From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: mingo@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: peter@hurleysoftware.com, oleg@redhat.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
eparis@redhat.com, umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com, marcel@holtmann.org,
ebiederm@xmission.com, davem@davemloft.net,
fengguang.wu@intel.com, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/7] wait: Reimplement wait_event_freezable()
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 12:10:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141031111549.551132563@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141031111037.936236584@infradead.org>
[-- Attachment #1: peterz-wait-freezable.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 4763 bytes --]
Provide better implementations of wait_event_freezable() APIs.
The problem is with freezer_do_not_count(), it hides the thread from
the freezer, even though this thread might not actually freeze/sleep
at all.
Cc: oleg@redhat.com
Cc: Rafael Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---
include/linux/freezer.h | 38 --------------------------------
include/linux/wait.h | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
--- a/include/linux/freezer.h
+++ b/include/linux/freezer.h
@@ -265,35 +265,6 @@ static inline int freezable_schedule_hrt
__retval; \
})
-#define wait_event_freezable(wq, condition) \
-({ \
- int __retval; \
- freezer_do_not_count(); \
- __retval = wait_event_interruptible(wq, (condition)); \
- freezer_count(); \
- __retval; \
-})
-
-#define wait_event_freezable_timeout(wq, condition, timeout) \
-({ \
- long __retval = timeout; \
- freezer_do_not_count(); \
- __retval = wait_event_interruptible_timeout(wq, (condition), \
- __retval); \
- freezer_count(); \
- __retval; \
-})
-
-#define wait_event_freezable_exclusive(wq, condition) \
-({ \
- int __retval; \
- freezer_do_not_count(); \
- __retval = wait_event_interruptible_exclusive(wq, condition); \
- freezer_count(); \
- __retval; \
-})
-
-
#else /* !CONFIG_FREEZER */
static inline bool frozen(struct task_struct *p) { return false; }
static inline bool freezing(struct task_struct *p) { return false; }
@@ -331,15 +302,6 @@ static inline void set_freezable(void) {
#define freezable_schedule_hrtimeout_range(expires, delta, mode) \
schedule_hrtimeout_range(expires, delta, mode)
-#define wait_event_freezable(wq, condition) \
- wait_event_interruptible(wq, condition)
-
-#define wait_event_freezable_timeout(wq, condition, timeout) \
- wait_event_interruptible_timeout(wq, condition, timeout)
-
-#define wait_event_freezable_exclusive(wq, condition) \
- wait_event_interruptible_exclusive(wq, condition)
-
#define wait_event_freezekillable(wq, condition) \
wait_event_killable(wq, condition)
--- a/include/linux/wait.h
+++ b/include/linux/wait.h
@@ -267,6 +267,30 @@ do { \
__wait_event(wq, condition); \
} while (0)
+#define __wait_event_freezable(wq, condition) \
+ (void)___wait_event(wq, condition, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, 0, 0, \
+ schedule(); try_to_freeze())
+
+/**
+ * wait_event - sleep (or freeze) until a condition gets true
+ * @wq: the waitqueue to wait on
+ * @condition: a C expression for the event to wait for
+ *
+ * The process is put to sleep (TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE -- so as not to contribute
+ * to system load) until the @condition evaluates to true. The
+ * @condition is checked each time the waitqueue @wq is woken up.
+ *
+ * wake_up() has to be called after changing any variable that could
+ * change the result of the wait condition.
+ */
+#define wait_event_freezable(wq, condition) \
+do { \
+ might_sleep(); \
+ if (condition) \
+ break; \
+ __wait_event_freezable(wq, condition); \
+} while (0)
+
#define __wait_event_timeout(wq, condition, timeout) \
___wait_event(wq, ___wait_cond_timeout(condition), \
TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE, 0, timeout, \
@@ -300,6 +324,24 @@ do { \
__ret; \
})
+#define __wait_event_freezable_timeout(wq, condition, timeout) \
+ ___wait_event(wq, ___wait_cond_timeout(condition), \
+ TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, 0, timeout, \
+ __ret = schedule_timeout(__ret); try_to_freeze())
+
+/*
+ * like wait_event_timeout() -- except it uses TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE to avoid
+ * increasing load and is freezable.
+ */
+#define wait_event_freezable_timeout(wq, condition, timeout) \
+({ \
+ long __ret = timeout; \
+ might_sleep(); \
+ if (!___wait_cond_timeout(condition)) \
+ __ret = __wait_event_freezable_timeout(wq, condition, timeout); \
+ __ret; \
+})
+
#define __wait_event_cmd(wq, condition, cmd1, cmd2) \
(void)___wait_event(wq, condition, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE, 0, 0, \
cmd1; schedule(); cmd2)
@@ -479,6 +521,20 @@ do { \
__ret; \
})
+
+#define __wait_event_freezable_exclusive(wq, condition) \
+ ___wait_event(wq, condition, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, 1, 0, \
+ schedule(); try_to_freeze())
+
+#define wait_event_freezable_exclusive(wq, condition) \
+({ \
+ int __ret = 0; \
+ might_sleep(); \
+ if (!(condition)) \
+ __ret = __wait_event_freezable_exclusive(wq, condition);\
+ __ret; \
+})
+
#define __wait_event_interruptible_locked(wq, condition, exclusive, irq) \
({ \
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-31 11:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-31 11:10 [PATCH 0/7] Various fixes for nested sleep stuff Peter Zijlstra
2014-10-31 11:10 ` [PATCH 1/7] sched,wait: Fix a kthread race with wait_woken() Peter Zijlstra
2014-10-31 22:13 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-10-31 11:10 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2014-10-31 17:41 ` [PATCH 2/7] wait: Reimplement wait_event_freezable() Peter Zijlstra
2014-10-31 21:38 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-10-31 21:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-10-31 21:53 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-10-31 11:10 ` [PATCH 3/7] wait: Remove wait_event_freezekillable() Peter Zijlstra
2014-10-31 11:10 ` [PATCH 4/7] audit,wait: Fixup kauditd_thread wait loop Peter Zijlstra
2014-10-31 11:10 ` [PATCH 5/7] rfcomm: Fix broken wait construct Peter Zijlstra
2014-10-31 11:10 ` [PATCH 6/7] netdev: Fix sleeping inside wait event Peter Zijlstra
2014-10-31 11:10 ` [PATCH 7/7] sched: Use WARN_ONCE for the might_sleep() TASK_RUNNING test Peter Zijlstra
2014-10-31 22:42 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-11-03 7:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141031111549.551132563@infradead.org \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=eparis@redhat.com \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcel@holtmann.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peter@hurleysoftware.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome