as it's well tested, of course.
I agree, I can take this as long as you say it's correct and tested...
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-09 19:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-06 15:19 Bisected KVM hang on x86-32 between v3.12 and v3.13 Michele Ballabio
2014-04-06 15:52 ` Toralf Förster
2014-04-06 17:40 ` Michele Ballabio
2014-04-07 15:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-07 15:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-07 18:16 ` Toralf Förster
2014-04-07 18:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-08 12:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-08 19:14 ` Michele Ballabio
2014-04-08 19:51 ` Michele Ballabio
2014-04-08 20:28 ` Toralf Förster
2014-04-09 9:14 ` Stefan Bader
2014-04-09 9:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-09 14:24 ` [PATCH -stable] x86,preempt: Fix preemption for i386 Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-09 14:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-04-09 19:19 ` Greg KH [this message]
2014-04-09 19:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-09 19:57 ` Greg KH
2014-05-13 23:56 ` Greg KH
2014-04-07 18:59 ` Bisected KVM hang on x86-32 between v3.12 and v3.13 Frederic Weisbecker
2014-04-07 19:57 ` Toralf Förster
2014-04-07 22:43 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-04-07 19:49 ` Michele Ballabio
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140409191931.GB10748@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=barra_cuda@katamail.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=david.a.cohen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=stefan.bader@canonical.com \
--cc=toralf.foerster@gmx.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®