mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>,
	Anton Arapov <arapov@gmail.com>,
	David Long <dave.long@linaro.org>,
	Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>,
	"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Jan Willeke <willeke@de.ibm.com>,
	Jim Keniston <jkenisto@us.ibm.com>,
	Mark Wielaard <mjw@redhat.com>,
	Pratyush Anand <panand@redhat.com>,
	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 10/10] uprobes/x86: Change arch_uretprobe_is_alive() to take !chained into account
Date: Mon, 4 May 2015 14:49:26 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150504124926.GA22529@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150504124835.GA22462@redhat.com>

The previous change documents that cleanup_return_instances() can't
always detect the dead frames, the stack can grow. But there is one
special case which imho worth fixing: arch_uretprobe_is_alive() can
return true when the stack didn't actually grow, but the next "call"
insn uses the already invalidated frame.

Test-case:

	#include <stdio.h>
	#include <setjmp.h>

	jmp_buf jmp;
	int nr = 1024;

	void func_2(void)
	{
		if (--nr == 0)
			return;
		longjmp(jmp, 1);
	}

	void func_1(void)
	{
		setjmp(jmp);
		func_2();
	}

	int main(void)
	{
		func_1();
		return 0;
	}

If you ret-probe func_1() and func_2() prepare_uretprobe() hits the
MAX_URETPROBE_DEPTH limit and "return" from func_2() is not reported.

Add the new "bool on_call" argument to arch_uretprobe_is_alive().
prepare_uretprobe()->cleanup_return_instances() path passes "true"
when we know that we can do a more strict check to detect the dead
frames: chained == F. In this case "sp" points to the new ret-addr,
so every frame which uses the same "sp" must be dead.

Note: arch_uretprobe_is_alive() could also re-read *sp and check if
this word is still trampoline_vaddr. This could obviously improve the
logic, but I'd like to avoid another copy_from_user() especially in
a case when we can't avoid the false "alive == T" positives.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c |   10 ++++++++--
 include/linux/uprobes.h   |    3 ++-
 kernel/events/uprobes.c   |   12 +++++++-----
 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c b/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
index 868dc47..f0ace39 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
@@ -929,7 +929,13 @@ arch_uretprobe_hijack_return_addr(struct arch_uretprobe *auret,
 	return -1;
 }
 
-bool arch_uretprobe_is_alive(struct arch_uretprobe *auret, struct pt_regs *regs)
+bool arch_uretprobe_is_alive(struct arch_uretprobe *auret,
+				bool on_call, struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
-	return regs->sp <= auret->sp;
+	unsigned long sp = regs->sp;
+
+	if (on_call) /* ->sp was just decremented by "call" insn */
+		sp += sizeof_long();
+
+	return sp <= auret->sp;
 }
diff --git a/include/linux/uprobes.h b/include/linux/uprobes.h
index 1ed7502..9907be4 100644
--- a/include/linux/uprobes.h
+++ b/include/linux/uprobes.h
@@ -129,7 +129,8 @@ extern int  arch_uprobe_exception_notify(struct notifier_block *self, unsigned l
 extern void arch_uprobe_abort_xol(struct arch_uprobe *aup, struct pt_regs *regs);
 extern unsigned long arch_uretprobe_hijack_return_addr(struct arch_uretprobe *auret,
 					unsigned long trampoline_vaddr, struct pt_regs *regs);
-extern bool arch_uretprobe_is_alive(struct arch_uretprobe *auret, struct pt_regs *regs);
+extern bool arch_uretprobe_is_alive(struct arch_uretprobe *auret,
+					bool on_call, struct pt_regs *regs);
 extern bool arch_uprobe_ignore(struct arch_uprobe *aup, struct pt_regs *regs);
 extern void arch_uprobe_copy_ixol(struct page *page, unsigned long vaddr,
 					 void *src, unsigned long len);
diff --git a/kernel/events/uprobes.c b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
index b6433fb..ec697da 100644
--- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c
+++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
@@ -1522,10 +1522,11 @@ static unsigned long get_trampoline_vaddr(void)
 	return trampoline_vaddr;
 }
 
-static void cleanup_return_instances(struct uprobe_task *utask, struct pt_regs *regs)
+static void cleanup_return_instances(struct uprobe_task *utask,
+					bool on_call, struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
 	struct return_instance *ri = utask->return_instances;
-	while (ri && !arch_uretprobe_is_alive(&ri->auret, regs)) {
+	while (ri && !arch_uretprobe_is_alive(&ri->auret, on_call, regs)) {
 		ri = free_ret_instance(ri);
 		utask->depth--;
 	}
@@ -1587,7 +1588,7 @@ static void prepare_uretprobe(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct pt_regs *regs)
 	ri->chained = chained;
 
 	if (utask->depth) /* drop the entries invalidated by longjmp() */
-		cleanup_return_instances(utask, regs);
+		cleanup_return_instances(utask, !chained, regs);
 
 	utask->depth++;
 	ri->next = utask->return_instances;
@@ -1815,7 +1816,7 @@ static void handle_trampoline(struct pt_regs *regs)
 		 * could hit this trampoline on return. TODO: sigaltstack().
 		 */
 		next = find_next_ret_chain(ri);
-		valid = !next || arch_uretprobe_is_alive(&next->auret, regs);
+		valid = !next || arch_uretprobe_is_alive(&next->auret, false, regs);
 
 		instruction_pointer_set(regs, ri->orig_ret_vaddr);
 		do {
@@ -1840,7 +1841,8 @@ bool __weak arch_uprobe_ignore(struct arch_uprobe *aup, struct pt_regs *regs)
 	return false;
 }
 
-bool __weak arch_uretprobe_is_alive(struct arch_uretprobe *auret, struct pt_regs *regs)
+bool __weak arch_uretprobe_is_alive(struct arch_uretprobe *auret,
+					bool on_call, struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
 	return true;
 }
-- 
1.5.5.1


      parent reply	other threads:[~2015-05-04 12:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-04 12:48 [PATCH 00/10] uprobes: longjmp fixes Oleg Nesterov
2015-05-04 12:48 ` [PATCH 01/10] uprobes: Introduce get_uprobe() Oleg Nesterov
2015-05-06 13:20   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2015-05-04 12:48 ` [PATCH 02/10] uprobes: Introduce free_ret_instance() Oleg Nesterov
2015-05-06 13:22   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2015-05-04 12:48 ` [PATCH 03/10] uprobes: Send SIGILL if handle_trampoline() fails Oleg Nesterov
2015-05-06 13:30   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2015-05-04 12:49 ` [PATCH 04/10] uprobes: Change prepare_uretprobe() to use uprobe_warn() Oleg Nesterov
2015-05-07 10:32   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2015-05-04 12:49 ` [PATCH 05/10] uprobes: Change handle_trampoline() to find the next chain beforehand Oleg Nesterov
2015-05-07 10:33   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2015-05-04 12:49 ` [PATCH 06/10] uprobes: Introduce struct arch_uretprobe Oleg Nesterov
2015-05-07 10:34   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2015-05-04 12:49 ` [PATCH 07/10] uprobes/x86: Introduce arch_uretprobe_is_alive() Oleg Nesterov
2015-05-07 10:35   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2015-05-07 11:08   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2015-05-07 17:11     ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-05-08 11:30       ` Srikar Dronamraju
2015-05-10 12:21         ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-05-13  8:11           ` Srikar Dronamraju
2015-05-20 16:51             ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-05-18 12:08   ` Pratyush Anand
2015-05-20 15:51     ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-05-04 12:49 ` [PATCH 08/10] uprobes: Change handle_trampoline() to flush the frames invalidated by longjmp() Oleg Nesterov
2015-05-07 10:38   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2015-05-04 12:49 ` [PATCH 09/10] uprobes: Change prepare_uretprobe() to (try to) flush the dead frames Oleg Nesterov
2015-05-07 11:19   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2015-06-05 21:40   ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-05-04 12:49 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150504124926.GA22529@redhat.com \
    --to=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=arapov@gmail.com \
    --cc=dave.long@linaro.org \
    --cc=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
    --cc=fche@redhat.com \
    --cc=jkenisto@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=mjw@redhat.com \
    --cc=panand@redhat.com \
    --cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=willeke@de.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome