mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [jtkirshe-net-next:community 284/296] net/mpls/af_mpls.c:215:25: sparse: symbol 'rtm_mpls_policy' was not declared. Should it be static?
@ 2015-03-04 21:33 kbuild test robot
  2015-03-04 21:33 ` [PATCH jtkirshe-net-next] mpls: rtm_mpls_policy[] can be static kbuild test robot
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: kbuild test robot @ 2015-03-04 21:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Eric W. Biederman; +Cc: kbuild-all, netdev, linux-kernel

tree:   jtkirshe-net-next/community
head:   2d7208e1fa7f4f7667632746c0e1b6fa3640e0b3
commit: 03c0566542f4c7a45ce3193f27cbf5700b506c18 [284/296] mpls: Netlink commands to add, remove, and dump routes
reproduce:
  # apt-get install sparse
  git checkout 03c0566542f4c7a45ce3193f27cbf5700b506c18
  make ARCH=x86_64 allmodconfig
  make C=1 CF=-D__CHECK_ENDIAN__


sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)

>> net/mpls/af_mpls.c:215:25: sparse: symbol 'rtm_mpls_policy' was not declared. Should it be static?
   net/mpls/af_mpls.c:237:22: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different base types)
   net/mpls/af_mpls.c:237:22:    expected unsigned long [unsigned] [usertype] size
   net/mpls/af_mpls.c:237:22:    got restricted gfp_t
   net/mpls/af_mpls.c:237:46: sparse: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base types)
   net/mpls/af_mpls.c:237:46:    expected restricted gfp_t [usertype] flags
   net/mpls/af_mpls.c:237:46:    got unsigned long
   net/mpls/af_mpls.c:257:12: sparse: incorrect type in assignment (different address spaces)
   net/mpls/af_mpls.c:257:12:    expected struct mpls_route *rt
   net/mpls/af_mpls.c:257:12:    got struct mpls_route [noderef] <asn:4>*[noderef] <asn:4><noident>
   net/mpls/af_mpls.c:259:17: sparse: cast removes address space of expression
   net/mpls/af_mpls.c:327:13: sparse: incorrect type in assignment (different address spaces)
   net/mpls/af_mpls.c:327:13:    expected struct mpls_route *old
   net/mpls/af_mpls.c:327:13:    got struct mpls_route [noderef] <asn:4>*[noderef] <asn:4><noident>
   net/mpls/af_mpls.c:392:65: sparse: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces)
   net/mpls/af_mpls.c:392:65:    expected struct mpls_route *rt
   net/mpls/af_mpls.c:392:65:    got struct mpls_route [noderef] <asn:4>*[noderef] <asn:4><noident>
   net/mpls/af_mpls.c:681:20: sparse: incorrect type in assignment (different address spaces)
   net/mpls/af_mpls.c:681:20:    expected struct mpls_route *rt
   net/mpls/af_mpls.c:681:20:    got struct mpls_route [noderef] <asn:4>*[noderef] <asn:4><noident>
   net/mpls/af_mpls.c:737:13: sparse: incorrect type in assignment (different address spaces)
   net/mpls/af_mpls.c:737:13:    expected struct mpls_route [noderef] <asn:4>**old
   net/mpls/af_mpls.c:737:13:    got struct mpls_route [noderef] <asn:4>*[noderef] <asn:4>*platform_label
   net/mpls/af_mpls.c:754:50: sparse: incorrect type in assignment (different address spaces)
   net/mpls/af_mpls.c:754:50:    expected struct mpls_route [noderef] <asn:4>*<noident>
   net/mpls/af_mpls.c:754:50:    got struct mpls_route *[assigned] rt2
   net/mpls/af_mpls.c:760:50: sparse: incorrect type in assignment (different address spaces)
   net/mpls/af_mpls.c:760:50:    expected struct mpls_route [noderef] <asn:4>*<noident>
   net/mpls/af_mpls.c:760:50:    got struct mpls_route *[assigned] rt0
   net/mpls/af_mpls.c:766:34: sparse: incorrect type in assignment (different address spaces)
   net/mpls/af_mpls.c:766:34:    expected struct mpls_route [noderef] <asn:4>*[noderef] <asn:4>*platform_label
   net/mpls/af_mpls.c:766:34:    got struct mpls_route [noderef] <asn:4>**[assigned] labels
   net/mpls/af_mpls.c:860:65: sparse: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces)
   net/mpls/af_mpls.c:860:65:    expected struct mpls_route *rt
   net/mpls/af_mpls.c:860:65:    got struct mpls_route [noderef] <asn:4>*[noderef] <asn:4><noident>
   net/mpls/af_mpls.c:861:17: sparse: cast removes address space of expression
   net/mpls/af_mpls.c:866:25: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces)
   net/mpls/af_mpls.c:866:25:    expected void const *addr
   net/mpls/af_mpls.c:866:25:    got struct mpls_route [noderef] <asn:4>*[noderef] <asn:4>*platform_label
   net/mpls/af_mpls.c:271:46: sparse: dereference of noderef expression
   net/mpls/af_mpls.c:392:65: sparse: dereference of noderef expression
   net/mpls/af_mpls.c:860:65: sparse: dereference of noderef expression

Please review and possibly fold the followup patch.

---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure                Open Source Technology Center
http://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/kbuild                 Intel Corporation

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2015-03-04 21:40 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-03-04 21:33 [jtkirshe-net-next:community 284/296] net/mpls/af_mpls.c:215:25: sparse: symbol 'rtm_mpls_policy' was not declared. Should it be static? kbuild test robot
2015-03-04 21:33 ` [PATCH jtkirshe-net-next] mpls: rtm_mpls_policy[] can be static kbuild test robot
2015-03-04 21:40   ` David Miller

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®