From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Havard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@google.com>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ewout van Bekkum <ewout@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] x86-mce: Modify CMCI poll interval to adjust for small check_interval values.
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2014 21:17:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140709191747.GB5249@pd.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1404925766-32253-2-git-send-email-hskinnemoen@google.com>
On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 10:09:21AM -0700, Havard Skinnemoen wrote:
> From: Ewout van Bekkum <ewout@google.com>
>
> The CMCI poll interval was updated to pick the minimum interval between
> the original 30 seconds and the check_interval divided by 8 (minimum of
> 3 polls).
Why min 3 polls? How do you come up with exactly that frequency?
> This resolves a bug where the CMCI storm handler is unable to return to
> interrupt mode from polling mode, if the check_interval shorter than the
> CMCI poll interval. This problem is caused by the mce_timer_fn function
> which only allows the poll interval to be incremented up to the
> check_interval, while the mce_intel_adjust_timer function requires the
> poll interval to be greater than the CMCI poll interval before leaving
> the CMCI_STORM_ACTIVE state.
Interesting. So it seems you guys want to set the check_interval to
something < 30 secs.
Out of curiosity, what is your use case which requires such small
check_interval setting?
Maybe we need to redesign and simplify this intervals thing to make it
more user-friendly...
Btw, on a related note, we're working on a small mechanism which
collects correctable errors in the kernel and when a certain count for a
physical error address has been reached, we soft-offline that page. We'd
appreciate it if you guys took a look and told us whether it makes sense
to you:
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1404242623-10094-1-git-send-email-bp@alien8.de
Thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-09 19:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-09 17:09 [PATCH 0/6] x86 mce fixes Havard Skinnemoen
2014-07-09 17:09 ` [PATCH 1/6] x86-mce: Modify CMCI poll interval to adjust for small check_interval values Havard Skinnemoen
2014-07-09 19:17 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2014-07-09 21:24 ` Havard Skinnemoen
2014-07-10 9:01 ` Chen, Gong
2014-07-10 17:16 ` Havard Skinnemoen
2014-07-11 2:12 ` Chen, Gong
2014-07-10 11:42 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-07-10 17:51 ` Havard Skinnemoen
2014-07-10 18:55 ` Tony Luck
2014-07-10 22:45 ` Havard Skinnemoen
2014-07-11 15:35 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-07-11 18:56 ` Havard Skinnemoen
2014-07-11 20:10 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-07-11 20:39 ` Havard Skinnemoen
2014-07-14 14:57 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-07-11 20:22 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-07-12 0:10 ` Havard Skinnemoen
2014-07-14 15:14 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-07-11 20:36 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-07-11 21:05 ` Havard Skinnemoen
2014-07-09 17:09 ` [PATCH 2/6] x86-mce: Modify CMCI storm exit to reenable instead of rediscover banks Havard Skinnemoen
2014-07-09 20:20 ` Luck, Tony
2014-07-09 21:34 ` Havard Skinnemoen
2014-07-10 15:51 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-07-10 18:32 ` Havard Skinnemoen
2014-07-09 17:09 ` [PATCH 3/6] x86-mce: Clear CMCI enable on all claimed CMCI banks before reboot Havard Skinnemoen
2014-07-09 20:36 ` Luck, Tony
2014-07-09 21:40 ` Havard Skinnemoen
2014-07-10 16:24 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-07-10 16:33 ` Tony Luck
2014-07-10 17:56 ` Havard Skinnemoen
2014-07-10 18:27 ` Tony Luck
2014-07-10 18:30 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-07-09 17:09 ` [PATCH 4/6] x86-mce: Add spinlocks to prevent duplicated MCP and CMCI reports Havard Skinnemoen
2014-07-09 20:35 ` Andi Kleen
2014-07-09 21:51 ` Havard Skinnemoen
2014-07-09 23:32 ` Luck, Tony
2014-07-10 8:16 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-07-09 20:47 ` Luck, Tony
2014-07-09 21:56 ` Havard Skinnemoen
2014-07-10 16:41 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-07-10 18:03 ` Havard Skinnemoen
2014-07-10 18:44 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-07-10 18:57 ` Tony Luck
2014-07-10 19:12 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-07-11 9:24 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-07-11 19:06 ` Tony Luck
2014-07-11 19:52 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-07-11 21:15 ` Havard Skinnemoen
2014-07-17 10:50 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-07-18 21:23 ` Tony Luck
2014-07-18 21:31 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-07-09 17:09 ` [PATCH 5/6] x86-mce: check if no_way_out applies before deciding not to clear MCE banks Havard Skinnemoen
2014-07-09 21:00 ` Luck, Tony
2014-07-09 23:00 ` Havard Skinnemoen
2014-07-09 23:27 ` Luck, Tony
2014-07-10 16:49 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-07-09 17:09 ` [PATCH 6/6] x86-mce: ensure the MCP timer is not already set in the mce_timer_fn Havard Skinnemoen
2014-07-09 21:04 ` Luck, Tony
2014-07-09 23:01 ` Havard Skinnemoen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140709191747.GB5249@pd.tnic \
--to=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=ewout@google.com \
--cc=hskinnemoen@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®