From: Jiri Bohac <jbohac@suse.cz>
To: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] time, ntp: Do not update time_state in middle of leap second [v3]
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 18:00:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150219170048.GB25948@midget.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1423749499-18520-1-git-send-email-prarit@redhat.com>
Hi,
I'm trying to understand what exactly is going on here...
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 08:58:19AM -0500, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> The test did the following in userspace:
>
> tx.modes = ADJ_STATUS;
> tx.status = STA_INS;
>
> /* send leap second request */
> ret = adjtimex(&tx);
>
> /* Check adjtimex output every half second */
> now = tx.time.tv_sec;
> while (now < next_leap+2) {
> char buf[26];
> ret = adjtimex(&tx);
>
> ctime_r(&tx.time.tv_sec, buf);
> buf[strlen(buf)-1] = 0; /*remove trailing\n */
>
> printf("%s + %6ld us\t%s\n",
> buf,
> tx.time.tv_usec,
> time_state_str(ret));
> now = tx.time.tv_sec;
> /* Sleep for another half second */
> ts.tv_sec = 0;
> ts.tv_nsec = NSEC_PER_SEC/2;
> clock_nanosleep(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, 0, &ts, NULL);
> }
>
> After some investigation it was noted that the test contained a small error:
> the test does not reinitialize tx.status and reissues the STA_INS every
> 1/2 second.
Prarit, can you explain who sets the STA_PLL flag, so that
process_adj_status() detects a STA_PLL->!STA_PLL transition and
goes to the branch that sets time_state = TIME_OK?
Is that ntpd running in parallel with your test program? If that
is the case, you would eventually end up oscilating between the
the TIME_INS and TIME_OK states anyway, even with your patch.
ntpd will clear the STA_INS flag after midnight, the state
machine will transition from TIME_WAIT to TIME_OK and your test
program will set STA_INS again (fighting with ntpd which will
clear the flag from time to time) ... right?
Thanks,
--
Jiri Bohac <jbohac@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, SUSE CZ
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-19 17:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-12 13:58 Prarit Bhargava
2015-02-17 23:16 ` John Stultz
2015-02-18 17:14 ` Jiri Bohac
2015-02-18 17:38 ` Jiri Bohac
2015-02-20 14:12 ` Prarit Bhargava
2015-02-19 17:00 ` Jiri Bohac [this message]
2015-02-20 14:15 ` Prarit Bhargava
2015-02-20 17:19 ` Jiri Bohac
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150219170048.GB25948@midget.suse.cz \
--to=jbohac@suse.cz \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mlichvar@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=prarit@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®