From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: wsa@the-dreams.de, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linus.walleij@linaro.org,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] i2c: Make I2C ID tables non-mandatory for DT'ed and/or ACPI'ed devices
Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2014 11:27:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140605102737.4ED08C40A4D@trevor.secretlab.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1401883796-17841-6-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org>
On Wed, 4 Jun 2014 13:09:54 +0100, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote:
> Currently the I2C framework insists on devices supplying an I2C ID
> table. Many of the devices which do so unnecessarily adding quite a
> few wasted lines to kernel code. This patch allows drivers a means
> to 'not' supply the aforementioned table and match on either DT
> and/or ACPI match tables instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Looks okay to me. I've not applied or tested in any way though.
Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
> index e8c2cba..71970da 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
> @@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ static int i2c_device_match(struct device *dev, struct device_driver *drv)
>
>
> /* Attempt an OF style match */
> - if (of_driver_match_device(dev, drv))
> + if (i2c_of_match_device(drv->of_match_table, dev))
> return 1;
>
> /* Then ACPI style match */
> @@ -268,7 +268,18 @@ static int i2c_device_probe(struct device *dev)
> return 0;
>
> driver = to_i2c_driver(dev->driver);
> - if (!driver->probe || !driver->id_table)
> + if (!driver->probe)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + /*
> + * An I2C ID table is not mandatory, if and only if, a suitable Device
> + * Tree and/or ACPI match table entry is supplied for the probing
> + * device.
> + *
> + * TODO: Provide 'device type' to 'ACPI node' call and match here.
> + */
> + if (!driver->id_table &&
> + !i2c_of_match_device(dev->driver->of_match_table, dev))
> return -ENODEV;
>
> if (!device_can_wakeup(&client->dev))
> --
> 1.8.3.2
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-05 10:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-04 12:09 [PATCH 0/7] i2c: Relax mandatory I2C ID table passing Lee Jones
2014-06-04 12:09 ` [PATCH 1/7] ACPICA: Only include ACPI asm files if ACPI is enabled Lee Jones
2014-06-04 12:35 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-06-04 12:51 ` Lee Jones
2014-06-04 21:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-06-05 1:01 ` Zheng, Lv
2014-06-05 1:14 ` Zheng, Lv
2014-06-05 4:11 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-06-05 4:46 ` Zheng, Lv
2014-06-05 0:56 ` Zheng, Lv
2014-06-05 4:06 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-06-04 12:09 ` [PATCH 2/7] i2c: Add pointer dereference protection to i2c_match_id() Lee Jones
2014-06-04 12:09 ` [PATCH 3/7] i2c: Add the ability to match device to compatible string without an of_node Lee Jones
2014-06-04 17:29 ` Rob Herring
2014-06-04 17:55 ` Lee Jones
2014-06-05 17:36 ` Grant Likely
2014-06-06 8:10 ` Lee Jones
2014-06-06 23:39 ` Grant Likely
2014-06-04 12:09 ` [PATCH 4/7] i2c: Match using traditional OF methods, then by vendor-less compatible strings Lee Jones
2014-06-04 12:09 ` [PATCH 5/7] i2c: Make I2C ID tables non-mandatory for DT'ed and/or ACPI'ed devices Lee Jones
2014-06-05 10:27 ` Grant Likely [this message]
2014-06-04 12:09 ` [PATCH 6/7] of/device: Allow I2C devices to OF match without supplying an OF node Lee Jones
2014-06-04 12:09 ` [PATCH 7/7] OF/ACPI/I2C: Add generic match function for the aforementioned systems Lee Jones
2014-06-04 12:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-06-04 12:51 ` Mika Westerberg
2014-06-04 13:28 ` Lee Jones
2014-06-05 8:00 ` Mika Westerberg
2014-06-05 8:20 ` Lee Jones
2014-06-05 10:32 ` Grant Likely
2014-06-05 10:30 ` Grant Likely
2014-06-05 10:37 ` Lee Jones
2014-06-05 15:41 ` Grant Likely
2014-06-05 15:55 ` Lee Jones
2014-06-05 17:37 ` Grant Likely
2014-06-06 10:24 ` Mark Brown
2014-06-06 12:36 ` Lee Jones
2014-06-06 23:42 ` Grant Likely
2014-06-07 9:31 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140605102737.4ED08C40A4D@trevor.secretlab.ca \
--to=grant.likely@linaro.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®