From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>,
Linux I2C <linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] OF/ACPI/I2C: Add generic match function for the aforementioned systems
Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2014 10:31:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140607093113.GY5099@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140606234253.A4E25C427F0@trevor.secretlab.ca>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1898 bytes --]
On Sat, Jun 07, 2014 at 12:42:53AM +0100, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Jun 2014 13:36:53 +0100, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote:
> > On Fri, 06 Jun 2014, Mark Brown wrote:
> > > > I've also been mulling over the idea of removing the second probe()
> > > > parameter, as suggested by Wolfram. However, this has quite deep
> > > > ramifications which would require a great deal of driver adaptions.
> > > If you're going to do that another option is to refactor the probe()
> > > function to take the driver_data as an argument and then have the core
> > > pass that from whatever table it matched from rather than the entire
> > > i2c_device_id structure. That way the driver just needs to supply all
> > > the ID tables mapping binding information to whatever it needs and the
> > > core can pass in the driver data from whatever table it matched against.
> > Unfortunately this means we're back to the aforementioned typing
> > issue. For struct {platform,i2c,spi,acpi,etc}_device_id the driver
> > data is a kernel ulong but the of_device_id's driver data attribute is
> > a void*.
> We're actually okay there. Each subsystem defines it's own convention
> about what those values mean. ulong and void* are the same size and
> every user I've seen stuffs the same data into the data field of both
> tables.
Indeed - if we're going to go with that approach it seems to me like we
should just pick one and put any casting in the core.
> > I've just started work on a migration over to a new probe(). I don't
> > think it's all that much work, but if there are any objections I'd
> > prefer to hear them now rather than waste any time.
> I have no problem with that approach.
Converting probe() makes sense to me. I think I would prefer to see the
ID lookup handled as an argument to probe() rather than with functions
in probe() but it's not the end of the world if it isn't.
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-07 9:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-04 12:09 [PATCH 0/7] i2c: Relax mandatory I2C ID table passing Lee Jones
2014-06-04 12:09 ` [PATCH 1/7] ACPICA: Only include ACPI asm files if ACPI is enabled Lee Jones
2014-06-04 12:35 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-06-04 12:51 ` Lee Jones
2014-06-04 21:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-06-05 1:01 ` Zheng, Lv
2014-06-05 1:14 ` Zheng, Lv
2014-06-05 4:11 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-06-05 4:46 ` Zheng, Lv
2014-06-05 0:56 ` Zheng, Lv
2014-06-05 4:06 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-06-04 12:09 ` [PATCH 2/7] i2c: Add pointer dereference protection to i2c_match_id() Lee Jones
2014-06-04 12:09 ` [PATCH 3/7] i2c: Add the ability to match device to compatible string without an of_node Lee Jones
2014-06-04 17:29 ` Rob Herring
2014-06-04 17:55 ` Lee Jones
2014-06-05 17:36 ` Grant Likely
2014-06-06 8:10 ` Lee Jones
2014-06-06 23:39 ` Grant Likely
2014-06-04 12:09 ` [PATCH 4/7] i2c: Match using traditional OF methods, then by vendor-less compatible strings Lee Jones
2014-06-04 12:09 ` [PATCH 5/7] i2c: Make I2C ID tables non-mandatory for DT'ed and/or ACPI'ed devices Lee Jones
2014-06-05 10:27 ` Grant Likely
2014-06-04 12:09 ` [PATCH 6/7] of/device: Allow I2C devices to OF match without supplying an OF node Lee Jones
2014-06-04 12:09 ` [PATCH 7/7] OF/ACPI/I2C: Add generic match function for the aforementioned systems Lee Jones
2014-06-04 12:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-06-04 12:51 ` Mika Westerberg
2014-06-04 13:28 ` Lee Jones
2014-06-05 8:00 ` Mika Westerberg
2014-06-05 8:20 ` Lee Jones
2014-06-05 10:32 ` Grant Likely
2014-06-05 10:30 ` Grant Likely
2014-06-05 10:37 ` Lee Jones
2014-06-05 15:41 ` Grant Likely
2014-06-05 15:55 ` Lee Jones
2014-06-05 17:37 ` Grant Likely
2014-06-06 10:24 ` Mark Brown
2014-06-06 12:36 ` Lee Jones
2014-06-06 23:42 ` Grant Likely
2014-06-07 9:31 ` Mark Brown [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140607093113.GY5099@sirena.org.uk \
--to=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
--cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®