From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: mingo@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: peter@hurleysoftware.com, oleg@redhat.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
eparis@redhat.com, umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com, marcel@holtmann.org,
ebiederm@xmission.com, davem@davemloft.net,
fengguang.wu@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] wait: Reimplement wait_event_freezable()
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 18:41:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141031174114.GO10501@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141031111549.551132563@infradead.org>
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 12:10:39PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Provide better implementations of wait_event_freezable() APIs.
>
> The problem is with freezer_do_not_count(), it hides the thread from
> the freezer, even though this thread might not actually freeze/sleep
> at all.
>
> Cc: oleg@redhat.com
> Cc: Rafael Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
> ---
This would maybe compile better.. gotta run, will test later.
--- a/include/linux/wait.h
+++ b/include/linux/wait.h
@@ -284,12 +284,13 @@ do { \
* change the result of the wait condition.
*/
#define wait_event_freezable(wq, condition) \
-do { \
+({ \
+ int __ret = 0; \
might_sleep(); \
- if (condition) \
- break; \
- __wait_event_freezable(wq, condition); \
-} while (0)
+ if (!(condition)) \
+ __ret = __wait_event_freezable(wq, condition); \
+ __ret; \
+})
#define __wait_event_timeout(wq, condition, timeout) \
___wait_event(wq, ___wait_cond_timeout(condition), \
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-31 17:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-31 11:10 [PATCH 0/7] Various fixes for nested sleep stuff Peter Zijlstra
2014-10-31 11:10 ` [PATCH 1/7] sched,wait: Fix a kthread race with wait_woken() Peter Zijlstra
2014-10-31 22:13 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-10-31 11:10 ` [PATCH 2/7] wait: Reimplement wait_event_freezable() Peter Zijlstra
2014-10-31 17:41 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2014-10-31 21:38 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-10-31 21:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-10-31 21:53 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-10-31 11:10 ` [PATCH 3/7] wait: Remove wait_event_freezekillable() Peter Zijlstra
2014-10-31 11:10 ` [PATCH 4/7] audit,wait: Fixup kauditd_thread wait loop Peter Zijlstra
2014-10-31 11:10 ` [PATCH 5/7] rfcomm: Fix broken wait construct Peter Zijlstra
2014-10-31 11:10 ` [PATCH 6/7] netdev: Fix sleeping inside wait event Peter Zijlstra
2014-10-31 11:10 ` [PATCH 7/7] sched: Use WARN_ONCE for the might_sleep() TASK_RUNNING test Peter Zijlstra
2014-10-31 22:42 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-11-03 7:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141031174114.GO10501@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=eparis@redhat.com \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcel@holtmann.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peter@hurleysoftware.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome