[jbarnes:upstream-sync-points 2/2] drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_sync.c:43:12: sparse: symbol 'fence_lock' was not declared. Should it be static?

[jbarnes:upstream-sync-points 2/2] drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_sync.c:43:12: sparse: symbol 'fence_lock' was not declared. Should it be static?

[kbuild test robot]

tree:   git://people.freedesktop.org/~jbarnes/linux upstream-sync-points
head:   97b242f63adaf11c3edf16b0282243cc4274eac8
commit: 97b242f63adaf11c3edf16b0282243cc4274eac8 [2/2] drm/i915: Android sync points for i915 v3
reproduce:
  # apt-get install sparse
  git checkout 97b242f63adaf11c3edf16b0282243cc4274eac8
  make ARCH=x86_64 allmodconfig
  make C=1 CF=-D__CHECK_ENDIAN__


sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)

>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_sync.c:43:12: sparse: symbol 'fence_lock' was not declared. Should it be static?

Please review and possibly fold the followup patch.

---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure                Open Source Technology Center
http://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/kbuild                 Intel Corporation

[PATCH jbarnes] drm/i915: fence_lock can be static

[kbuild test robot]

drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_sync.c:43:12: sparse: symbol 'fence_lock' was not declared. Should it be static?

Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
---
 i915_sync.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_sync.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_sync.c
index 069c069..b614eea 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_sync.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_sync.c
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@
 #include "../../../staging/android/sync.h"
 
 /* Nothing really to protect here... */
-spinlock_t fence_lock;
+static spinlock_t fence_lock;
 
 /*
  * i915 fences on sync timelines