From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
x86@kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] dma: add dma_get_required_mask_from_max_pfn()
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 10:32:26 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141209153226.GA29841@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54857F1E.1010506@citrix.com>
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 10:36:14AM +0000, David Vrabel wrote:
> On 05/12/14 21:31, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 02:08:00PM +0000, David Vrabel wrote:
> >> A generic dma_get_required_mask() is useful even for architectures (such
> >> as ia64) that define ARCH_HAS_GET_REQUIRED_MASK.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
> >> Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/base/platform.c | 10 ++++++++--
> >
> > Is this why you sent this to me? The x86 maintainers should handle this
> > patch set, not me for a tiny 8 lines in just one of the files, sorry.
>
> This series will be merged via the Xen tree, but this patch still needs
> your review or ack.
How about waiting until after the merge window and resending it, asking
for that, instead of making me guess :)
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-09 15:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-05 14:07 [PATCHv5 0/4] dma, x86, xen: reduce SWIOTLB usage in Xen guests David Vrabel
2014-12-05 14:08 ` [PATCH 1/4] dma: add dma_get_required_mask_from_max_pfn() David Vrabel
2014-12-05 21:31 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2014-12-08 10:36 ` David Vrabel
2014-12-09 15:32 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2014-12-05 14:08 ` [PATCH 2/4] ia64: use common dma_get_required_mask_from_pfn() David Vrabel
2014-12-05 14:08 ` [PATCH 3/4] x86: allow dma_get_required_mask() to be overridden David Vrabel
2014-12-05 14:08 ` [PATCH 4/4] x86/xen: assume a 64-bit DMA mask is required David Vrabel
2014-12-05 21:29 ` [PATCHv5 0/4] dma, x86, xen: reduce SWIOTLB usage in Xen guests Greg Kroah-Hartman
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-11-20 11:50 [PATCHv4 0/4]: " David Vrabel
2014-11-20 11:50 ` [PATCH 1/4] dma: add dma_get_required_mask_from_max_pfn() David Vrabel
2014-11-19 16:01 [PATCHv3 0/4]: dma, x86, xen: reduce SWIOTLB usage in Xen guests David Vrabel
2014-11-19 16:01 ` [PATCH 1/4] dma: add dma_get_required_mask_from_max_pfn() David Vrabel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141209153226.GA29841@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome