From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>,
Anton Arapov <arapov@gmail.com>,
David Long <dave.long@linaro.org>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>,
"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Jan Willeke <willeke@de.ibm.com>,
Jim Keniston <jkenisto@us.ibm.com>,
Mark Wielaard <mjw@redhat.com>,
Pratyush Anand <panand@redhat.com>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 03/10] uprobes: Send SIGILL if handle_trampoline() fails
Date: Mon, 4 May 2015 14:48:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150504124858.GA22488@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150504124835.GA22462@redhat.com>
1. It doesn't make sense to continue if handle_trampoline() fails,
change handle_swbp() to always return after this call.
2. Turn pr_warn() into uprobe_warn(), and change handle_trampoline()
to send SIGILL on failure. It is pointless to return to user mode
with the corrupted instruction_pointer() which we can't restore.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
---
kernel/events/uprobes.c | 21 ++++++++++-----------
1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/events/uprobes.c b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
index d8c702f..f84d940 100644
--- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c
+++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
@@ -1770,7 +1770,7 @@ handle_uretprobe_chain(struct return_instance *ri, struct pt_regs *regs)
up_read(&uprobe->register_rwsem);
}
-static bool handle_trampoline(struct pt_regs *regs)
+static void handle_trampoline(struct pt_regs *regs)
{
struct uprobe_task *utask;
struct return_instance *ri;
@@ -1778,11 +1778,11 @@ static bool handle_trampoline(struct pt_regs *regs)
utask = current->utask;
if (!utask)
- return false;
+ goto sigill;
ri = utask->return_instances;
if (!ri)
- return false;
+ goto sigill;
/*
* TODO: we should throw out return_instance's invalidated by
@@ -1804,8 +1804,12 @@ static bool handle_trampoline(struct pt_regs *regs)
}
utask->return_instances = ri;
+ return;
+
+ sigill:
+ uprobe_warn(current, "handle uretprobe, sending SIGILL.");
+ force_sig_info(SIGILL, SEND_SIG_FORCED, current);
- return true;
}
bool __weak arch_uprobe_ignore(struct arch_uprobe *aup, struct pt_regs *regs)
@@ -1824,13 +1828,8 @@ static void handle_swbp(struct pt_regs *regs)
int uninitialized_var(is_swbp);
bp_vaddr = uprobe_get_swbp_addr(regs);
- if (bp_vaddr == get_trampoline_vaddr()) {
- if (handle_trampoline(regs))
- return;
-
- pr_warn("uprobe: unable to handle uretprobe pid/tgid=%d/%d\n",
- current->pid, current->tgid);
- }
+ if (bp_vaddr == get_trampoline_vaddr())
+ return handle_trampoline(regs);
uprobe = find_active_uprobe(bp_vaddr, &is_swbp);
if (!uprobe) {
--
1.5.5.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-04 12:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-04 12:48 [PATCH 00/10] uprobes: longjmp fixes Oleg Nesterov
2015-05-04 12:48 ` [PATCH 01/10] uprobes: Introduce get_uprobe() Oleg Nesterov
2015-05-06 13:20 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2015-05-04 12:48 ` [PATCH 02/10] uprobes: Introduce free_ret_instance() Oleg Nesterov
2015-05-06 13:22 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2015-05-04 12:48 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2015-05-06 13:30 ` [PATCH 03/10] uprobes: Send SIGILL if handle_trampoline() fails Srikar Dronamraju
2015-05-04 12:49 ` [PATCH 04/10] uprobes: Change prepare_uretprobe() to use uprobe_warn() Oleg Nesterov
2015-05-07 10:32 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2015-05-04 12:49 ` [PATCH 05/10] uprobes: Change handle_trampoline() to find the next chain beforehand Oleg Nesterov
2015-05-07 10:33 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2015-05-04 12:49 ` [PATCH 06/10] uprobes: Introduce struct arch_uretprobe Oleg Nesterov
2015-05-07 10:34 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2015-05-04 12:49 ` [PATCH 07/10] uprobes/x86: Introduce arch_uretprobe_is_alive() Oleg Nesterov
2015-05-07 10:35 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2015-05-07 11:08 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2015-05-07 17:11 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-05-08 11:30 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2015-05-10 12:21 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-05-13 8:11 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2015-05-20 16:51 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-05-18 12:08 ` Pratyush Anand
2015-05-20 15:51 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-05-04 12:49 ` [PATCH 08/10] uprobes: Change handle_trampoline() to flush the frames invalidated by longjmp() Oleg Nesterov
2015-05-07 10:38 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2015-05-04 12:49 ` [PATCH 09/10] uprobes: Change prepare_uretprobe() to (try to) flush the dead frames Oleg Nesterov
2015-05-07 11:19 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2015-06-05 21:40 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-05-04 12:49 ` [PATCH 10/10] uprobes/x86: Change arch_uretprobe_is_alive() to take !chained into account Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150504124858.GA22488@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
--cc=arapov@gmail.com \
--cc=dave.long@linaro.org \
--cc=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
--cc=fche@redhat.com \
--cc=jkenisto@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mjw@redhat.com \
--cc=panand@redhat.com \
--cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=willeke@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome