mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Mathias Krause <minipli@googlemail.com>
Cc: Matt Fleming <matt@console-pimps.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 1/3] x86, ptdump: Add section for EFI runtime services
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2014 17:17:31 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141008151730.GB16892@pd.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141007170748.GA25767@jig.fritz.box>

On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 07:07:48PM +0200, Mathias Krause wrote:
> What you can see here are actually the EFI runtime service mappings, not
> the ESP fix area. Check the addresses and compare them. You should find
> similarities ;) And, in fact, the EFI mappings are incomplete in the
> second dump, i.e. the vanilla kernel one, because of the enforced limit
> for the ESP fix area.
> 
> So, in your examples are actually *no* ESP fix area mappings as those
> would be r/o. In fact, I think, the above dumps are the result of a
> CONFIG_EFI_PGT_DUMP enabled kernel that dumps the page table after
> setting up the EFI mappings. There are no ESP fix mappings in this dump
> because those are only set up after the EFI runtime service mappings.

Ok, I think I know what the deal is:

So, the ptdump we do to dmesg very early at boot is the EFI pagetable which
shouldn't have espfix mappings...

> See the following code in init/main:
> 
>   #ifdef CONFIG_X86
>       if (efi_enabled(EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES))
>           efi_enter_virtual_mode();
>   #endif
>   #ifdef CONFIG_X86_ESPFIX64
>       /* Should be run before the first non-init thread is created */
>       init_espfix_bsp();
>   #endif

... exactly because of this: we're setting up the EFI mappings in
the EFI page table before we do the espfix mappings in the *kernel*
pagetable which is a separate one.

So, if we have to be really correct about it, the first dump to dmesg
which comes down the efi_enter_virtual_mode() path shouldn't contain the
espfix area at all.

Later dumps from debugfs cannot select the EFI pagetable so they should
not be dumping the EFI runtime services.

I don't have a good idea about how to do that right now though, maybe
the address markers should have flags or so...

Thanks.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--

  reply	other threads:[~2014-10-08 15:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-09-21 15:26 [PATCHv2 0/3] x86, ptdump: a EFI related fix + enhancements Mathias Krause
2014-09-21 15:26 ` [PATCHv2 1/3] x86, ptdump: Add section for EFI runtime services Mathias Krause
2014-10-03 13:47   ` Matt Fleming
2014-10-07 15:01     ` Borislav Petkov
2014-10-07 17:07       ` Mathias Krause
2014-10-08 15:17         ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2014-10-08 21:58           ` Mathias Krause
2014-10-08 22:26             ` Borislav Petkov
2014-10-12 12:55               ` Mathias Krause
2014-10-28 18:57                 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-10-28 19:48                   ` Mathias Krause
2014-10-28 20:13                     ` Borislav Petkov
2014-10-28 21:14                       ` Mathias Krause
2014-10-28 21:26                         ` Borislav Petkov
2014-10-28 21:49                           ` Mathias Krause
2014-10-28 22:07                             ` Borislav Petkov
2014-10-29  8:06                               ` Mathias Krause
2014-10-29 14:20                         ` Matt Fleming
2014-10-29 15:19                           ` Mathias Krause
2014-10-29 14:22                     ` Matt Fleming
2014-10-29 15:22                       ` Mathias Krause
2014-11-11 21:59                       ` Mathias Krause
2014-11-11 22:32                         ` Matt Fleming
2014-09-21 15:26 ` [PATCHv2 2/3] x86, ptdump: Simplify page flag evaluation code Mathias Krause
2014-09-21 19:49   ` Arjan van de Ven
2014-09-21 20:33     ` Mathias Krause
2014-09-24  7:45       ` Ingo Molnar
2014-09-25 19:27         ` Mathias Krause
2014-09-26  9:25           ` Ingo Molnar
2014-09-26 10:11             ` Borislav Petkov
2014-09-26 11:15               ` Ingo Molnar
2014-09-26 12:35             ` Mathias Krause
2014-09-21 15:26 ` [PATCHv2 3/3] x86, ptdump: Take parent page flags into account Mathias Krause

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20141008151730.GB16892@pd.tnic \
    --to=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matt.fleming@intel.com \
    --cc=matt@console-pimps.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=minipli@googlemail.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®