From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: mingo@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, luto@amacapital.net,
nicolas.pitre@linaro.org, daniel.lezcano@linaro.org,
peterz@infradead.org, umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 6/8] sched,idle: Avoid spurious wakeup IPIs
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 15:42:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140411135218.478299389@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140411134243.160989490@infradead.org>
[-- Attachment #1: peterz-sched-resched_cpu.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 2698 bytes --]
Because mwait_idle_with_hints() gets called from !idle context it must
call current_clr_polling(). This however means that resched_task() is
very likely to send an IPI even when we were polling:
CPU0 CPU1
if (current_set_polling_and_test())
goto out;
__monitor(&ti->flags);
if (!need_resched())
__mwait(eax, ecx);
set_tsk_need_resched(p);
smp_mb();
out:
current_clr_polling();
if (!tsk_is_polling(p))
smp_send_reschedule(cpu);
So while it is correct (extra IPIs aren't a problem, whereas a missed
IPI would be) it is a performance problem (for some).
Avoid this issue by using fetch_or() to atomically set NEED_RESCHED
and test if POLLING_NRFLAG is set.
Since a CPU stuck in mwait is unlikely to modify the flags word,
contention on the cmpxchg is unlikely and thus we should mostly
succeed in a single go.
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -505,6 +505,39 @@ static inline void init_hrtick(void)
#endif /* CONFIG_SCHED_HRTICK */
/*
+ * cmpxchg based fetch_or, macro so it works for different integer types
+ */
+#define fetch_or(ptr, val) \
+({ typeof(*(ptr)) __old, __val = *(ptr); \
+ for (;;) { \
+ __old = cmpxchg((ptr), __val, __val | (val)); \
+ if (__old == __val) \
+ break; \
+ __val = __old; \
+ } \
+ __old; \
+})
+
+#ifdef TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG
+/*
+ * Atomically set TIF_NEED_RESCHED and test for TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG,
+ * this avoids any races wrt polling state changes and thereby avoids
+ * spurious IPIs.
+ */
+static bool set_nr_and_not_polling(struct task_struct *p)
+{
+ struct thread_info *ti = task_thread_info(p);
+ return !(fetch_or(&ti->flags, _TIF_NEED_RESCHED) & _TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG);
+}
+#else
+static bool set_nr_and_not_polling(struct task_struct *p)
+{
+ set_tsk_need_resched(p);
+ return true;
+}
+#endif
+
+/*
* resched_task - mark a task 'to be rescheduled now'.
*
* On UP this means the setting of the need_resched flag, on SMP it
@@ -520,17 +553,15 @@ void resched_task(struct task_struct *p)
if (test_tsk_need_resched(p))
return;
- set_tsk_need_resched(p);
-
cpu = task_cpu(p);
+
if (cpu == smp_processor_id()) {
+ set_tsk_need_resched(p);
set_preempt_need_resched();
return;
}
- /* NEED_RESCHED must be visible before we test polling */
- smp_mb();
- if (!tsk_is_polling(p))
+ if (set_nr_and_not_polling(p))
smp_send_reschedule(cpu);
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-11 13:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-11 13:42 [RFC][PATCH 0/8] sched,idle: need resched polling rework Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-11 13:42 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/8] sched,idle,alpha: Switch from TS_POLLING to TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-11 14:38 ` Richard Henderson
2014-04-11 13:42 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/8] sched,idle,tile: " Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-11 15:15 ` Chris Metcalf
2014-04-11 15:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-11 13:42 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/8] sched,idle,ia64: " Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-11 13:42 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/8] sched,idle,x86: " Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-11 13:42 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/8] sched,idle: Remove TS_POLLING support Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-11 13:42 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2014-04-13 21:41 ` [RFC][PATCH 6/8] sched,idle: Avoid spurious wakeup IPIs Nicolas Pitre
2014-05-09 13:37 ` James Hogan
2014-05-09 14:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-09 14:40 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-05-09 14:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-09 14:57 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-05-09 17:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-09 17:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-09 17:09 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-05-09 17:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-19 12:54 ` [tip:sched/arch] arm64: Remove TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-22 12:26 ` [tip:sched/core] " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-09 14:51 ` [RFC][PATCH 6/8] sched,idle: Avoid spurious wakeup IPIs James Hogan
2014-05-15 9:17 ` James Hogan
2014-05-19 12:54 ` [tip:sched/arch] metag: Remove TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG tip-bot for James Hogan
2014-05-22 12:26 ` [tip:sched/core] " tip-bot for James Hogan
2014-04-11 13:42 ` [RFC][PATCH 7/8] sched,idle: Delay clearing the polling bit Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-13 21:51 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-04-11 13:42 ` [RFC][PATCH 8/8] sched,idle: Reflow cpuidle_idle_call() Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-13 21:36 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-04-14 8:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-14 9:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-14 13:55 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-04-11 15:00 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/8] sched,idle: need resched polling rework Andy Lutomirski
2014-04-11 15:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-22 12:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-22 13:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-29 0:01 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-05-29 6:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-03 6:40 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-06-03 6:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-03 10:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-03 14:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-03 16:05 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-06-03 16:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-03 16:52 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-06-03 17:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-03 18:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-03 18:44 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-06-03 20:07 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-04-12 8:35 ` Mike Galbraith
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140411135218.478299389@infradead.org \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=nicolas.pitre@linaro.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome