[PATCH] char: Introduce the use of the managed version of kzalloc

[PATCH] char: Introduce the use of the managed version of kzalloc

[Himangi Saraogi]

This patch moves data allocated using kzalloc to managed data allocated
using devm_kzalloc and cleans now unnecessary kfrees in probe and remove
functions. The NULL assignment to np->units is removed as there is no
interaction between this field and sun4v_hvapi_unregister. Also, the
labels out_free_units and out_free are removed as they are no longer
required.

The following Coccinelle semantic patch was used for making the change:

@platform@
identifier p, probefn, removefn;
@@
struct platform_driver p = {
  .probe = probefn,
  .remove = removefn,
};

@prb@
identifier platform.probefn, pdev;
expression e, e1, e2;
@@
probefn(struct platform_device *pdev, ...) {
  <+...
- e = kzalloc(e1, e2)
+ e = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, e1, e2)
  ...
?-kfree(e);
  ...+>
}

@rem depends on prb@
identifier platform.removefn;
expression e;
@@
removefn(...) {
  <...
- kfree(e);
  ...>
}

Signed-off-by: Himangi Saraogi <himangi774@gmail.com>
---
I would like to know if removing the NULL assignment is OK as it may be
used for security to prevent it from being read before reinitialization.

 drivers/char/hw_random/n2-drv.c | 24 +++++++-----------------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/char/hw_random/n2-drv.c b/drivers/char/hw_random/n2-drv.c
index 432232e..292a588 100644
--- a/drivers/char/hw_random/n2-drv.c
+++ b/drivers/char/hw_random/n2-drv.c
@@ -632,7 +632,7 @@ static int n2rng_probe(struct platform_device *op)
 	multi_capable = (match->data != NULL);
 
 	n2rng_driver_version();
-	np = kzalloc(sizeof(*np), GFP_KERNEL);
+	np = devm_kzalloc(&op->dev, sizeof(*np), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!np)
 		goto out;
 	np->op = op;
@@ -653,7 +653,7 @@ static int n2rng_probe(struct platform_device *op)
 					 &np->hvapi_minor)) {
 			dev_err(&op->dev, "Cannot register suitable "
 				"HVAPI version.\n");
-			goto out_free;
+			goto out;
 		}
 	}
 
@@ -676,15 +676,16 @@ static int n2rng_probe(struct platform_device *op)
 	dev_info(&op->dev, "Registered RNG HVAPI major %lu minor %lu\n",
 		 np->hvapi_major, np->hvapi_minor);
 
-	np->units = kzalloc(sizeof(struct n2rng_unit) * np->num_units,
-			    GFP_KERNEL);
+	np->units = devm_kzalloc(&op->dev,
+				 sizeof(struct n2rng_unit) * np->num_units,
+				 GFP_KERNEL);
 	err = -ENOMEM;
 	if (!np->units)
 		goto out_hvapi_unregister;
 
 	err = n2rng_init_control(np);
 	if (err)
-		goto out_free_units;
+		goto out_hvapi_unregister;
 
 	dev_info(&op->dev, "Found %s RNG, units: %d\n",
 		 ((np->flags & N2RNG_FLAG_MULTI) ?
@@ -697,7 +698,7 @@ static int n2rng_probe(struct platform_device *op)
 
 	err = hwrng_register(&np->hwrng);
 	if (err)
-		goto out_free_units;
+		goto out_hvapi_unregister;
 
 	platform_set_drvdata(op, np);
 
@@ -705,15 +706,9 @@ static int n2rng_probe(struct platform_device *op)
 
 	return 0;
 
-out_free_units:
-	kfree(np->units);
-	np->units = NULL;
-
 out_hvapi_unregister:
 	sun4v_hvapi_unregister(HV_GRP_RNG);
 
-out_free:
-	kfree(np);
 out:
 	return err;
 }
@@ -730,11 +725,6 @@ static int n2rng_remove(struct platform_device *op)
 
 	sun4v_hvapi_unregister(HV_GRP_RNG);
 
-	kfree(np->units);
-	np->units = NULL;
-
-	kfree(np);
-
 	return 0;
 }
 
-- 
1.9.1

Re: [PATCH] char: Introduce the use of the managed version of kzalloc

[Herbert Xu]

On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 12:19:00AM +0530, Himangi Saraogi wrote:
> This patch moves data allocated using kzalloc to managed data allocated
> using devm_kzalloc and cleans now unnecessary kfrees in probe and remove
> functions. The NULL assignment to np->units is removed as there is no
> interaction between this field and sun4v_hvapi_unregister. Also, the
> labels out_free_units and out_free are removed as they are no longer
> required.
> 
> The following Coccinelle semantic patch was used for making the change:
> 
> @platform@
> identifier p, probefn, removefn;
> @@
> struct platform_driver p = {
>   .probe = probefn,
>   .remove = removefn,
> };
> 
> @prb@
> identifier platform.probefn, pdev;
> expression e, e1, e2;
> @@
> probefn(struct platform_device *pdev, ...) {
>   <+...
> - e = kzalloc(e1, e2)
> + e = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, e1, e2)
>   ...
> ?-kfree(e);
>   ...+>
> }
> 
> @rem depends on prb@
> identifier platform.removefn;
> expression e;
> @@
> removefn(...) {
>   <...
> - kfree(e);
>   ...>
> }
> 
> Signed-off-by: Himangi Saraogi <himangi774@gmail.com>
> ---
> I would like to know if removing the NULL assignment is OK as it may be
> used for security to prevent it from being read before reinitialization.

Looks good to me.  Patch applied.  Thanks!
-- 
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt