From: Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net>
To: dave@sr71.net
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 04/12] x86, pkeys: PTE bits
Date: Thu, 07 May 2015 10:41:34 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150507174134.427EFE5F@viggo.jf.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150507174132.34AF8FAF@viggo.jf.intel.com>
Previous documentation has referred to these 4 bits as "ignored".
That means that software could have made use of them. But, as
far as I know, the kernel never used them.
They are still ignored when protection keys is not enabled, so
they could theoretically still get used for software purposes.
---
b/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_types.h | 10 +++++++++-
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff -puN arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_types.h~pkeys-3-ptebits arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_types.h
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_types.h~pkeys-3-ptebits 2015-05-07 10:31:42.194223812 -0700
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_types.h 2015-05-07 10:31:42.198223992 -0700
@@ -25,7 +25,11 @@
#define _PAGE_BIT_SPLITTING _PAGE_BIT_SOFTW2 /* only valid on a PSE pmd */
#define _PAGE_BIT_HIDDEN _PAGE_BIT_SOFTW3 /* hidden by kmemcheck */
#define _PAGE_BIT_SOFT_DIRTY _PAGE_BIT_SOFTW3 /* software dirty tracking */
-#define _PAGE_BIT_NX 63 /* No execute: only valid after cpuid check */
+#define _PAGE_BIT_PKEY_BIT0 59 /* Protection Keys, bit 1/4 */
+#define _PAGE_BIT_PKEY_BIT1 60 /* Protection Keys, bit 2/4 */
+#define _PAGE_BIT_PKEY_BIT2 61 /* Protection Keys, bit 3/4 */
+#define _PAGE_BIT_PKEY_BIT3 62 /* Protection Keys, bit 4/4 */
+#define _PAGE_BIT_NX 63 /* No execute: only valid after cpuid check */
/* If _PAGE_BIT_PRESENT is clear, we use these: */
/* - if the user mapped it with PROT_NONE; pte_present gives true */
@@ -47,6 +51,10 @@
#define _PAGE_SPECIAL (_AT(pteval_t, 1) << _PAGE_BIT_SPECIAL)
#define _PAGE_CPA_TEST (_AT(pteval_t, 1) << _PAGE_BIT_CPA_TEST)
#define _PAGE_SPLITTING (_AT(pteval_t, 1) << _PAGE_BIT_SPLITTING)
+#define _PAGE_PKEY_BIT0 (_AT(pteval_t, 1) << _PAGE_BIT_PKEY_BIT0)
+#define _PAGE_PKEY_BIT1 (_AT(pteval_t, 1) << _PAGE_BIT_PKEY_BIT1)
+#define _PAGE_PKEY_BIT2 (_AT(pteval_t, 1) << _PAGE_BIT_PKEY_BIT2)
+#define _PAGE_PKEY_BIT3 (_AT(pteval_t, 1) << _PAGE_BIT_PKEY_BIT3)
#define __HAVE_ARCH_PTE_SPECIAL
#ifdef CONFIG_KMEMCHECK
_
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-07 17:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-07 17:41 [PATCH 00/12] [RFC] x86: Memory Protection Keys Dave Hansen
2015-05-07 17:41 ` [PATCH 01/12] x86, pkeys: cpuid bit definition Dave Hansen
2015-05-07 17:41 ` [PATCH 02/12] x86, pku: define new CR4 bit Dave Hansen
2015-05-07 17:41 ` [PATCH 05/12] x86, pkeys: new page fault error code bit: PF_PK Dave Hansen
2015-05-07 17:41 ` [PATCH 03/12] x86, pkey: pkru xsave fields and data structure Dave Hansen
2015-05-07 17:41 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2015-05-07 17:41 ` [PATCH 06/12] x86, pkeys: store protection in high VMA flags Dave Hansen
2015-05-15 21:10 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-05-15 21:13 ` Dave Hansen
2015-05-07 17:41 ` [PATCH 08/12] x86, pkeys: arch-specific protection bits Dave Hansen
2015-05-07 17:41 ` [PATCH 07/12] mm: Pass the 4-bit protection key in via PROT_ bits to syscalls Dave Hansen
2015-05-07 19:11 ` One Thousand Gnomes
2015-05-07 19:19 ` Dave Hansen
2015-09-04 20:13 ` Florian Weimer
2015-09-04 20:18 ` Dave Hansen
2015-09-04 20:34 ` Florian Weimer
2015-09-04 20:41 ` Dave Hansen
2015-05-07 17:41 ` [PATCH 12/12] x86, pkeys: Documentation Dave Hansen
2015-05-07 17:41 ` [PATCH 09/12] x86, pkeys: notify userspace about protection key faults Dave Hansen
2015-05-07 17:41 ` [PATCH 11/12] x86, pkeys: actually enable Memory Protection Keys in CPU Dave Hansen
2015-05-07 17:41 ` [PATCH 10/12] x86, pkeys: differentiate Protection Key faults from normal Dave Hansen
2015-05-07 17:57 ` [PATCH 00/12] [RFC] x86: Memory Protection Keys Ingo Molnar
2015-05-07 18:09 ` Dave Hansen
2015-05-07 18:48 ` Vlastimil Babka
2015-05-07 21:45 ` Dave Hansen
2015-05-09 19:09 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2015-05-07 19:18 ` One Thousand Gnomes
2015-05-07 19:26 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-05-07 19:40 ` Dave Hansen
2015-05-07 20:11 ` One Thousand Gnomes
2015-05-08 4:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-05-08 6:09 ` Kevin Easton
2015-05-07 19:22 ` Christian Borntraeger
2015-05-07 19:29 ` Dave Hansen
2015-05-07 19:45 ` Christian Borntraeger
2015-05-07 19:49 ` Dave Hansen
2015-05-07 19:57 ` Christian Borntraeger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150507174134.427EFE5F@viggo.jf.intel.com \
--to=dave@sr71.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome