From: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
To: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>
Cc: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Gioh Kim" <gioh.kim@lge.com>,
"Laura Abbott" <lauraa@codeaurora.org>,
"Marek Szyprowski" <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
"Alexander Viro" <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
이건호 <gunho.lee@lge.com>, "Gi-Oh Kim" <gurugio@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] CMA: clear buffer-head lru before page migration
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 16:02:25 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140714070225.GE11317@js1304-P5Q-DELUXE> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xa1tpphf4x3s.fsf@mina86.com>
On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 06:46:31PM +0200, Michal Nazarewicz wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 07 2014, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > What I proposed is that CMA call invalidate_bh_lrus() right at the
> > outset. Something along the lines of
> >
> > --- a/mm/page_alloc.c~a
> > +++ a/mm/page_alloc.c
> > @@ -6329,6 +6329,14 @@ int alloc_contig_range(unsigned long sta
> > };
> > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cc.migratepages);
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_CMA
> > + /*
> > + * Comment goes here
> > + */
> > + if (migratetype == MIGRATE_CMA)
> > + invalidate_bh_lrus();
> > +#endif
> > +
>
> This seems reasonable, except I think it should go after
> start_isolate_page_range call because otherwise there's no guarantee
> that someone won't grab those pages back.
>
> Also to avoid the #ifdef perhaps we want this as well:
I think that we just want to remove ifdef CONFIG_CMA on above code
snippet, because invalidate_bh_lrus() would also help user of
alloc_contig_range() with MIGRATE_MOVABLE.
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/mmzone.h b/include/linux/mmzone.h
> index 6cbd1b6..2640a55 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mmzone.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mmzone.h
> @@ -64,10 +64,11 @@ enum {
> };
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_CMA
> -# define is_migrate_cma(migratetype) unlikely((migratetype) == MIGRATE_CMA)
> +# define __is_migrate_cma(migratetype) ((migratetype) == MIGRATE_CMA)
> #else
> -# define is_migrate_cma(migratetype) false
> +# define __is_migrate_cma(migratetype) false
> #endif
> +#define is_migrate_cma(migratetype) unlikely(__is_migrate_cma(migratetype))
>
> #define for_each_migratetype_order(order, type) \
> for (order = 0; order < MAX_ORDER; order++) \
>
> and then use “if (__is_migrate_cma(migratetype))”.
>
> > /*
> > * What we do here is we mark all pageblocks in range as
> > * MIGRATE_ISOLATE. Because pageblock and max order pages may
> >
> >
> > - I'd have thought that it would make sense to do this for huge pages
> > as well (MIGRATE_MOVABLE) but nobody really seems to know.
> >
> > - There's a patch floating around ("Allow increasing the buffer-head
> > per-CPU LRU size") which will double the size of the bh lrus, so this
> > all becomes more important.
> >
> > - alloc_contig_range() does lru_add_drain_all() and drain_all_pages()
> > *after* performing the allocation. I can't work out why this is the
> > case and of course it is undocumented. If this is indeed not a bug
> > then probably the invalidate_bh_lrus() should happen in the same
> > place.
>
> The purpose is to get free non-buddy pages (so pages on PCP lists for
> instance) back onto the buddy list. It's safe to move those calls above
> the call to __alloc_contig_migrate_range, but I don't think it will
> change anything (except of course the fact that if migration fails,
> we'll do the draining for nothing).
At a glance, we don't need that drain_all_pages(), because
drain_all_pages() is also called by set_migratetype_isolate() after changing
migratetype.
And, it is better to move up lru_add_drain_all() to ahead of
__alloc_contig_migrate_range(), because some pages could be skipped
to migrate due to this lru page caching mechanism.
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-14 6:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-04 8:25 Gioh Kim
2014-07-07 22:52 ` Andrew Morton
2014-07-08 4:44 ` Gioh Kim
2014-07-08 4:48 ` Andrew Morton
2014-07-08 16:46 ` Michal Nazarewicz
2014-07-14 7:02 ` Joonsoo Kim [this message]
2014-07-14 15:25 ` Michal Nazarewicz
2014-07-14 20:37 ` Andrew Morton
2014-07-15 6:25 ` Gioh Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140714070225.GE11317@js1304-P5Q-DELUXE \
--to=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=gioh.kim@lge.com \
--cc=gunho.lee@lge.com \
--cc=gurugio@gmail.com \
--cc=lauraa@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=mina86@mina86.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®