From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: oleg@redhat.com, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: tj@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
der.herr@hofr.at, peterz@infradead.org, dave@stgolabs.net,
riel@redhat.com, viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 10/13] fs/locks: Replace lg_global with a percpu-rwsem
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 14:16:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150622122256.585322580@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150622121623.291363374@infradead.org>
[-- Attachment #1: peterz-fslocks-rwsem.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 5096 bytes --]
Replace the global part of the lglock with a percpu-rwsem.
Since fcl_lock is a spinlock and itself nests under i_lock, which too
is a spinlock we cannot acquire sleeping locks at
locks_{insert,remove}_global_locks().
We can however wrap all fcl_lock acquisitions with percpu_down_read
such that all invocations of locks_{insert,remove}_global_locks() have
that read lock held.
This allows us to replace the lg_global part of the lglock with the
write side of the rwsem.
In the absense of writers, percpu_{down,up}_read() are free of atomic
instructions. This further avoids the very long preempt-disable
regions caused by lglock on larger machines.
Cc: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---
fs/locks.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
--- a/fs/locks.c
+++ b/fs/locks.c
@@ -165,6 +165,7 @@ int lease_break_time = 45;
*/
DEFINE_STATIC_LGLOCK(file_lock_lglock);
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct hlist_head, file_lock_list);
+static struct percpu_rw_semaphore file_rwsem;
/*
* The blocked_hash is used to find POSIX lock loops for deadlock detection.
@@ -556,6 +557,8 @@ static int posix_same_owner(struct file_
/* Must be called with the flc_lock held! */
static void locks_insert_global_locks(struct file_lock *fl)
{
+ lockdep_assert_held_percpu_rwsem(&file_rwsem);
+
lg_local_lock(&file_lock_lglock);
fl->fl_link_cpu = smp_processor_id();
hlist_add_head(&fl->fl_link, this_cpu_ptr(&file_lock_list));
@@ -565,6 +568,8 @@ static void locks_insert_global_locks(st
/* Must be called with the flc_lock held! */
static void locks_delete_global_locks(struct file_lock *fl)
{
+ lockdep_assert_held_percpu_rwsem(&file_rwsem);
+
/*
* Avoid taking lock if already unhashed. This is safe since this check
* is done while holding the flc_lock, and new insertions into the list
@@ -885,6 +890,7 @@ static int flock_lock_file(struct file *
return -ENOMEM;
}
+ percpu_down_read(&file_rwsem);
spin_lock(&ctx->flc_lock);
if (request->fl_flags & FL_ACCESS)
goto find_conflict;
@@ -925,6 +931,7 @@ static int flock_lock_file(struct file *
out:
spin_unlock(&ctx->flc_lock);
+ percpu_up_read(&file_rwsem);
if (new_fl)
locks_free_lock(new_fl);
locks_dispose_list(&dispose);
@@ -960,6 +967,7 @@ static int __posix_lock_file(struct inod
new_fl2 = locks_alloc_lock();
}
+ percpu_down_read(&file_rwsem);
spin_lock(&ctx->flc_lock);
/*
* New lock request. Walk all POSIX locks and look for conflicts. If
@@ -1131,6 +1139,7 @@ static int __posix_lock_file(struct inod
}
out:
spin_unlock(&ctx->flc_lock);
+ percpu_up_read(&file_rwsem);
/*
* Free any unused locks.
*/
@@ -1407,6 +1416,7 @@ int __break_lease(struct inode *inode, u
return error;
}
+ percpu_down_read(&file_rwsem);
spin_lock(&ctx->flc_lock);
time_out_leases(inode, &dispose);
@@ -1477,6 +1487,7 @@ int __break_lease(struct inode *inode, u
}
out:
spin_unlock(&ctx->flc_lock);
+ percpu_up_read(&file_rwsem);
locks_dispose_list(&dispose);
locks_free_lock(new_fl);
return error;
@@ -1630,6 +1641,7 @@ generic_add_lease(struct file *filp, lon
return -EINVAL;
}
+ percpu_down_read(&file_rwsem);
spin_lock(&ctx->flc_lock);
time_out_leases(inode, &dispose);
error = check_conflicting_open(dentry, arg, lease->fl_flags);
@@ -1700,6 +1712,7 @@ generic_add_lease(struct file *filp, lon
lease->fl_lmops->lm_setup(lease, priv);
out:
spin_unlock(&ctx->flc_lock);
+ percpu_up_read(&file_rwsem);
locks_dispose_list(&dispose);
if (is_deleg)
mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);
@@ -1722,6 +1735,7 @@ static int generic_delete_lease(struct f
return error;
}
+ percpu_down_read(&file_rwsem);
spin_lock(&ctx->flc_lock);
list_for_each_entry(fl, &ctx->flc_lease, fl_list) {
if (fl->fl_file == filp &&
@@ -1734,6 +1748,7 @@ static int generic_delete_lease(struct f
if (victim)
error = fl->fl_lmops->lm_change(victim, F_UNLCK, &dispose);
spin_unlock(&ctx->flc_lock);
+ percpu_up_read(&file_rwsem);
locks_dispose_list(&dispose);
return error;
}
@@ -2634,6 +2649,7 @@ static void *locks_start(struct seq_file
struct locks_iterator *iter = f->private;
iter->li_pos = *pos + 1;
+ percpu_down_write(&file_rwsem);
lg_global_lock(&file_lock_lglock);
spin_lock(&blocked_lock_lock);
return seq_hlist_start_percpu(&file_lock_list, &iter->li_cpu, *pos);
@@ -2652,6 +2668,7 @@ static void locks_stop(struct seq_file *
{
spin_unlock(&blocked_lock_lock);
lg_global_unlock(&file_lock_lglock);
+ percpu_up_write(&file_rwsem);
}
static const struct seq_operations locks_seq_operations = {
@@ -2693,6 +2710,7 @@ static int __init filelock_init(void)
sizeof(struct file_lock), 0, SLAB_PANIC, NULL);
lg_lock_init(&file_lock_lglock, "file_lock_lglock");
+ percpu_init_rwsem(&file_rwsem);
for_each_possible_cpu(i)
INIT_HLIST_HEAD(per_cpu_ptr(&file_lock_list, i));
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-22 12:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 106+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-22 12:16 [RFC][PATCH 00/13] percpu rwsem -v2 Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-22 12:16 ` [RFC][PATCH 01/13] rcu: Create rcu_sync infrastructure Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-22 12:16 ` [RFC][PATCH 02/13] rcusync: Introduce struct rcu_sync_ops Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-22 12:16 ` [RFC][PATCH 03/13] rcusync: Add the CONFIG_PROVE_RCU checks Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-22 12:16 ` [RFC][PATCH 04/13] rcusync: Introduce rcu_sync_dtor() Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-22 12:16 ` [RFC][PATCH 05/13] percpu-rwsem: Optimize readers and reduce global impact Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-22 23:02 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-06-23 7:28 ` Nicholas Mc Guire
2015-06-25 19:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-25 19:17 ` Tejun Heo
2015-06-29 9:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-29 15:12 ` Tejun Heo
2015-06-29 15:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-22 12:16 ` [RFC][PATCH 06/13] percpu-rwsem: Provide percpu_down_read_trylock() Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-22 23:08 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-06-22 12:16 ` [RFC][PATCH 07/13] sched: Reorder task_struct Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-22 12:16 ` [RFC][PATCH 08/13] percpu-rwsem: DEFINE_STATIC_PERCPU_RWSEM Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-22 12:16 ` [RFC][PATCH 09/13] hotplug: Replace hotplug lock with percpu-rwsem Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-22 22:57 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-06-23 7:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-23 17:01 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-06-23 17:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-24 13:50 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-06-24 14:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-24 15:12 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-06-24 16:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-28 23:56 ` [PATCH 0/3] percpu-rwsem: introduce percpu_rw_semaphore->recursive mode Oleg Nesterov
2015-06-28 23:56 ` [PATCH 1/3] rcusync: introduce rcu_sync_struct->exclusive mode Oleg Nesterov
2015-06-28 23:56 ` [PATCH 2/3] percpu-rwsem: don't use percpu_rw_semaphore->rw_sem to exclude writers Oleg Nesterov
2015-06-28 23:56 ` [PATCH 3/3] percpu-rwsem: introduce percpu_rw_semaphore->recursive mode Oleg Nesterov
2015-06-22 12:16 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2015-06-22 12:16 ` [RFC][PATCH 11/13] fs/locks: Replace lg_local with a per-cpu spinlock Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-23 0:19 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-06-22 12:16 ` [RFC][PATCH 12/13] stop_machine: Remove lglock Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-22 22:21 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-06-23 10:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-23 10:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-23 11:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-23 13:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-23 16:36 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-06-23 17:30 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-23 18:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-23 18:26 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-23 19:05 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-24 2:23 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-24 8:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-24 9:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-24 13:48 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-24 15:01 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-24 15:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-24 7:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-24 8:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-06-24 13:39 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-24 13:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-06-24 14:03 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-24 14:50 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-24 15:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-24 15:27 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-24 15:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-24 16:09 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-24 16:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-24 17:10 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-24 17:20 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-24 17:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-24 17:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-24 17:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-24 18:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-24 17:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-25 3:23 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-25 11:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-25 13:47 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-25 14:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-25 14:51 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-26 12:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-26 16:14 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-29 7:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-30 21:32 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-07-01 11:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-01 15:56 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-07-01 16:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-01 18:45 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-23 14:39 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-23 16:20 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-06-23 17:24 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-06-25 19:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-22 12:16 ` [RFC][PATCH 13/13] locking: " Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-22 12:36 ` [RFC][PATCH 00/13] percpu rwsem -v2 Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-22 18:11 ` Daniel Wagner
2015-06-22 19:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-23 9:35 ` Daniel Wagner
2015-06-23 10:00 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-06-23 14:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-23 14:56 ` Daniel Wagner
2015-06-23 17:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-23 19:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-24 8:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-06-24 9:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-24 9:18 ` Daniel Wagner
2015-07-01 5:57 ` Daniel Wagner
2015-07-01 21:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-07-02 9:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-20 5:53 ` Daniel Wagner
2015-07-20 18:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-06-22 20:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-06-23 16:10 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2015-06-23 16:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150622122256.585322580@infradead.org \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=der.herr@hofr.at \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome