From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Corey Ashford <cjashfor@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@linaro.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 00/19] perf tools: Factor ordered samples queue
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 11:19:58 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140724141958.GB7831@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53CD5DC6.3030605@gmail.com>
Em Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 12:36:54PM -0600, David Ahern escreveu:
> On 7/21/14, 12:23 PM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> >On 21/07/2014 7:31 p.m., Andi Kleen wrote:
> >>Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> writes:
> >>>
> >>>[jolsa@ibm-x3650m4-01 perf]$ sudo ./perf report --stdio
> >>>Timestamp below last timeslice flush
> >>>0x2276f58 [0x68]: failed to process type: 9
> >>
> >>FWIW we're seeing this frequently too.
> >
> >Jiri's example didn't work for me. Do you have one?
>
> $ perf sched record -m 8192 -- perf bench sched all
> # Running sched/messaging benchmark...
> # 20 sender and receiver processes per group
> # 10 groups == 400 processes run
>
> Total time: 0.087 [sec]
>
> # Running sched/pipe benchmark...
> # Executed 1000000 pipe operations between two processes
>
> Total time: 12.043 [sec]
>
> 12.043779 usecs/op
> 83030 ops/sec
>
> [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
> [ perf record: Captured and wrote 289.549 MB perf.data (~12650569 samples) ]
> 0x54b4828 [0]: failed to process type: 0
>
> No overload condition, no dropped chunks message - yet can't process events.
Appling just the patches 1 and 17 from this series I managed to:
[root@zoo ~]# cat /proc/loadavg
52.13 13.06 5.04 132/977 29522
[root@zoo ~]# perf sched record -m 4096 -- perf bench sched all
# Running sched/messaging benchmark...
# 20 sender and receiver processes per group
# 10 groups == 400 processes run
Total time: 0.692 [sec]
# Running sched/pipe benchmark...
# Executed 1000000 pipe operations between two processes
Total time: 13.007 [sec]
13.007582 usecs/op
76878 ops/sec
[ perf record: Woken up 105 times to write data ]
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 909.513 MB perf.data (~39737216 samples) ]
[root@zoo ~]# cat /proc/loadavg
80.30 22.82 8.49 132/968 31755
[root@zoo ~]# perf script | wc -l
8308492
[root@zoo ~]# perf cript | head -10
perf 9897 [01] 1.29678: sched:sched_stat_runtime: comm=perf pid=29897 runtime=916836 [ns] vruntime=1322281938410 [ns]
perf 9897 [01] 1.29683: sched:sched_wakeup: comm=perf pid=29919 prio=120 success=1 target_cpu=001
perf 9897 [01] 1.29688: sched:sched_switch: prev_comm=perf prev_pid=29897 prev_prio=120 prev_state=R ==> next_comm=perf next_pid=29919 next_prio=120
perf 9919 [01] 1.29748: sched:sched_stat_runtime: comm=perf pid=29919 runtime=70430 [ns] vruntime=1322273008840 [ns]
cc1 7110 [03] 1.29748: sched:sched_stat_runtime: comm=cc1 pid=27110 runtime=992012 [ns] vruntime=702438664528 [ns]
cc1 9278 [00] 1.29748: sched:sched_stat_runtime: comm=cc1 pid=29278 runtime=979081 [ns] vruntime=583946650623 [ns]
cc1 7781 [02] 1.29749: sched:sched_stat_runtime: comm=cc1 pid=27781 runtime=989627 [ns] vruntime=714050072391 [ns]
cc1 9278 [00] 1.29756: sched:sched_switch: prev_comm=cc1 prev_pid=29278 prev_prio=120 prev_state=R ==> next_comm=cc1 next_pid=29128 next_prio=120
cc1 7110 [03] 1.29757: sched:sched_switch: prev_comm=cc1 prev_pid=27110 prev_prio=120 prev_state=R ==> next_comm=cc1 next_pid=29586 next_prio=120
perf 9919 [01] 1.29914: sched:sched_wakeup: comm=migration/1 pid=12 prio=0 success=1 target_cpu=001
[root@zoo ~]#
While doing a make -j128 allmodconfig on a 4way machine.
David, can I have your Acked-by for just those two while the rest is debated?
Adrian, can I have yours as well?
- Arnaldo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-24 14:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-20 21:55 Jiri Olsa
2014-07-20 21:55 ` [PATCH 01/19] perf tools: Fix accounting of " Jiri Olsa
2014-07-28 8:27 ` [tip:perf/core] perf session: " tip-bot for Jiri Olsa
2014-07-20 21:55 ` [PATCH 02/19] perf tools: Rename ordered_samples bool to ordered_events Jiri Olsa
2014-07-20 21:55 ` [PATCH 03/19] perf tools: Rename ordered_samples struct " Jiri Olsa
2014-07-20 21:55 ` [PATCH 04/19] perf tools: Rename ordered_events members Jiri Olsa
2014-07-20 21:55 ` [PATCH 05/19] perf tools: Add ordered_events_(new|delete) interface Jiri Olsa
2014-07-20 21:55 ` [PATCH 06/19] perf tools: Factor ordered_events_flush to be more generic Jiri Olsa
2014-07-20 21:55 ` [PATCH 07/19] perf tools: Limit ordered events queue size Jiri Olsa
2014-07-20 21:55 ` [PATCH 08/19] perf tools: Flush ordered events in case of allocation failure Jiri Olsa
2014-07-20 21:55 ` [PATCH 09/19] perf tools: Make perf_session_deliver_event global Jiri Olsa
2014-07-20 21:55 ` [PATCH 10/19] perf tools: Create ordered-events object Jiri Olsa
2014-07-20 21:55 ` [PATCH 11/19] perf tools: Use list_move in ordered_events_delete function Jiri Olsa
2014-07-20 21:55 ` [PATCH 12/19] perf tools: Add ordered_events_init function Jiri Olsa
2014-07-20 21:55 ` [PATCH 13/19] perf tools: Add ordered_events_free function Jiri Olsa
2014-07-20 21:55 ` [PATCH 14/19] perf tools: Add perf_config_u64 function Jiri Olsa
2014-07-20 21:55 ` [PATCH 15/19] perf tools: Add report.queue-size config file option Jiri Olsa
2014-07-20 21:56 ` [PATCH 16/19] perf tools: Add debug prints for ordered events queue Jiri Olsa
2014-07-20 21:56 ` [PATCH 17/19] perf tools: Always force PERF_RECORD_FINISHED_ROUND event Jiri Olsa
2014-07-24 21:34 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2014-07-25 11:34 ` Jiri Olsa
2014-07-25 14:14 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2014-07-25 15:45 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-07-25 16:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-20 21:56 ` [PATCH 18/19] perf tools: Limit the ordered events queue by default to 100MB Jiri Olsa
2014-07-20 21:56 ` [PATCH 19/19] perf tools: Allow out of order messages in forced flush Jiri Olsa
2014-07-21 6:43 ` [PATCHv3 00/19] perf tools: Factor ordered samples queue Adrian Hunter
2014-07-21 8:02 ` Jiri Olsa
2014-07-21 8:47 ` Adrian Hunter
2014-07-21 9:54 ` Jiri Olsa
2014-07-21 12:09 ` Adrian Hunter
2014-07-21 12:35 ` Jiri Olsa
2014-07-21 12:58 ` Adrian Hunter
2014-07-21 16:31 ` Andi Kleen
2014-07-21 18:23 ` Adrian Hunter
2014-07-21 18:36 ` David Ahern
2014-07-21 18:44 ` Adrian Hunter
2014-07-24 14:19 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2014-07-24 14:56 ` Jiri Olsa
2014-07-24 15:10 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2014-07-24 15:20 ` Jiri Olsa
2014-07-24 15:51 ` David Ahern
2014-07-24 18:01 ` Adrian Hunter
2014-07-21 19:39 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140724141958.GB7831@kernel.org \
--to=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=cjashfor@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=jean.pihet@linaro.org \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome