mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: "Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch V1 2/3] x86, mce: Add infrastructure required to support LMCE
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2015 21:37:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150601193733.GB17187@pd.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150601184857.GA9646@linux.intel.com>

On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 11:48:57AM -0700, Raj, Ashok wrote:
> If you got a blank email, sorry about that. Its been a while since i used
> mutt and my setup was goofed up probably. Or i might have read your 
> signature a bit too literally :-)

LOL.

> I did re-organize this to read better in my upcoming post. But in
> general reading FEATURE_CONTROL isn't bad. It wont trip on a #GP for
> e.g. FEATURE_CONTROL has been around for a while.

Are you sure? Have you checked booting on qemu+kvm too?

I mean, I'm fine with whatever MSR access ordering we do as long as
nothing breaks. Obviously.

> Good point. Its required by architecture, since it depends on recovery
> support in processors to work. I forgot to add that to the SDM when
> i made those updates. I will update the SDM appropriately on my next
> attempt at it.

Ok, cool. Please add this fact to the commit message too.

> Sorry about my config challenges.. hopefully this makes it out with
> all the responses :-)

No worries, looks good :-)

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--

  reply	other threads:[~2015-06-01 19:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-29 16:27 [Patch V1 0/3] x86 Local Machine Check Exception (LMCE) Ashok Raj
2015-05-29 16:28 ` [Patch V1 1/3] x86, mce: Add LMCE definitions Ashok Raj
2015-05-29 16:28 ` [Patch V1 2/3] x86, mce: Add infrastructure required to support LMCE Ashok Raj
2015-05-29 17:35   ` Borislav Petkov
2015-05-29 17:44   ` Borislav Petkov
2015-06-01 17:09     ` Raj, Ashok
2015-06-01 18:48     ` Raj, Ashok
2015-06-01 19:37       ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2015-05-29 16:28 ` [Patch V1 3/3] x86, mce: Handling LMCE events Ashok Raj
2015-05-29 17:36   ` Borislav Petkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150601193733.GB17187@pd.tnic \
    --to=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
    --cc=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®