From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] perf probe: Do not rely on map__load() filter to find symbols
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 10:54:17 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150114135417.GC3691@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1421234288-22758-3-git-send-email-namhyung@kernel.org>
Em Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 08:18:07PM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
> The find_probe_trace_events_from_map() searches matching symbol from a
> map (so from a backing dso). For uprobes, it'll create a new map (and
> dso) and loads it using a filter. It's a little bit inefficient in that
> it'll read out the symbol table everytime but works well anyway.
>
> For kprobes however, it'll reuse existing kernel map which might be
> loaded before. In this case map__load() just returns with no result.
> It makes kprobes always failed to find symbol even if it exists in the
> map (dso).
>
> To fix it, use map__find_symbol_by_name() instead. It'll load a map
> with full symbols and sorts them by name. It needs to search sibing
> nodes since there can be multiple (local) symbols with same name.
>
> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
> ---
> tools/perf/util/probe-event.c | 32 +++++++++++++++-----------------
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/probe-event.c b/tools/perf/util/probe-event.c
> index 94a717bf007d..b1406d79b271 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/probe-event.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/probe-event.c
> @@ -2193,18 +2193,18 @@ static int __add_probe_trace_events(struct perf_probe_event *pev,
> return ret;
> }
>
> -static char *looking_function_name;
> -static int num_matched_functions;
> -
> -static int probe_function_filter(struct map *map __maybe_unused,
> - struct symbol *sym)
> +static int find_probe_functions(struct map *map, char *name)
> {
> - if ((sym->binding == STB_GLOBAL || sym->binding == STB_LOCAL) &&
> - strcmp(looking_function_name, sym->name) == 0) {
> - num_matched_functions++;
> - return 0;
> + struct symbol *sym, *link = NULL;
> + int found = 0;
> +
> + while ((sym = map__find_symbol_by_name(map, name, NULL, link)) != NULL) {
> + if (sym->binding == STB_GLOBAL || sym->binding == STB_LOCAL)
> + found++;
> + link = sym;
> }
> - return 1;
> +
> + return found;
> }
How about using the "from" (that you called "link") to follow the list.h
style and provide:
map__find_symbol_by_name_from(map, sym, filter, from);
And use it to implement map__find_symbol_by_name():
map__find_symbol_by_name(map, sym, filter)
{
return map__find_symbol_by_name_from(map, sym, filter, NULL);
}
Your loop would then become:
link = NULL;
while ((sym = map__find_symbol_by_name_from(map, name, NULL, link)) != NULL) {
if (sym->binding == STB_GLOBAL || sym->binding == STB_LOCAL)
found++;
link = sym;
}
And no map__find_symbol_by_name() callsites would have to be touched.
- Arnaldo
> #define strdup_or_goto(str, label) \
> @@ -2221,11 +2221,11 @@ static int find_probe_trace_events_from_map(struct perf_probe_event *pev,
> struct map *map = NULL;
> struct kmap *kmap = NULL;
> struct ref_reloc_sym *reloc_sym = NULL;
> - struct symbol *sym;
> - struct rb_node *nd;
> + struct symbol *sym, *link = NULL;
> struct probe_trace_event *tev;
> struct perf_probe_point *pp = &pev->point;
> struct probe_trace_point *tp;
> + int num_matched_functions;
> int ret, i;
>
> /* Init maps of given executable or kernel */
> @@ -2242,10 +2242,8 @@ static int find_probe_trace_events_from_map(struct perf_probe_event *pev,
> * Load matched symbols: Since the different local symbols may have
> * same name but different addresses, this lists all the symbols.
> */
> - num_matched_functions = 0;
> - looking_function_name = pp->function;
> - ret = map__load(map, probe_function_filter);
> - if (ret || num_matched_functions == 0) {
> + num_matched_functions = find_probe_functions(map, pp->function);
> + if (num_matched_functions == 0) {
> pr_err("Failed to find symbol %s in %s\n", pp->function,
> target ? : "kernel");
> ret = -ENOENT;
> @@ -2275,7 +2273,7 @@ static int find_probe_trace_events_from_map(struct perf_probe_event *pev,
> }
>
> ret = 0;
> - map__for_each_symbol(map, sym, nd) {
> + while ((sym = map__find_symbol_by_name(map, pp->function, NULL, link))) {
> tev = (*tevs) + ret;
> tp = &tev->point;
> if (ret == num_matched_functions) {
> --
> 2.2.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-14 13:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-14 11:18 [PATCH v2 1/4] perf tools: Fix segfault for symbol annotation on TUI Namhyung Kim
2015-01-14 11:18 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] perf tools: Add link argument to dso__find_symbol_by_name() Namhyung Kim
2015-01-14 16:36 ` David Ahern
2015-01-15 0:23 ` Namhyung Kim
2015-01-15 0:42 ` David Ahern
2015-01-28 15:01 ` [tip:perf/core] perf symbols: Return the first entry with a given name in find_by_name method tip-bot for Namhyung Kim
2015-01-14 11:18 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] perf probe: Do not rely on map__load() filter to find symbols Namhyung Kim
2015-01-14 13:54 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2015-01-15 12:09 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2015-01-28 15:02 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Namhyung Kim
2015-01-14 11:18 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] perf probe: Fix probing kretprobes Namhyung Kim
2015-01-14 16:26 ` Jiri Olsa
2015-01-15 12:11 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2015-01-28 15:02 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Namhyung Kim
2015-01-14 12:57 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] perf tools: Fix segfault for symbol annotation on TUI Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-01-14 14:57 ` David Ahern
2015-01-14 21:08 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-01-15 0:20 ` Namhyung Kim
2015-01-17 12:38 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-01-17 10:13 ` [tip:perf/urgent] " tip-bot for Namhyung Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150114135417.GC3691@kernel.org \
--to=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome