From: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Louis Langholtz <lou_langholtz@me.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
trivial@kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel/params.c: make use of unused but set variable
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2015 10:48:31 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150612014831.GG6336@mtj.duckdns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87zj45g1hf.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 10:57:24AM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
> Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> writes:
> > On Sun, Jun 7, 2015 at 5:00 PM, Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com> wrote:
> > At most, it could be a "WARN_ON_ONCE()". Maybe even just silently
> > ignore the error. But BUG_ON()? Hell no.
>
> Yeah, in practice it's already (1) paniced if we ran out of memory, or
> (2) warned if we somehow tried to create two entries with the same name.
>
> So the WARN_ON_ONCE() is a bit... meh. How's this, too snarky?
Sounds pretty passive agressive to me. At least reply to the actual
argument?
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-12 1:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=143351431301630>
2015-06-07 23:54 ` Louis Langholtz
2015-06-08 0:00 ` Tejun Heo
2015-06-08 0:17 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-06-08 0:58 ` Tejun Heo
2015-06-08 5:24 ` [PATCH v2] " Louis Langholtz
2015-06-10 17:05 ` [PATCH] " Louis Langholtz
2015-06-11 1:54 ` Tejun Heo
2015-06-12 3:17 ` Louis Langholtz
2015-06-08 5:44 ` [PATCH] checkpatch: Warn on BUG and BUG_ON uses Joe Perches
2015-06-08 5:46 ` [PATCH] kernel/params.c: make use of unused but set variable Louis Langholtz
2015-06-08 7:12 ` [PATCH] debug: Deprecate BUG_ON() use in new code, introduce CRASH_ON() Ingo Molnar
2015-06-08 7:40 ` Alexander Holler
2015-06-08 8:08 ` Richard Weinberger
2015-06-08 8:42 ` Alexander Holler
2015-06-08 9:05 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-06-08 9:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-06-08 9:22 ` Alexander Holler
2015-06-08 11:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-06-08 9:16 ` Alexander Holler
2015-06-08 11:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-06-08 18:07 ` Alexander Holler
2015-06-08 19:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-06-09 1:07 ` Alexander Holler
2015-06-08 8:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-06-12 1:27 ` [PATCH] kernel/params.c: make use of unused but set variable Rusty Russell
2015-06-12 1:48 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2015-06-14 19:49 ` Rusty Russell
2015-06-16 19:54 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150612014831.GG6336@mtj.duckdns.org \
--to=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lou_langholtz@me.com \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=trivial@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome