mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	Corey Ashford <cjashfor@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@linaro.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/19] perf tools: Always force PERF_RECORD_FINISHED_ROUND event
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 11:14:13 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140725141413.GK7831@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140725113426.GC1214@krava.brq.redhat.com>

Em Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 01:34:26PM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 06:34:51PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > I think both changes are OK, but should be split in different patches,
 
> right, I'll split it

Thanks!
 
> > [root@zoo /]# perf stat -r 5 perf report --no-ordered-samples > /dev/null
> >    101,171,572,553      instructions              #    1.10  insns per cycle        
> >       30.249514999 seconds time elapsed                                          ( +-  0.48% )

> > [root@zoo /]# perf stat -r 5 perf report --ordered-samples > /dev/null
> >    105,982,144,263      instructions              #    1.04  insns per cycle        
> >       32.636483981 seconds time elapsed                                          ( +-  0.41% )

> so those 2 extra seconds is the ordering time, right? sounds ok

Yeah, but I think its worth investigating if using it is a strict
requirement in all cases, i.e. is it possible to receive out of order
events when sampling on a single CPU? Or a single CPU socket with a
coherent time source? etc.

Providing a way to disable this ordering to be used in corner cases
where it is not a strict requirement and the volume of samples is so
high that reducing processing time like shown above seems to be a
sensible thing to do.

We're in the business of optimizing stuff, huh? :-)
 
- Arnaldo

  reply	other threads:[~2014-07-25 14:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-07-20 21:55 [PATCHv3 00/19] perf tools: Factor ordered samples queue Jiri Olsa
2014-07-20 21:55 ` [PATCH 01/19] perf tools: Fix accounting of " Jiri Olsa
2014-07-28  8:27   ` [tip:perf/core] perf session: " tip-bot for Jiri Olsa
2014-07-20 21:55 ` [PATCH 02/19] perf tools: Rename ordered_samples bool to ordered_events Jiri Olsa
2014-07-20 21:55 ` [PATCH 03/19] perf tools: Rename ordered_samples struct " Jiri Olsa
2014-07-20 21:55 ` [PATCH 04/19] perf tools: Rename ordered_events members Jiri Olsa
2014-07-20 21:55 ` [PATCH 05/19] perf tools: Add ordered_events_(new|delete) interface Jiri Olsa
2014-07-20 21:55 ` [PATCH 06/19] perf tools: Factor ordered_events_flush to be more generic Jiri Olsa
2014-07-20 21:55 ` [PATCH 07/19] perf tools: Limit ordered events queue size Jiri Olsa
2014-07-20 21:55 ` [PATCH 08/19] perf tools: Flush ordered events in case of allocation failure Jiri Olsa
2014-07-20 21:55 ` [PATCH 09/19] perf tools: Make perf_session_deliver_event global Jiri Olsa
2014-07-20 21:55 ` [PATCH 10/19] perf tools: Create ordered-events object Jiri Olsa
2014-07-20 21:55 ` [PATCH 11/19] perf tools: Use list_move in ordered_events_delete function Jiri Olsa
2014-07-20 21:55 ` [PATCH 12/19] perf tools: Add ordered_events_init function Jiri Olsa
2014-07-20 21:55 ` [PATCH 13/19] perf tools: Add ordered_events_free function Jiri Olsa
2014-07-20 21:55 ` [PATCH 14/19] perf tools: Add perf_config_u64 function Jiri Olsa
2014-07-20 21:55 ` [PATCH 15/19] perf tools: Add report.queue-size config file option Jiri Olsa
2014-07-20 21:56 ` [PATCH 16/19] perf tools: Add debug prints for ordered events queue Jiri Olsa
2014-07-20 21:56 ` [PATCH 17/19] perf tools: Always force PERF_RECORD_FINISHED_ROUND event Jiri Olsa
2014-07-24 21:34   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2014-07-25 11:34     ` Jiri Olsa
2014-07-25 14:14       ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2014-07-25 15:45         ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-07-25 16:12           ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-20 21:56 ` [PATCH 18/19] perf tools: Limit the ordered events queue by default to 100MB Jiri Olsa
2014-07-20 21:56 ` [PATCH 19/19] perf tools: Allow out of order messages in forced flush Jiri Olsa
2014-07-21  6:43 ` [PATCHv3 00/19] perf tools: Factor ordered samples queue Adrian Hunter
2014-07-21  8:02   ` Jiri Olsa
2014-07-21  8:47     ` Adrian Hunter
2014-07-21  9:54       ` Jiri Olsa
2014-07-21 12:09         ` Adrian Hunter
2014-07-21 12:35           ` Jiri Olsa
2014-07-21 12:58             ` Adrian Hunter
2014-07-21 16:31         ` Andi Kleen
2014-07-21 18:23           ` Adrian Hunter
2014-07-21 18:36             ` David Ahern
2014-07-21 18:44               ` Adrian Hunter
2014-07-24 14:19               ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2014-07-24 14:56                 ` Jiri Olsa
2014-07-24 15:10                   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2014-07-24 15:20                     ` Jiri Olsa
2014-07-24 15:51                     ` David Ahern
2014-07-24 18:01                 ` Adrian Hunter
2014-07-21 19:39             ` Andi Kleen
2014-07-25 14:55 [PATCHv4 " Jiri Olsa
2014-07-25 14:56 ` [PATCH 17/19] perf tools: Always force PERF_RECORD_FINISHED_ROUND event Jiri Olsa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140725141413.GK7831@kernel.org \
    --to=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=cjashfor@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=jean.pihet@linaro.org \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome