From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: "xiaofeng.yan" <xiaofeng.yan@huawei.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
duzhiping.du@huawei.com, xiaofeng.yan2012@gmail.com,
juri.lelli@gmail.com, luca.abeni@unitn.it, raistlin@linux.it,
henrik@austad.us, tkhai@yandex.ru,
harald.gustafsson@ericsson.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFD] sched/deadline: EDF dynamic quota design
Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 14:55:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140514125515.GK13658@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140514113245.GZ11096@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3975 bytes --]
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 01:32:45PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 06:43:38PM +0800, xiaofeng.yan wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > We design dynamic quota function based on current EDF schedule .
> > Wehave realized this dynamic quota design and get good performance in the actual scene.
> > The impalement for this function is very strong connected with production line requirement.
> > In some implementations, the current design in product could be be accepted by community,
> > such as beyond the total bandwidth limitations.
> > So we design some parts again.
> > If you want to review our current implements in product, I will send our patches and test result.
> > We hope to push it to the main line. Could you give me suggestion whether it can be accepted or not?
> > We will be very grateful for your suggestion.
>
> At the very least you could've Cc'ed the people who actually wrote the
> EDF stuff :-/
Also, Cc lkml, left the rest of the msg intact as clearly people haven't
had a copy yet.
> > The design principle is as follows:
> >
> >
> > ------------------EDF Dynamic Quota Design------------------
> >
> > * Current EDF defect
> > EDF tasks' bandwidth is fixed currently. they could not adjust
> > their quota whenever they are busy or idle.
> >
> > * The scene for dynamic quota
> > Currently, we have the scenarios which need to adjust tasks'
> > quota dynamically. Such as, the network's workload fluctuates when
> > forwarding the packets, which results in imbalance. Busy task should
> > increase quota, and idle task should reduce quota.
> > It is beneficial to increase the processing ability of the business.
> >
> > * Dynamic quota idea
> > We add the dynamic quota function based on current EDF schedule.
> > The principle is as follows:
> > The total bandwidth of EDF tasks is fixed during running.
> > Idle tasks release left bandwidth to the global bandwidth pool, and
> > busy tasks get some quota from the global pool.
> >
> > * Example.
> > Three tasks: T1,T2,T3. Their initial status is as follows,
> > T1(200us,500us,500us)
> > T2(200us,500us,500us)
> > T3(200us,500us,500us)
> >
> > At time t1, the tasks' running status is as follows,
> > T1(200us,500us,500us)
> > T2(100us,500us,500us)
> > T3(200us,500us,500us)
> > Busy tasks: T1,T3
> > Idle task: T2
> > Bandwidth pool: 20%
> >
> > Now, there are 20% quota in the bandwidth pool, T1 or T3 get 5% quota
> > (adjustable) from the bandwidth pool when they enter run-queue.
> > Then, the status is as follows:
> > T1(225us,500us,500us)
> > T2(100us,500us,500us)
> > T3(225us,500us,500us)
> > Bandwidth pool: 10%
> >
> > Busy tasks could get the quota when the bandwidth pool is not empty.
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Yeah, not sure that's sound. But I'll leave that to others.
>
> So there have been papers on how if you transform the runtime into an
> avg the tardiness also turns into an avg and remains bounded.
>
> Now, you still have to guarantee your individual tasks respect the avg,
> otherwise the tardiness guarantees are out the window along with it.
>
> I've not thought through your proposal to see if it maintains this
> guarantee -- but seeing how you don't talk about guarantees at all I
> fear the worst.
>
> Another point is that 'avg' or 'dynamic' tasks should co-exist with the
> normal fixed runtime tasks (ideally) without affecting the performance
> of the normal tasks (too much).
>
> Your proposal also doesn't cover this.
>
> There have also been proposals to turn the CBS into a 'soft' CBS and
> instead of hard throttling allow the task to continue executing at a
> lower class (throttle in effect turns into a switch to SCHED_NORMAL, and
> unthrottle restores it to SCHED_DEADLINE).
>
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-14 12:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <537348DA.7080001@huawei.com>
[not found] ` <20140514113245.GZ11096@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
2014-05-14 12:55 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
[not found] ` <53736CD9.90805@unitn.it>
[not found] ` <5374A335.90705@huawei.com>
2014-05-15 12:31 ` Juri Lelli
2014-05-16 7:11 ` Henrik Austad
2014-05-21 12:45 ` Luca Abeni
2014-06-17 2:43 ` xiaofeng.yan
2014-06-17 8:01 ` Luca Abeni
2014-06-18 7:01 ` xiaofeng.yan
2014-06-19 9:13 ` Luca Abeni
2014-06-20 2:29 ` xiaofeng.yan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140514125515.GK13658@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=duzhiping.du@huawei.com \
--cc=harald.gustafsson@ericsson.com \
--cc=henrik@austad.us \
--cc=juri.lelli@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luca.abeni@unitn.it \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=raistlin@linux.it \
--cc=tkhai@yandex.ru \
--cc=xiaofeng.yan2012@gmail.com \
--cc=xiaofeng.yan@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome