From: Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com, arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com,
len.brown@intel.com, alan.cox@intel.com, mark.gross@intel.com,
pjt@google.com, fengguang.wu@intel.com,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] sched: Rewrite per entity runnable load average tracking
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2014 04:03:42 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140707200342.GA25653@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140707104646.GK6758@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Thanks, Peter.
On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 12:46:46PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> That tg->load_avg cacheline is already red hot glowing, and you've just
> increased the amount of updates to it.. That's not going to be pleasant.
>
Logically, this rewrite updates tg->load_avg as soon as it is changed. But
technically, this is not necessary, as it is only needed to be updated when
it is used before update_cfs_shares() and update_cfs_rq_h_load().
Yes, I can optimize it.
> So here you add the task to the cfs_rq avg when its got migrate in,
> however:
>
> > @@ -4552,17 +4326,9 @@ migrate_task_rq_fair(struct task_struct *p, int next_cpu)
> > struct sched_entity *se = &p->se;
> > struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
> >
> > + /* Update task on old CPU, then ready to go (entity must be off the queue) */
> > + __update_load_avg(cfs_rq_clock_task(cfs_rq), &se->avg, 0);
> > + se->avg.last_update_time = 0;
> >
> > /* We have migrated, no longer consider this task hot */
> > se->exec_start = 0;
>
> there you don't remove it first..
>
Yes, I missed it. I wonder what I was thinking. Migration is the only reason
to track task load average...
Yuyang
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-08 4:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-02 2:30 [PATCH 1/2] sched: Remove update_rq_runnable_avg Yuyang Du
2014-07-02 2:30 ` [PATCH 2/2] sched: Rewrite per entity runnable load average tracking Yuyang Du
2014-07-07 10:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-07 10:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-07 20:03 ` Yuyang Du [this message]
2014-07-07 22:25 ` bsegall
2014-07-08 0:08 ` Yuyang Du
2014-07-08 17:04 ` bsegall
2014-07-09 1:07 ` Yuyang Du
2014-07-09 17:08 ` bsegall
2014-07-09 18:39 ` Yuyang Du
2014-07-09 18:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-09 19:07 ` bsegall
2014-07-10 10:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-10 17:01 ` bsegall
2014-07-10 19:53 ` Yuyang Du
2014-07-10 23:22 ` Yuyang Du
2014-07-11 8:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-11 0:52 ` Yuyang Du
2014-07-11 2:01 ` Yuyang Du
2014-07-09 23:30 ` Yuyang Du
2014-07-10 17:06 ` bsegall
2014-07-10 20:08 ` Yuyang Du
2014-07-08 12:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140707200342.GA25653@intel.com \
--to=yuyang.du@intel.com \
--cc=alan.cox@intel.com \
--cc=arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.gross@intel.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome