From: Jiri Bohac <jbohac@suse.cz>
To: Jiri Bohac <jbohac@suse.cz>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>,
Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] time, ntp: Do not update time_state in middle of leap second [v3]
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 18:38:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150218173852.GB31353@midget.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150218171404.GA31353@midget.suse.cz>
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 06:14:04PM +0100, Jiri Bohac wrote:
> I think the only real problem occurs when the adjtimex is called in the
> the TIME_OOP state
... or the TIME_WAIT state ...
> with STA_PLL cleared _and_ STA_INS set.
> In this case the state machine is reset to TIME_OK but goes back
> to TIME_INS on the next second_overflow, potentially causing
> another false leap second to be inserted on the following
> midnight.
>
> The state machine is meant to only go back to TIME_INS once STA_INS is
> cleared and then set again - this is what the TIME_WAIT state is
> for.
>
> In fact, I don't see a reason why the STA_PLL -> !STA_PLL transition should
> ever set the time_state to TIME_OK.
> - When the STA_INS/STA_DEL flag is removed from the status, the state
> machine will end up in TIME_OK from any state.
> - When STA_INS/STA_DEL is set in
> the status, the state mchine will transition from TIME_OK to
> TIME_INS/TIME_DEL anyway.
>
> I think the "time_status = TIME_OK" should be just dropped.
>
> It has been added by eea83d896e318bda54be2d2770d2c5d6668d11db
> (ntp: NTP4 user space bits update) and it's not clear why.
> Roman?
--
Jiri Bohac <jbohac@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, SUSE CZ
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-18 17:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-12 13:58 Prarit Bhargava
2015-02-17 23:16 ` John Stultz
2015-02-18 17:14 ` Jiri Bohac
2015-02-18 17:38 ` Jiri Bohac [this message]
2015-02-20 14:12 ` Prarit Bhargava
2015-02-19 17:00 ` Jiri Bohac
2015-02-20 14:15 ` Prarit Bhargava
2015-02-20 17:19 ` Jiri Bohac
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150218173852.GB31353@midget.suse.cz \
--to=jbohac@suse.cz \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mlichvar@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=prarit@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=zippel@linux-m68k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®