From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
To: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Dongsu Park <dongsu.park@profitbricks.com>,
dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] dm: fix multipath regression due to initializing wrong request
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 12:35:15 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150209173514.GA14199@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150209171311.GC1599@redhat.com>
On Mon, Feb 09 2015 at 12:13P -0500,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 09 2015 at 12:07pm -0500,
> Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com> wrote:
>
> > Oh, we're not going rebase the series with the correction? I'm concerned
> > someone biscecting a completely unrelated problem might step on this
> > commit. Up to you guys. It's my fault, so I'll deal with the consequences.
>
> Rebasing this late (3.20 merge already opened) is generally not done.
> Unfortunately we'll just have to suck it up and deal with the fallout
> during bisect -- would wager very few are bisecting with multipath as
> the focus of their test.
Jens and I discussed this further and given that linux-block breaks
dm-multipath it is best to fix linux-block and let Linus resolve the
merge when I send him the linux-dm pull.
Here is the patch to fix the regression:
From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 12:21:54 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] dm: fix multipath regression due to initializing wrong request
Commit febf715 ("block: require blk_rq_prep_clone() be given an
initialized clone request") introduced a regression by calling
blk_rq_init() on the original request rather than the clone
request that is passed to setup_clone().
Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
---
drivers/md/dm.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/md/dm.c b/drivers/md/dm.c
index f251633..71e6b73 100644
--- a/drivers/md/dm.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm.c
@@ -1719,7 +1719,7 @@ static int setup_clone(struct request *clone, struct request *rq,
{
int r;
- blk_rq_init(NULL, rq);
+ blk_rq_init(NULL, clone);
r = blk_rq_prep_clone(clone, rq, tio->md->bs, GFP_ATOMIC,
dm_rq_bio_constructor, tio);
if (r)
--
1.9.3 (Apple Git-50)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-09 17:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-09 16:38 blk-mq crash with dm-multipath in for-3.20/core Dongsu Park
2015-02-09 16:48 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-02-09 17:07 ` Keith Busch
2015-02-09 17:13 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-02-09 17:35 ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
2015-02-09 17:47 ` [PATCH] dm: fix multipath regression due to initializing wrong request Jens Axboe
2015-02-10 10:42 ` Dongsu Park
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150209173514.GA14199@redhat.com \
--to=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=dongsu.park@profitbricks.com \
--cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®