From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>
Cc: Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Subject: Re: Linux 3.19-rc3
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2015 10:59:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150106095930.GK29390@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+icZUXbbLE-z0SS=0rVnEYq5zFr1f4omOuSS7BL4OpAv0eagA@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 10:34:30AM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> I tried to do such a "similiar" (quick) fix analog to the mentioned
> "sched, inotify: Deal with nested sleeps" patch from Peter.
> If I did correct... It does not make the call-trace go away here.
Are you very sure its the same splat and not another? I don't appear to
have anything triggering this on my test boxes (which are very much not
infected with system-disease).
The patch does look about right.
> ---
> fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c | 9 +++++----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c b/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c
> index c991616..65e96e2 100644
> --- a/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c
> +++ b/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c
> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
> #include <linux/types.h>
> #include <linux/uaccess.h>
> #include <linux/compat.h>
> +#include <linux/wait.h>
>
> #include <asm/ioctls.h>
>
> @@ -259,15 +260,15 @@ static ssize_t fanotify_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf,
> struct fsnotify_event *kevent;
> char __user *start;
> int ret;
> - DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
> + DEFINE_WAIT_FUNC(wait, woken_wake_function);
>
> start = buf;
> group = file->private_data;
>
> pr_debug("%s: group=%p\n", __func__, group);
>
> + add_wait_queue(&group->notification_waitq, &wait);
> while (1) {
> - prepare_to_wait(&group->notification_waitq, &wait, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
>
> mutex_lock(&group->notification_mutex);
> kevent = get_one_event(group, count);
> @@ -289,7 +290,7 @@ static ssize_t fanotify_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf,
>
> if (start != buf)
> break;
> - schedule();
> + wait_woken(&wait, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT);
> continue;
> }
>
> @@ -318,8 +319,8 @@ static ssize_t fanotify_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf,
> buf += ret;
> count -= ret;
> }
> + remove_wait_queue(&group->notification_waitq, &wait);
>
> - finish_wait(&group->notification_waitq, &wait);
> if (start != buf && ret != -EFAULT)
> ret = buf - start;
> return ret;
> --
> 2.2.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-06 9:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 101+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-06 4:49 Sedat Dilek
2015-01-06 9:34 ` Sedat Dilek
2015-01-06 9:56 ` Takashi Iwai
2015-01-06 10:06 ` Sedat Dilek
2015-01-06 10:28 ` Takashi Iwai
2015-01-06 10:31 ` Sedat Dilek
2015-01-06 10:37 ` Takashi Iwai
2015-01-06 10:42 ` Sedat Dilek
2015-01-06 9:59 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2015-01-06 9:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-01-06 9:42 ` Sedat Dilek
2015-01-06 9:57 ` Sedat Dilek
2015-01-06 10:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-01-06 10:18 ` Sedat Dilek
2015-01-06 11:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-01-06 11:07 ` Kent Overstreet
2015-01-06 11:25 ` Sedat Dilek
2015-01-06 11:40 ` Kent Overstreet
2015-01-06 12:51 ` Sedat Dilek
2015-01-06 11:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-01-06 11:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-01-06 12:01 ` Kent Overstreet
2015-01-06 12:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-01-06 12:45 ` Kent Overstreet
2015-01-06 12:55 ` Peter Hurley
2015-01-06 17:38 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-01-06 17:58 ` Peter Hurley
2015-01-06 19:25 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-01-06 19:57 ` Peter Hurley
2015-01-06 20:47 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-01-20 0:30 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-01-20 14:03 ` Peter Hurley
2015-02-02 16:11 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-02-02 19:03 ` Peter Hurley
2015-02-02 19:33 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-01-06 11:56 ` Kent Overstreet
2015-01-06 12:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-01-06 12:43 ` Kent Overstreet
2015-01-06 13:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-01-06 13:28 ` Kent Overstreet
2015-01-13 15:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-01-06 11:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-01-06 12:18 ` Kent Overstreet
2015-01-16 16:56 ` Peter Hurley
2015-01-16 17:00 ` Chris Mason
2015-01-16 18:58 ` Peter Hurley
2015-01-06 10:29 ` Sedat Dilek
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-01-06 1:46 Linus Torvalds
2015-01-06 2:46 ` Dave Jones
2015-01-06 8:18 ` Takashi Iwai
2015-01-06 9:45 ` Jiri Kosina
2015-01-08 12:51 ` Mark Langsdorf
2015-01-08 13:45 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-01-08 17:29 ` Mark Langsdorf
2015-01-08 17:34 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-01-08 18:48 ` Mark Langsdorf
2015-01-08 19:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-01-09 23:27 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-01-10 0:35 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2015-01-10 2:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-01-10 2:51 ` David Lang
2015-01-10 3:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-01-10 10:46 ` Andreas Mohr
2015-01-10 19:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-01-13 3:33 ` Rik van Riel
2015-01-13 10:28 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-01-10 3:17 ` Tony Luck
2015-01-10 20:16 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-01-10 21:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-01-10 21:36 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-01-10 21:48 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-01-12 11:37 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2015-01-12 12:18 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-01-12 13:57 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-01-12 14:23 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-01-12 15:42 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-01-12 11:53 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-01-12 13:15 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-01-08 15:08 ` Michal Hocko
2015-01-08 16:37 ` Mark Langsdorf
2015-01-09 15:56 ` Michal Hocko
2015-01-09 12:13 ` Mark Rutland
2015-01-09 14:19 ` Steve Capper
2015-01-09 14:27 ` Mark Langsdorf
2015-01-09 17:57 ` Mark Rutland
2015-01-09 18:37 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-01-09 19:43 ` Will Deacon
2015-01-10 3:29 ` Laszlo Ersek
2015-01-10 4:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-01-10 13:37 ` Will Deacon
2015-01-10 19:47 ` Laszlo Ersek
2015-01-10 19:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-01-10 20:08 ` Laszlo Ersek
2015-01-10 19:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-01-12 12:42 ` Will Deacon
2015-01-12 13:22 ` Mark Langsdorf
2015-01-12 19:03 ` Dave Hansen
2015-01-12 19:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-01-12 19:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-01-12 19:24 ` Will Deacon
2015-01-10 15:22 ` Kyle McMartin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150106095930.GK29390@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=davej@codemonkey.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sedat.dilek@gmail.com \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome