From: Benoit Parrot <bparrot@ti.com>
To: Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
<linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC Patch] gpio: add GPIO hogging mechanism
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 11:34:45 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141029163445.GB29965@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3D00ADB3-00B3-40A8-8263-444BCADDAC33@gmail.com>
Pantelis,
Thanks for the feedback.
Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@gmail.com> wrote on Wed [2014-Oct-29 10:53:44 +0200]:
> Hi Benoit,
>
> > On Oct 21, 2014, at 23:09 , Benoit Parrot <bparrot@ti.com> wrote:
> >
> > Based on Boris Brezillion work this is a reworked patch
> > of his initial GPIO hogging mechanism.
> > This patch provides a way to initally configure specific GPIO
> > when the gpio controller is probe.
> >
> > The actual DT scanning to collect the GPIO specific data is performed
> > as part of the gpiochip_add().
> >
> > The purpose of this is to allows specific GPIOs to be configured
> > without any driver specific code.
> > This particularly usueful because board design are getting
> > increassingly complex and given SoC pins can now have upward
> > of 10 mux values a lot of connections are now dependent on
> > external IO muxes to switch various modes and combination.
> >
> > Specific drivers should not necessarily need to be aware of
> > what accounts to a specific board implementation. This board level
> > "description" should be best kept as part of the dts file.
> >
>
> This look like it’s going to the right direction. I have a few general
> comments at first.
>
> 1) It relies on dubious DT binding of having sub-nodes of the
> gpio device implicitly defining hogs.
I think in this instance the nodes are explicitly defining hogs.
Please clarify. What would you like to see here?
>
> 2) There is no way for having hogs inserted dynamically as far as I can tell, and
> no way to remove a hog either.
The original patch was allowing that but, Linus's review comment suggested this feature be
part of the gpio-controller's gpiochip_add() hook only.
>
> 3) I’m not very fond of having this being part of the gpio controller. This
> configuration conceptually has little to do with the gpio controller per se,
> it is more of a board specific thing. Why not come up with a gpio-hog driver that
> references GPIOs? That way with a single gpio-hog driver instance you could setup
> all the GPIO-hogging configuration for all GPIOs on the board, even one that
> lie on different GPIO controllers.
Again this follows Linus's review comment.
I agree that it prevent a centralize spot where all hog would be defined but it has the advantages of not relying on PROBE_DEFER.
I mean since all "gpio-hogs" would be defined in a single board dts file it would not be that hard to figure out the big picture anyways.
>
>
> > Signed-off-by: Benoit Parrot <bparrot@ti.com>
> > ---
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio.txt | 33 +++++++++
> > drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c | 99 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 81 ++++++++++++++++++++
> > include/linux/of_gpio.h | 11 +++
> > 4 files changed, 224 insertions(+)
> >
>
> Regards
>
> — Pantelis
>
Regards,
Benoit
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-29 16:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-21 20:09 Benoit Parrot
2014-10-29 7:09 ` Alexandre Courbot
2014-10-29 16:21 ` Benoit Parrot
2014-10-30 0:29 ` Alexandre Courbot
2014-11-14 9:19 ` Linus Walleij
2014-11-14 10:22 ` Maxime Ripard
2014-10-29 8:53 ` Pantelis Antoniou
2014-10-29 16:34 ` Benoit Parrot [this message]
2014-10-29 16:42 ` Pantelis Antoniou
2014-10-29 19:36 ` Benoit Parrot
2014-10-30 0:31 ` Alexandre Courbot
2014-11-03 9:43 ` Linus Walleij
2014-10-29 10:45 ` Maxime Ripard
2014-10-29 16:41 ` Benoit Parrot
2014-10-29 16:47 ` Maxime Ripard
2014-10-29 23:09 ` Benoit Parrot
2014-10-30 17:16 ` Maxime Ripard
2014-11-03 9:59 ` Linus Walleij
2014-11-04 0:38 ` Benoit Parrot
2014-11-14 9:16 ` Linus Walleij
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-10-06 11:58 [GIT PULL] bulk pin control changes for v3.18 Linus Walleij
2014-10-06 15:37 ` [RFC PATCH] gpio: add GPIO hogging mechanism Benoit Parrot
2014-10-21 10:55 ` Linus Walleij
2013-12-19 14:34 Boris BREZILLON
2013-12-19 14:34 ` Boris BREZILLON
2013-12-19 16:41 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-12-19 16:47 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-12-19 17:18 ` boris brezillon
2013-12-19 18:22 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-12-30 9:48 ` boris brezillon
2014-01-08 9:45 ` Linus Walleij
2013-12-19 17:13 ` boris brezillon
2014-09-20 21:37 ` Ben Gamari
2014-09-20 22:26 ` Ben Gamari
2014-01-08 9:37 ` Linus Walleij
2014-01-08 10:18 ` boris brezillon
2014-01-14 10:27 ` Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141029163445.GB29965@ti.com \
--to=bparrot@ti.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pantelis.antoniou@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome