mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gilad Avidov <gavidov@codeaurora.org>
To: Stanimir Varbanov <svarbanov@mm-sol.com>
Cc: sdharia@codeaurora.org, mlocke@codeaurora.org,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iivanov@mm-sol.com,
	galak@codeaurora.org, agross@codeaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] spmi: remove wakeup command before slave probe
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2015 18:17:21 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150203181721.6bf24e59@gavidov-lnx.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54D096B8.4060408@mm-sol.com>

Hi Stan,

On Tue, 03 Feb 2015 11:36:56 +0200
Stanimir Varbanov <svarbanov@mm-sol.com> wrote:

> On 01/31/2015 02:46 AM, Gilad Avidov wrote:
> > According to spmi spec a slave powers up into startup state and then
> > transitions into active state. Thus, the wakeup command is not
> > required before calling the slave's probe. The wakeup command is
> > only needed for slaves that are in sleep state after receiving the
> > sleep command.
> > 
> > This is a bug since spmi master controllers, such as spmi-pmic-arb,
> > which have no support for wakeup command return an error on that
> > command and thus fail before reaching a slave driver probe.
> > 
> > Cc: galak@codeaurora.org
> > Acked-by: Sagar Dharia <sdharia@codeaurora.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Gilad Avidov <gavidov@codeaurora.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/spmi/spmi.c | 8 +-------
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/spmi/spmi.c b/drivers/spmi/spmi.c
> > index 1d92f51..9ff7454 100644
> > --- a/drivers/spmi/spmi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/spmi/spmi.c
> > @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> > -/* Copyright (c) 2012-2013, The Linux Foundation. All rights
> > reserved. +/* Copyright (c) 2012-2015, The Linux Foundation. All
> > rights reserved.
> 
> run chackpatch please.

I have run checkpatch again on both my patch and the email sent by
me and both pass on my machine:

~/upstream/linux$ scripts/checkpatch.pl "[PATCH V2
1_2] spmi: remove wakeup command before slave probe" total: 0 errors, 0
warnings, 23 lines checked

[PATCH V2 1_2] spmi: remove wakeup command before slave probe has no
obvious style problems and is ready for submission.


I have also updated the source tree today, so it checkpatch's latest
version. Additionally my colleague have tested on her machine and it
passes for here too.

Thanks,
Gilad

> 
> <snip>
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2015-02-04  1:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-31  0:46 [PATCH V2 0/2] add support for pmic_arb v2 and correct framework Gilad Avidov
2015-01-31  0:46 ` [PATCH V2 1/2] spmi: remove wakeup command before slave probe Gilad Avidov
2015-02-03  9:36   ` Stanimir Varbanov
2015-02-04  1:17     ` Gilad Avidov [this message]
2015-01-31  0:46 ` [PATCH V2 2/2] spmi: pmic_arb: add support for hw version 2 Gilad Avidov
2015-02-03  9:59   ` Stanimir Varbanov
2015-02-03 16:59     ` Gilad Avidov
2015-02-03 17:14       ` Stanimir Varbanov
2015-02-03 21:21     ` Lina Iyer
2015-02-04 14:36       ` Stanimir Varbanov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150203181721.6bf24e59@gavidov-lnx.qualcomm.com \
    --to=gavidov@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=agross@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=galak@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=iivanov@mm-sol.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mlocke@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=sdharia@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=svarbanov@mm-sol.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®