From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>,
Anton Arapov <arapov@gmail.com>,
David Long <dave.long@linaro.org>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>,
"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Jan Willeke <willeke@de.ibm.com>,
Jim Keniston <jkenisto@us.ibm.com>,
Mark Wielaard <mjw@redhat.com>,
Pratyush Anand <panand@redhat.com>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 10/10] uprobes/x86: Change arch_uretprobe_is_alive() to take !chained into account
Date: Mon, 4 May 2015 14:49:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150504124926.GA22529@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150504124835.GA22462@redhat.com>
The previous change documents that cleanup_return_instances() can't
always detect the dead frames, the stack can grow. But there is one
special case which imho worth fixing: arch_uretprobe_is_alive() can
return true when the stack didn't actually grow, but the next "call"
insn uses the already invalidated frame.
Test-case:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <setjmp.h>
jmp_buf jmp;
int nr = 1024;
void func_2(void)
{
if (--nr == 0)
return;
longjmp(jmp, 1);
}
void func_1(void)
{
setjmp(jmp);
func_2();
}
int main(void)
{
func_1();
return 0;
}
If you ret-probe func_1() and func_2() prepare_uretprobe() hits the
MAX_URETPROBE_DEPTH limit and "return" from func_2() is not reported.
Add the new "bool on_call" argument to arch_uretprobe_is_alive().
prepare_uretprobe()->cleanup_return_instances() path passes "true"
when we know that we can do a more strict check to detect the dead
frames: chained == F. In this case "sp" points to the new ret-addr,
so every frame which uses the same "sp" must be dead.
Note: arch_uretprobe_is_alive() could also re-read *sp and check if
this word is still trampoline_vaddr. This could obviously improve the
logic, but I'd like to avoid another copy_from_user() especially in
a case when we can't avoid the false "alive == T" positives.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c | 10 ++++++++--
include/linux/uprobes.h | 3 ++-
kernel/events/uprobes.c | 12 +++++++-----
3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c b/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
index 868dc47..f0ace39 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
@@ -929,7 +929,13 @@ arch_uretprobe_hijack_return_addr(struct arch_uretprobe *auret,
return -1;
}
-bool arch_uretprobe_is_alive(struct arch_uretprobe *auret, struct pt_regs *regs)
+bool arch_uretprobe_is_alive(struct arch_uretprobe *auret,
+ bool on_call, struct pt_regs *regs)
{
- return regs->sp <= auret->sp;
+ unsigned long sp = regs->sp;
+
+ if (on_call) /* ->sp was just decremented by "call" insn */
+ sp += sizeof_long();
+
+ return sp <= auret->sp;
}
diff --git a/include/linux/uprobes.h b/include/linux/uprobes.h
index 1ed7502..9907be4 100644
--- a/include/linux/uprobes.h
+++ b/include/linux/uprobes.h
@@ -129,7 +129,8 @@ extern int arch_uprobe_exception_notify(struct notifier_block *self, unsigned l
extern void arch_uprobe_abort_xol(struct arch_uprobe *aup, struct pt_regs *regs);
extern unsigned long arch_uretprobe_hijack_return_addr(struct arch_uretprobe *auret,
unsigned long trampoline_vaddr, struct pt_regs *regs);
-extern bool arch_uretprobe_is_alive(struct arch_uretprobe *auret, struct pt_regs *regs);
+extern bool arch_uretprobe_is_alive(struct arch_uretprobe *auret,
+ bool on_call, struct pt_regs *regs);
extern bool arch_uprobe_ignore(struct arch_uprobe *aup, struct pt_regs *regs);
extern void arch_uprobe_copy_ixol(struct page *page, unsigned long vaddr,
void *src, unsigned long len);
diff --git a/kernel/events/uprobes.c b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
index b6433fb..ec697da 100644
--- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c
+++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
@@ -1522,10 +1522,11 @@ static unsigned long get_trampoline_vaddr(void)
return trampoline_vaddr;
}
-static void cleanup_return_instances(struct uprobe_task *utask, struct pt_regs *regs)
+static void cleanup_return_instances(struct uprobe_task *utask,
+ bool on_call, struct pt_regs *regs)
{
struct return_instance *ri = utask->return_instances;
- while (ri && !arch_uretprobe_is_alive(&ri->auret, regs)) {
+ while (ri && !arch_uretprobe_is_alive(&ri->auret, on_call, regs)) {
ri = free_ret_instance(ri);
utask->depth--;
}
@@ -1587,7 +1588,7 @@ static void prepare_uretprobe(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct pt_regs *regs)
ri->chained = chained;
if (utask->depth) /* drop the entries invalidated by longjmp() */
- cleanup_return_instances(utask, regs);
+ cleanup_return_instances(utask, !chained, regs);
utask->depth++;
ri->next = utask->return_instances;
@@ -1815,7 +1816,7 @@ static void handle_trampoline(struct pt_regs *regs)
* could hit this trampoline on return. TODO: sigaltstack().
*/
next = find_next_ret_chain(ri);
- valid = !next || arch_uretprobe_is_alive(&next->auret, regs);
+ valid = !next || arch_uretprobe_is_alive(&next->auret, false, regs);
instruction_pointer_set(regs, ri->orig_ret_vaddr);
do {
@@ -1840,7 +1841,8 @@ bool __weak arch_uprobe_ignore(struct arch_uprobe *aup, struct pt_regs *regs)
return false;
}
-bool __weak arch_uretprobe_is_alive(struct arch_uretprobe *auret, struct pt_regs *regs)
+bool __weak arch_uretprobe_is_alive(struct arch_uretprobe *auret,
+ bool on_call, struct pt_regs *regs)
{
return true;
}
--
1.5.5.1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-04 12:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-04 12:48 [PATCH 00/10] uprobes: longjmp fixes Oleg Nesterov
2015-05-04 12:48 ` [PATCH 01/10] uprobes: Introduce get_uprobe() Oleg Nesterov
2015-05-06 13:20 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2015-05-04 12:48 ` [PATCH 02/10] uprobes: Introduce free_ret_instance() Oleg Nesterov
2015-05-06 13:22 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2015-05-04 12:48 ` [PATCH 03/10] uprobes: Send SIGILL if handle_trampoline() fails Oleg Nesterov
2015-05-06 13:30 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2015-05-04 12:49 ` [PATCH 04/10] uprobes: Change prepare_uretprobe() to use uprobe_warn() Oleg Nesterov
2015-05-07 10:32 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2015-05-04 12:49 ` [PATCH 05/10] uprobes: Change handle_trampoline() to find the next chain beforehand Oleg Nesterov
2015-05-07 10:33 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2015-05-04 12:49 ` [PATCH 06/10] uprobes: Introduce struct arch_uretprobe Oleg Nesterov
2015-05-07 10:34 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2015-05-04 12:49 ` [PATCH 07/10] uprobes/x86: Introduce arch_uretprobe_is_alive() Oleg Nesterov
2015-05-07 10:35 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2015-05-07 11:08 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2015-05-07 17:11 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-05-08 11:30 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2015-05-10 12:21 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-05-13 8:11 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2015-05-20 16:51 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-05-18 12:08 ` Pratyush Anand
2015-05-20 15:51 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-05-04 12:49 ` [PATCH 08/10] uprobes: Change handle_trampoline() to flush the frames invalidated by longjmp() Oleg Nesterov
2015-05-07 10:38 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2015-05-04 12:49 ` [PATCH 09/10] uprobes: Change prepare_uretprobe() to (try to) flush the dead frames Oleg Nesterov
2015-05-07 11:19 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2015-06-05 21:40 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-05-04 12:49 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150504124926.GA22529@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
--cc=arapov@gmail.com \
--cc=dave.long@linaro.org \
--cc=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
--cc=fche@redhat.com \
--cc=jkenisto@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mjw@redhat.com \
--cc=panand@redhat.com \
--cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=willeke@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome