From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: "Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Cc: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, nick <xerofoify@gmail.com>,
gleb@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com,
hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Another Obsolete Fix me in trace.h?
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 09:15:43 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141126091543.52dc5bfe@gandalf.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141126124022.GC6795@potion.brq.redhat.com>
On Wed, 26 Nov 2014 13:40:26 +0100
Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com> wrote:
> 2014-11-24 22:49+0100, Radim Krčmář:
> > 2014-11-24 16:19-0500, Steven Rostedt:
> > > That wouldn't be too hard to implement.
> >
> > I'll look at the patch tommorrow.
>
> The kernel part is trivial.
> Most of the code is going to be in tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c.
>
> I wasn't sure whether to
> 1) define new 'enum print_arg_type' for our function and do exactly what
> other __print* did
> 2) extend existing PRINT_FUNC with variable arguments and register it as
> a "global" event handler
>
> as (2) makes more sense to me, but we already had it when some __print*
> was implemented ... (and I didn't want to dig too deep into the project)
Add a new hardcoded instance. The PRINT_FUNC is for plugins that have a
unique function for the events they handle. Notice that event-parse
does not define any func handlers. If this is to be generic, then lets
make it specified as a new enum.
Thanks,
-- Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-26 14:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <5472B5B5.5090201@gmail.com>
2014-11-24 10:12 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-11-24 10:40 ` Jan Kiszka
2014-11-24 21:00 ` Radim Krčmář
2014-11-24 21:19 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-11-24 21:49 ` Radim Krčmář
2014-11-26 12:40 ` Radim Krčmář
2014-11-26 14:15 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2014-11-26 14:49 ` Radim Krčmář
2014-11-26 15:23 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141126091543.52dc5bfe@gandalf.local.home \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=gleb@kernel.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xerofoify@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®