mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Gioh Kim <gioh.kim@lge.com>
Cc: "Laura Abbott" <lauraa@codeaurora.org>,
	"Michal Nazarewicz" <mina86@mina86.com>,
	"Marek Szyprowski" <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
	"Joonsoo Kim" <js1304@gmail.com>,
	"Alexander Viro" <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	이건호 <gunho.lee@lge.com>, "Gi-Oh Kim" <gurugio@gmail.com>,
	"Marek Szyprowski" <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] CMA: clear buffer-head lru before page migration
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2014 15:52:52 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140707155252.15e81dff6683393ba3590478@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53B664E5.5060102@lge.com>

On Fri, 04 Jul 2014 17:25:09 +0900 Gioh Kim <gioh.kim@lge.com> wrote:

> From: Gioh Kim <gioh.kim@lge.com>
> Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2014 16:53:22 +0900
> Subject: [PATCH] [RFC] CMA: clear buffer-head lru before page migration
> 
> When CMA try to migrate page, some buffer-heads can exist on lru.
> The bh on lru has non-zero count value so that it cannot be dropped
> even-if it is not used. We can drop only buffers related to the
> migrated page, but it can take long time more than dropping all
> because of searching list. There all buffers in lru are dropped.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott <lauraa@codeaurora.org>
> Signed-off-by: Gioh Kim <gioh.kim@lge.com>
> ---
>  fs/buffer.c |   13 +++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/buffer.c b/fs/buffer.c
> index eba6e4f..4f11b7a 100644
> --- a/fs/buffer.c
> +++ b/fs/buffer.c
> @@ -3233,6 +3233,19 @@ int try_to_free_buffers(struct page *page)
>         if (PageWriteback(page))
>                 return 0;
> 
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CMA
> +       /*
> +        * When CMA try to migrate page, some buffer-heads can exist on lru.
> +        * The bh on lru has non-zero count value so that it cannot
> +        * be dropped even-if it is not used.
> +        * We can drop only buffers related to the migrated page,
> +        * but it can take long time more than dropping all
> +        * because of searching list.
> +        * There all buffers in lru are dropped first.
> +        */
> +       invalidate_bh_lrus();
> +#endif

No, this will be tremendously expensive.

What I proposed is that CMA call invalidate_bh_lrus() right at the
outset.  Something along the lines of

--- a/mm/page_alloc.c~a
+++ a/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -6329,6 +6329,14 @@ int alloc_contig_range(unsigned long sta
 	};
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cc.migratepages);
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_CMA
+	/*
+	 * Comment goes here
+	 */
+	if (migratetype == MIGRATE_CMA)
+		invalidate_bh_lrus();
+#endif
+
 	/*
 	 * What we do here is we mark all pageblocks in range as
 	 * MIGRATE_ISOLATE.  Because pageblock and max order pages may


- I'd have thought that it would make sense to do this for huge pages
  as well (MIGRATE_MOVABLE) but nobody really seems to know.

- There's a patch floating around ("Allow increasing the buffer-head
  per-CPU LRU size") which will double the size of the bh lrus, so this
  all becomes more important.

- alloc_contig_range() does lru_add_drain_all() and drain_all_pages()
  *after* performing the allocation.  I can't work out why this is the
  case and of course it is undocumented.  If this is indeed not a bug
  then probably the invalidate_bh_lrus() should happen in the same
  place.

  reply	other threads:[~2014-07-07 22:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-07-04  8:25 Gioh Kim
2014-07-07 22:52 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2014-07-08  4:44   ` Gioh Kim
2014-07-08  4:48     ` Andrew Morton
2014-07-08 16:46   ` Michal Nazarewicz
2014-07-14  7:02     ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-07-14 15:25       ` Michal Nazarewicz
2014-07-14 20:37       ` Andrew Morton
2014-07-15  6:25         ` Gioh Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140707155252.15e81dff6683393ba3590478@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=gioh.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=gunho.lee@lge.com \
    --cc=gurugio@gmail.com \
    --cc=js1304@gmail.com \
    --cc=lauraa@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=mina86@mina86.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®