Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] i8k.c => dell-smm-hwmon.c

[Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>]

On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 03:52:06PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 06:40:57AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On 04/21/2015 06:30 AM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > >On Thursday 09 April 2015 16:02:24 Pali Rohár wrote:
> > >>On Tuesday 31 March 2015 15:56:01 Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > >>>On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 08:32:36PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > >>>>On 03/29/2015 05:57 AM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > >>>>>This patch series moves drivers/char/i8k.c to drivers/hwmon/dell-smm-hwmon.c
> > >>>>>and allows to compile hwmon driver without /proc/i8k file.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>Pali Rohár (2):
> > >>>>>   hwmon: Rename i8k driver to dell-smm-hwmon and move it to hwmon tree
> > >>>>>   hwmon: Allow to compile dell-smm-hwmon driver without /proc/i8k
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>  MAINTAINERS                    |    4 +-
> > >>>>>  arch/x86/Kconfig               |   25 +-
> > >>>>>  drivers/char/Makefile          |    1 -
> > >>>>>  drivers/char/i8k.c             | 1005 ---------------------------------------
> > >>>>>  drivers/hwmon/Kconfig          |   11 +
> > >>>>>  drivers/hwmon/Makefile         |    1 +
> > >>>>>  drivers/hwmon/dell-smm-hwmon.c | 1025 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >>>>>  7 files changed, 1049 insertions(+), 1023 deletions(-)
> > >>>>>  delete mode 100644 drivers/char/i8k.c
> > >>>>>  create mode 100644 drivers/hwmon/dell-smm-hwmon.c
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>I am ok with the series and would take it for 4.1 if Greg agrees.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>Greg, any comments ?
> > >>>
> > >>>Let me review it, it's in my queue...
> > >>
> > >>Hi Greg! Have you looked at it?
> > >>
> > >
> > >Greg & Guenter: ping. Will you include it into 4.1?
> > >
> > I don't see it in Greg's pull request, so presumably no (unless I missed it).
> 
> No, I missed it for this rc cycle, sorry.  If you want to include it in
> yours, by all means please do so.
> 
Too late; I sent my pull request early last week. Also, since I don't have
the patch in my queue, it would not follow my own process, and I really
dislike doing that.

Guenter