From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
"Wysocki, Rafael J" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com" <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, MCE: Kill CPU_POST_DEAD
Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 21:55:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140522195538.GM4383@pd.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3908561D78D1C84285E8C5FCA982C28F328133C0@ORSMSX114.amr.corp.intel.com>
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 03:50:21PM +0000, Luck, Tony wrote:
> >> So I think we can reduce it to just the one rwsem (with recursion) if we
> >> shoot CPU_POST_DEAD in the head.
> >
> > Here's the first bullet. Stressing my box here with Steve's hotplug
> > script seems to work fine.
> >
> > Tony, any objections?
>
> what was this comment referring to:
>
> /* intentionally ignoring frozen here */
>
> After you move the cmci_rediscover() call, it is now in a place where we are
> no longer ignoring frozen (i.e. the old placement did the rediscover even if the
> CPU_TASKS_FROZEN bit was set - with the new placement we will skip rediscovery.
>
> So we were working around some interaction between cpu hotplug and frozen.
> Do we no longer need to do that?
Hmm, that FROZEN thing is supposedly for hotplug operations while
suspend is happening. I guess it makes a little sense to rediscover CMCI
banks while suspend is in progress. Whatever.
Let's keep it before more crap ensues, that was a good catch, thanks.
So, I guess something like that instead.
Which means, I'd need to run a couple of suspend/resume rounds while
hotplugging cores to see whether we're still kosher.
More fun tomorrow.
---
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 16:40:54 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] x86, MCE: Kill CPU_POST_DEAD
In conjunction with cleaning up CPU hotplug, we want to get rid of
CPU_POST_DEAD. Kill this instance here and rediscover CMCI banks at the
end of CPU_DEAD.
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c | 9 ++++-----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
index 68317c80de7f..bfde4871848f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
@@ -2391,6 +2391,10 @@ mce_cpu_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb, unsigned long action, void *hcpu)
threshold_cpu_callback(action, cpu);
mce_device_remove(cpu);
mce_intel_hcpu_update(cpu);
+
+ /* intentionally ignoring frozen here */
+ if (!(action & CPU_TASKS_FROZEN))
+ cmci_rediscover();
break;
case CPU_DOWN_PREPARE:
smp_call_function_single(cpu, mce_disable_cpu, &action, 1);
@@ -2402,11 +2406,6 @@ mce_cpu_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb, unsigned long action, void *hcpu)
break;
}
- if (action == CPU_POST_DEAD) {
- /* intentionally ignoring frozen here */
- cmci_rediscover();
- }
-
return NOTIFY_OK;
}
--
1.9.0
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-22 19:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-22 9:23 [PATCH] intel_rapl: Correct hotplug correction Borislav Petkov
2014-05-22 9:43 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2014-05-22 10:08 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-05-22 11:54 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2014-05-22 12:13 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-05-22 12:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-22 15:30 ` [PATCH] x86, MCE: Kill CPU_POST_DEAD Borislav Petkov
2014-05-22 15:50 ` Luck, Tony
2014-05-22 19:55 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2014-05-22 21:13 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2014-05-22 21:31 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-05-22 21:40 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2014-05-22 21:43 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2014-05-26 20:01 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-05-22 21:31 ` [PATCH] intel_rapl: Correct hotplug correction Srivatsa S. Bhat
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140522195538.GM4383@pd.tnic \
--to=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
--cc=srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®