From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
<x86@kernel.org>, <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] dma: add dma_get_required_mask_from_max_pfn()
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 10:36:14 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54857F1E.1010506@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141205213113.GB3012@kroah.com>
On 05/12/14 21:31, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 02:08:00PM +0000, David Vrabel wrote:
>> A generic dma_get_required_mask() is useful even for architectures (such
>> as ia64) that define ARCH_HAS_GET_REQUIRED_MASK.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/base/platform.c | 10 ++++++++--
>
> Is this why you sent this to me? The x86 maintainers should handle this
> patch set, not me for a tiny 8 lines in just one of the files, sorry.
This series will be merged via the Xen tree, but this patch still needs
your review or ack.
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-08 10:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-05 14:07 [PATCHv5 0/4] dma, x86, xen: reduce SWIOTLB usage in Xen guests David Vrabel
2014-12-05 14:08 ` [PATCH 1/4] dma: add dma_get_required_mask_from_max_pfn() David Vrabel
2014-12-05 21:31 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2014-12-08 10:36 ` David Vrabel [this message]
2014-12-09 15:32 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2014-12-05 14:08 ` [PATCH 2/4] ia64: use common dma_get_required_mask_from_pfn() David Vrabel
2014-12-05 14:08 ` [PATCH 3/4] x86: allow dma_get_required_mask() to be overridden David Vrabel
2014-12-05 14:08 ` [PATCH 4/4] x86/xen: assume a 64-bit DMA mask is required David Vrabel
2014-12-05 21:29 ` [PATCHv5 0/4] dma, x86, xen: reduce SWIOTLB usage in Xen guests Greg Kroah-Hartman
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-11-20 11:50 [PATCHv4 0/4]: " David Vrabel
2014-11-20 11:50 ` [PATCH 1/4] dma: add dma_get_required_mask_from_max_pfn() David Vrabel
2014-11-19 16:01 [PATCHv3 0/4]: dma, x86, xen: reduce SWIOTLB usage in Xen guests David Vrabel
2014-11-19 16:01 ` [PATCH 1/4] dma: add dma_get_required_mask_from_max_pfn() David Vrabel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54857F1E.1010506@citrix.com \
--to=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome