From: "xiaofeng.yan" <xiaofeng.yan@huawei.com>
To: Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@unitn.it>
Cc: Henrik Austad <henrik@austad.us>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@gmail.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, <duzhiping.du@huawei.com>,
<xiaofeng.yan2012@gmail.com>, <raistlin@linux.it>,
<tkhai@yandex.ru>, <harald.gustafsson@ericsson.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFD] sched/deadline: EDF dynamic quota design
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 10:29:07 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53A39C73.2070004@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53A2A9BD.3070107@unitn.it>
On 2014/6/19 17:13, Luca Abeni wrote:
> On 06/18/2014 09:01 AM, xiaofeng.yan wrote:
> [...]
>>>>> I also had an implementation of the GRUB algorithm (based on a
>>>>> modification
>>>>> of my old CBS scheduler for Linux), but the computational
>>>>> complexity of the
>>>>> algorithm was too high. That's why I never proposed to merge it in
>>>>> SCHED_DEADLINE.
>>>>> But maybe there can be some trade-off between the "exact
>>>>> compliance with the
>>>>> GRUB algorithm" and implementation efficiency that can make it
>>>>> acceptable...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Has these codes been opened about the implementation in some
>>>> community or not ?
>>> The old GRUB scheduler for Linux was used for some experiments
>>> published in a paper
>>> at RTLWS 2007, and of course the code was open-source (released
>>> under GPL).
>>> It required a patch for the Linux kernel (I used a 2.6.something
>>> kernel) which allowed
>>> to load the scheduler as a kernel module (yes, I know this is the
>>> wrong way to go...
>>> But implementing it like this was simpler :).
>>> That is very old code... I probably still have it somewhere, but I
>>> have to search
>>> for it. If someone is interested, I can try to search (the story of
>>> the user-space
>>> daemon for adaptive reservations is similar: I released it as
>>> open-source years ago...
>>> If anyone is interested I can search for this code too)
>>>
>>>
>>> Luca
>>>
>> I'm glad that you reply this email. yes, I'm so interesting about
>> your solution. In fact , there are scenarios
>> in our product. Could you send me a link if you have? I can test
>> your solution in our scene if you like.
> Ok, so I found my old code for the CBS scheduler with GRUB modifications.
> You can get it from here:
> http://disi.unitn.it/~abeni/old-cbs-scheduler.tgz
>
> Please note that:
> 1) This is old code (for 2.6.x kernels), written before SCHED_DEADLINE
> development
> was started
> 2) The scheduler architecture is completely different respect to the
> current one,
> but the basic scheduling algorithm implemented by my old scheduler
> is the same
> one implemented by SCHED_DEADLINE (but I did not implement
> multi-processor support :)
> 3) You can have a look at the modifications needed to implement GRUB
> by simply grepping
> for "GRUB" in the source code. Basically, the algorithm is
> implemented by:
> 1) Implementing a state machine to keep track of the current state
> of a task (is it
> using its reserved fraction of CPU time, did it already use such
> a fraction of CPU
> time, or is it not using any CPU time?). This is done by adding
> a "state" field in
> "cbs_struct", and properly updating it in cbs.c
> 2) Keeping track of the total fraction of CPU time used by the
> active tasks. See the "U"
> variable in cbs.c (in a modern scheduler, it should probably
> become a field in the
> runqueue structure)
> 3) Modifying the rule used to update the runtime. For a "standard"
> CBS without CPU
> reclaiming (the one implemented by SCHED_DEADLINE), if a task
> executes for an amount
> of time "delta" its runtime must be decreased by delta. For
> GRUB, it must be decreased
> by "delta" mutliplied by U. See "account()" in cbs.c.
> The "trick" is in properly updating U (and this is done using
> the state machine
> mentioned above)
>
> Summing up, this code is not directly usable, but it shows you what
> needs to be done in
> order to implement the GRUB mechanism for CPU reclaiming in a CBS
> scheduler...
>
>
Thanks for giving me your solution. I will take a look at it and modify
it in our scene later.
Thanks
Yan
>
> Luca
>
> .
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-20 2:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <537348DA.7080001@huawei.com>
[not found] ` <20140514113245.GZ11096@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
2014-05-14 12:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
[not found] ` <53736CD9.90805@unitn.it>
[not found] ` <5374A335.90705@huawei.com>
2014-05-15 12:31 ` Juri Lelli
2014-05-16 7:11 ` Henrik Austad
2014-05-21 12:45 ` Luca Abeni
2014-06-17 2:43 ` xiaofeng.yan
2014-06-17 8:01 ` Luca Abeni
2014-06-18 7:01 ` xiaofeng.yan
2014-06-19 9:13 ` Luca Abeni
2014-06-20 2:29 ` xiaofeng.yan [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53A39C73.2070004@huawei.com \
--to=xiaofeng.yan@huawei.com \
--cc=duzhiping.du@huawei.com \
--cc=harald.gustafsson@ericsson.com \
--cc=henrik@austad.us \
--cc=juri.lelli@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luca.abeni@unitn.it \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=raistlin@linux.it \
--cc=tkhai@yandex.ru \
--cc=xiaofeng.yan2012@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome