* [PATCH] regmap: irq: Fix possible ZERO_SIZE_PTR pointer dereferencing error.
@ 2014-05-19 7:13 Xiubo Li
2014-05-19 16:15 ` Mark Brown
2014-05-26 15:37 ` Mark Brown
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Xiubo Li @ 2014-05-19 7:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: broonie; +Cc: gregkh, linux-kernel, Xiubo Li
Since we cannot make sure the 'chip->num_regs' will always be none zero
from the users, and then if 'chip->num_regs' equals to zero by mistake
or other reasons, the kzalloc() will return ZERO_SIZE_PTR, which equals
to ((void *)16).
So this patch fix this with just checking the 'chip->num_regs' before
calling kzalloc().
This also sorts the header files in alphabetical order at the same time.
Signed-off-by: Xiubo Li <Li.Xiubo@freescale.com>
---
drivers/base/regmap/regmap-irq.c | 9 ++++++---
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/base/regmap/regmap-irq.c b/drivers/base/regmap/regmap-irq.c
index edf88f2..6299a50 100644
--- a/drivers/base/regmap/regmap-irq.c
+++ b/drivers/base/regmap/regmap-irq.c
@@ -10,13 +10,13 @@
* published by the Free Software Foundation.
*/
-#include <linux/export.h>
#include <linux/device.h>
-#include <linux/regmap.h>
-#include <linux/irq.h>
+#include <linux/export.h>
#include <linux/interrupt.h>
+#include <linux/irq.h>
#include <linux/irqdomain.h>
#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
+#include <linux/regmap.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include "internal.h"
@@ -347,6 +347,9 @@ int regmap_add_irq_chip(struct regmap *map, int irq, int irq_flags,
int ret = -ENOMEM;
u32 reg;
+ if (chip->num_regs <= 0)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
for (i = 0; i < chip->num_irqs; i++) {
if (chip->irqs[i].reg_offset % map->reg_stride)
return -EINVAL;
--
1.8.4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] regmap: irq: Fix possible ZERO_SIZE_PTR pointer dereferencing error.
2014-05-19 7:13 [PATCH] regmap: irq: Fix possible ZERO_SIZE_PTR pointer dereferencing error Xiubo Li
@ 2014-05-19 16:15 ` Mark Brown
2014-05-19 23:51 ` Li.Xiubo
2014-05-26 15:37 ` Mark Brown
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2014-05-19 16:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Xiubo Li; +Cc: gregkh, linux-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 626 bytes --]
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 03:13:45PM +0800, Xiubo Li wrote:
> Since we cannot make sure the 'chip->num_regs' will always be none zero
> from the users, and then if 'chip->num_regs' equals to zero by mistake
> or other reasons, the kzalloc() will return ZERO_SIZE_PTR, which equals
> to ((void *)16).
>
> So this patch fix this with just checking the 'chip->num_regs' before
> calling kzalloc().
Where is the actual dereference that's being protected against here?
> This also sorts the header files in alphabetical order at the same time.
No, don't do things like this. It just makes things harder to review.
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH] regmap: irq: Fix possible ZERO_SIZE_PTR pointer dereferencing error.
2014-05-19 16:15 ` Mark Brown
@ 2014-05-19 23:51 ` Li.Xiubo
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Li.Xiubo @ 2014-05-19 23:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark Brown; +Cc: gregkh, linux-kernel
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] regmap: irq: Fix possible ZERO_SIZE_PTR pointer
> dereferencing error.
>
> On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 03:13:45PM +0800, Xiubo Li wrote:
> > Since we cannot make sure the 'chip->num_regs' will always be none zero
> > from the users, and then if 'chip->num_regs' equals to zero by mistake
> > or other reasons, the kzalloc() will return ZERO_SIZE_PTR, which equals
> > to ((void *)16).
> >
> > So this patch fix this with just checking the 'chip->num_regs' before
> > calling kzalloc().
>
> Where is the actual dereference that's being protected against here?
>
Such as:
d->mask_buf = kzalloc(sizeof(unsigned int) * chip->num_regs,
GFP_KERNEL);
if (!d->mask_buf)
goto err_alloc;
And then:
d->mask_buf[irq_data->reg_offset / map->reg_stride] |= irq_data->mask;
> > This also sorts the header files in alphabetical order at the same time.
>
> No, don't do things like this. It just makes things harder to review.
Okay, I'll follow your advice.
Thanks,
BRs
Xiubo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] regmap: irq: Fix possible ZERO_SIZE_PTR pointer dereferencing error.
2014-05-19 7:13 [PATCH] regmap: irq: Fix possible ZERO_SIZE_PTR pointer dereferencing error Xiubo Li
2014-05-19 16:15 ` Mark Brown
@ 2014-05-26 15:37 ` Mark Brown
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2014-05-26 15:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Xiubo Li; +Cc: gregkh, linux-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 316 bytes --]
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 03:13:45PM +0800, Xiubo Li wrote:
> Since we cannot make sure the 'chip->num_regs' will always be none zero
> from the users, and then if 'chip->num_regs' equals to zero by mistake
> or other reasons, the kzalloc() will return ZERO_SIZE_PTR, which equals
> to ((void *)16).
Applied, thanks.
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-05-26 15:38 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-05-19 7:13 [PATCH] regmap: irq: Fix possible ZERO_SIZE_PTR pointer dereferencing error Xiubo Li
2014-05-19 16:15 ` Mark Brown
2014-05-19 23:51 ` Li.Xiubo
2014-05-26 15:37 ` Mark Brown
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®