mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Waiman Long <waiman.long@hp.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	Paolo Bonzini <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
	Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>, Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>,
	Scott J Norton <scott.norton@hp.com>,
	Chegu Vinod <chegu_vinod@hp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 06/19] qspinlock: prolong the stay in the pending bit path
Date: Sat, 10 May 2014 15:38:29 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140510133829.GD30445@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <536D79C7.2000701@hp.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1964 bytes --]

On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 08:58:47PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> On 05/08/2014 02:58 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 11:01:34AM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> >>@@ -221,11 +222,37 @@ static inline int trylock_pending(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 *pval)
> >>  	 */
> >>  	for (;;) {
> >>  		/*
> >>-		 * If we observe any contention; queue.
> >>+		 * If we observe that the queue is not empty,
> >>+		 * return and be queued.
> >>  		 */
> >>-		if (val&  ~_Q_LOCKED_MASK)
> >>+		if (val&  _Q_TAIL_MASK)
> >>  			return 0;
> >>
> >>+		if (val == (_Q_LOCKED_VAL|_Q_PENDING_VAL)) {
> >>+			/*
> >>+			 * If both the lock and pending bits are set, we wait
> >>+			 * a while to see if that either bit will be cleared.
> >>+			 * If that is no change, we return and be queued.
> >>+			 */
> >>+			if (!retry)
> >>+				return 0;
> >>+			retry--;
> >>+			cpu_relax();
> >>+			cpu_relax();
> >>+			*pval = val = atomic_read(&lock->val);
> >>+			continue;
> >>+		} else if (val == _Q_PENDING_VAL) {
> >>+			/*
> >>+			 * Pending bit is set, but not the lock bit.
> >>+			 * Assuming that the pending bit holder is going to
> >>+			 * set the lock bit and clear the pending bit soon,
> >>+			 * it is better to wait than to exit at this point.
> >>+			 */
> >>+			cpu_relax();
> >>+			*pval = val = atomic_read(&lock->val);
> >>+			continue;
> >>+		}
> >Didn't I give a much saner alternative to this mess last time?
> 
> I don't recall you have any suggestion last time. Anyway, if you think the
> code is too messy, I think I can give up the first if statement which is
> more an optimistic spinning kind of code for short critical section. The 2nd
> if statement is still need to improve chance of using this code path due to
> timing reason. I will rerun my performance test to make sure it won't have
> too much performance impact.

lkml.kernel.org/r/20140417163640.GT11096@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2014-05-10 13:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-05-07 15:01 [PATCH v10 00/19] qspinlock: a 4-byte queue spinlock with PV support Waiman Long
2014-05-07 15:01 ` [PATCH v10 01/19] qspinlock: A simple generic 4-byte queue spinlock Waiman Long
2014-05-07 15:01 ` [PATCH v10 02/19] qspinlock, x86: Enable x86-64 to use " Waiman Long
2014-05-07 15:01 ` [PATCH v10 03/19] qspinlock: Add pending bit Waiman Long
2014-05-08 18:57   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-10  0:49     ` Waiman Long
2014-05-12 15:22   ` Radim Krčmář
2014-05-12 17:29     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-13 19:47     ` Waiman Long
2014-05-14 16:51       ` Radim Krčmář
2014-05-14 17:00         ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-14 19:13           ` Radim Krčmář
2014-05-19 20:17             ` Waiman Long
     [not found]               ` <20140521164930.GA26199@potion.brq.redhat.com>
2014-05-21 17:02                 ` [RFC 08/07] qspinlock: integrate pending bit into queue Radim Krčmář
2014-05-07 15:01 ` [PATCH v10 04/19] qspinlock: Extract out the exchange of tail code word Waiman Long
2014-05-07 15:01 ` [PATCH v10 05/19] qspinlock: Optimize for smaller NR_CPUS Waiman Long
2014-05-07 15:01 ` [PATCH v10 06/19] qspinlock: prolong the stay in the pending bit path Waiman Long
2014-05-08 18:58   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-10  0:58     ` Waiman Long
2014-05-10 13:38       ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2014-05-07 15:01 ` [PATCH v10 07/19] qspinlock: Use a simple write to grab the lock, if applicable Waiman Long
2014-05-08 19:00   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-10  1:05     ` Waiman Long
2014-05-08 19:02   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-10  1:06     ` Waiman Long
2014-05-07 15:01 ` [PATCH v10 08/19] qspinlock: Make a new qnode structure to support virtualization Waiman Long
2014-05-08 19:04   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-10  1:08     ` Waiman Long
2014-05-10 14:14       ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-10 18:21         ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-07 15:01 ` [PATCH v10 09/19] qspinlock: Prepare for unfair lock support Waiman Long
2014-05-08 19:06   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-10  1:19     ` Waiman Long
2014-05-10 14:13       ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-07 15:01 ` [PATCH v10 10/19] qspinlock, x86: Allow unfair spinlock in a virtual guest Waiman Long
2014-05-08 19:12   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-19 20:30     ` Waiman Long
2014-05-12 18:57   ` Radim Krčmář
2014-05-07 15:01 ` [PATCH v10 11/19] qspinlock: Split the MCS queuing code into a separate slowerpath Waiman Long
2014-05-07 15:01 ` [PATCH v10 12/19] unfair qspinlock: Variable frequency lock stealing mechanism Waiman Long
2014-05-08 19:19   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-07 15:01 ` [PATCH v10 13/19] unfair qspinlock: Enable lock stealing in lock waiters Waiman Long
2014-05-07 15:01 ` [PATCH v10 14/19] pvqspinlock, x86: Rename paravirt_ticketlocks_enabled Waiman Long
2014-05-07 15:01 ` [PATCH v10 15/19] pvqspinlock, x86: Add PV data structure & methods Waiman Long
2014-05-07 15:01 ` [PATCH v10 16/19] pvqspinlock: Enable coexistence with the unfair lock Waiman Long
2014-05-07 15:01 ` [PATCH v10 17/19] pvqspinlock: Add qspinlock para-virtualization support Waiman Long
2014-05-07 15:01 ` [PATCH v10 18/19] pvqspinlock, x86: Enable PV qspinlock PV for KVM Waiman Long
2014-05-07 19:07   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-05-08 17:54     ` Waiman Long
2014-05-07 15:01 ` [PATCH v10 19/19] pvqspinlock, x86: Enable PV qspinlock for XEN Waiman Long
2014-05-07 19:07 ` [PATCH v10 00/19] qspinlock: a 4-byte queue spinlock with PV support Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-05-08 17:54   ` Waiman Long

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140510133829.GD30445@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=chegu_vinod@hp.com \
    --cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
    --cc=gleb@redhat.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=paolo.bonzini@gmail.com \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=scott.norton@hp.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=waiman.long@hp.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome