mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	tj@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	der.herr@hofr.at, dave@stgolabs.net, riel@redhat.com,
	viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk, torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 12/13] stop_machine: Remove lglock
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2015 10:20:18 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150624172005.GA6905@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150624171004.GG3717@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 10:10:04AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 06:42:00PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 09:09:04AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:

[ . . . ]

> > > It looks like I do need to use smp_call_function_single() and your
> > > resched_cpu() because calling stop_one_cpu() sequentially is about
> > > twice as slow as try_stop_cpus() in rcutorture runs of up to 16 CPUs.
> > > But either way, your point about not stopping all the CPUs does hold.
> > 
> > Bah, I was afraid of that, the problem is that we wait for the
> > individual stop_work to complete before sending another.
> > 
> > The below is getting a little out of hand, but should avoid the problem
> > and might be easier than getting the IPI think going, but who knows.
> 
> OK, I will give this a try.  Of course, the counter needs to be
> initialized to 1 rather than zero, and it needs to be atomically
> decremented after all stop_one_cpu_nowait() invocations, otherwise you
> can get an early wakeup due to the usual race conditions.

Except that I promised Ingo I would check for CPUs failing to schedule
quickly enough, which means that I must track them individually rather
than via a single counter...

You did have me going for a bit, though!  ;-)

							Thanx, Paul

> > ---
> > --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> > +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> > @@ -103,6 +103,7 @@ struct rcu_state sname##_state = { \
> >  	.orphan_nxttail = &sname##_state.orphan_nxtlist, \
> >  	.orphan_donetail = &sname##_state.orphan_donelist, \
> >  	.barrier_mutex = __MUTEX_INITIALIZER(sname##_state.barrier_mutex), \
> > +	.expedited_mutex = __MUTEX_INITIALIZER(sname##_state.expedited_mutex), \
> >  	.name = RCU_STATE_NAME(sname), \
> >  	.abbr = sabbr, \
> >  }
> > @@ -3253,23 +3254,28 @@ void cond_synchronize_rcu(unsigned long
> >  }
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cond_synchronize_rcu);
> > 
> > +struct exp_stop_state {
> > +	wait_queue_head_t	*wq;
> > +	atomic_t		count;
> > +};
> > +
> >  static int synchronize_sched_expedited_cpu_stop(void *data)
> >  {
> > +	struct exp_stop_state *ess = data;
> > +
> >  	/*
> >  	 * There must be a full memory barrier on each affected CPU
> >  	 * between the time that try_stop_cpus() is called and the
> >  	 * time that it returns.
> > -	 *
> > -	 * In the current initial implementation of cpu_stop, the
> > -	 * above condition is already met when the control reaches
> > -	 * this point and the following smp_mb() is not strictly
> > -	 * necessary.  Do smp_mb() anyway for documentation and
> > -	 * robustness against future implementation changes.
> >  	 */
> > -	smp_mb(); /* See above comment block. */
> > +	if (atomic_dec_and_test(&ess->count))
> > +		wake_up(ess->wq);
> > +
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> > 
> > +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cpu_stop_work, exp_stop_work);
> > +
> >  /**
> >   * synchronize_sched_expedited - Brute-force RCU-sched grace period
> >   *
> > @@ -3304,12 +3310,11 @@ static int synchronize_sched_expedited_c
> >   */
> >  void synchronize_sched_expedited(void)
> >  {
> > -	cpumask_var_t cm;
> > -	bool cma = false;
> > -	int cpu;
> > -	long firstsnap, s, snap;
> > -	int trycount = 0;
> > +	DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD_ONSTACK(stop_wait);
> > +	struct exp_stop_state ess = { .wq = &stop_wait, };
> >  	struct rcu_state *rsp = &rcu_sched_state;
> > +	long s, snap;
> > +	int cpu;
> > 
> >  	/*
> >  	 * If we are in danger of counter wrap, just do synchronize_sched().
> > @@ -3332,7 +3337,6 @@ void synchronize_sched_expedited(void)
> >  	 * full memory barrier.
> >  	 */
> >  	snap = atomic_long_inc_return(&rsp->expedited_start);
> > -	firstsnap = snap;
> >  	if (!try_get_online_cpus()) {
> >  		/* CPU hotplug operation in flight, fall back to normal GP. */
> >  		wait_rcu_gp(call_rcu_sched);
> > @@ -3341,82 +3345,44 @@ void synchronize_sched_expedited(void)
> >  	}
> >  	WARN_ON_ONCE(cpu_is_offline(raw_smp_processor_id()));
> > 
> > -	/* Offline CPUs, idle CPUs, and any CPU we run on are quiescent. */
> > -	cma = zalloc_cpumask_var(&cm, GFP_KERNEL);
> > -	if (cma) {
> > -		cpumask_copy(cm, cpu_online_mask);
> > -		cpumask_clear_cpu(raw_smp_processor_id(), cm);
> > -		for_each_cpu(cpu, cm) {
> > -			struct rcu_dynticks *rdtp = &per_cpu(rcu_dynticks, cpu);
> > -
> > -			if (!(atomic_add_return(0, &rdtp->dynticks) & 0x1))
> > -				cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, cm);
> > -		}
> > -		if (cpumask_weight(cm) == 0)
> > -			goto all_cpus_idle;
> > -	}
> > -
> >  	/*
> >  	 * Each pass through the following loop attempts to force a
> >  	 * context switch on each CPU.
> >  	 */
> > -	while (try_stop_cpus(cma ? cm : cpu_online_mask,
> > -			     synchronize_sched_expedited_cpu_stop,
> > -			     NULL) == -EAGAIN) {
> > -		put_online_cpus();
> > -		atomic_long_inc(&rsp->expedited_tryfail);
> > +	mutex_lock(&rsp->expedited_mutex);
> > 
> > -		/* Check to see if someone else did our work for us. */
> > -		s = atomic_long_read(&rsp->expedited_done);
> > -		if (ULONG_CMP_GE((ulong)s, (ulong)firstsnap)) {
> > -			/* ensure test happens before caller kfree */
> > -			smp_mb__before_atomic(); /* ^^^ */
> > -			atomic_long_inc(&rsp->expedited_workdone1);
> > -			free_cpumask_var(cm);
> > -			return;
> > -		}
> > +	/*
> > +	 * Check to see if someone else did our work for us, while we were
> > +	 * waiting for the mutex.
> > +	 */
> > +	s = atomic_long_read(&rsp->expedited_done);
> > +	if (ULONG_CMP_GE((ulong)s, (ulong)snap)) {
> > +		/* ensure test happens before caller kfree */
> > +		smp_mb__before_atomic(); /* ^^^ */
> > +		atomic_long_inc(&rsp->expedited_workdone1);
> > +		goto unlock;
> > +	}
> > 
> > -		/* No joy, try again later.  Or just synchronize_sched(). */
> > -		if (trycount++ < 10) {
> > -			udelay(trycount * num_online_cpus());
> > -		} else {
> > -			wait_rcu_gp(call_rcu_sched);
> > -			atomic_long_inc(&rsp->expedited_normal);
> > -			free_cpumask_var(cm);
> > -			return;
> > -		}
> > +	/* Stop each CPU that is online, non-idle, and not us. */
> > +	for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
> > +		struct rcu_dynticks *rdtp = &per_cpu(rcu_dynticks, cpu);
> > 
> > -		/* Recheck to see if someone else did our work for us. */
> > -		s = atomic_long_read(&rsp->expedited_done);
> > -		if (ULONG_CMP_GE((ulong)s, (ulong)firstsnap)) {
> > -			/* ensure test happens before caller kfree */
> > -			smp_mb__before_atomic(); /* ^^^ */
> > -			atomic_long_inc(&rsp->expedited_workdone2);
> > -			free_cpumask_var(cm);
> > -			return;
> > -		}
> > +		/* Skip our CPU, */
> > +		if (raw_smp_processor_id() == cpu)
> > +			continue;
> > 
> > -		/*
> > -		 * Refetching sync_sched_expedited_started allows later
> > -		 * callers to piggyback on our grace period.  We retry
> > -		 * after they started, so our grace period works for them,
> > -		 * and they started after our first try, so their grace
> > -		 * period works for us.
> > -		 */
> > -		if (!try_get_online_cpus()) {
> > -			/* CPU hotplug operation in flight, use normal GP. */
> > -			wait_rcu_gp(call_rcu_sched);
> > -			atomic_long_inc(&rsp->expedited_normal);
> > -			free_cpumask_var(cm);
> > -			return;
> > -		}
> > -		snap = atomic_long_read(&rsp->expedited_start);
> > -		smp_mb(); /* ensure read is before try_stop_cpus(). */
> > +		/* and any idle CPUs. */
> > +		if (!(atomic_add_return(0, &rdtp->dynticks) & 0x1))
> > +			continue;
> > +
> > +		atomic_inc(&ess.count);
> > +		stop_one_cpu_nowait(cpu, synchronize_sched_expedited_cpu_stop, ,
> > +				&per_cpu(exp_stop_work, cpu));
> >  	}
> > -	atomic_long_inc(&rsp->expedited_stoppedcpus);
> > 
> > -all_cpus_idle:
> > -	free_cpumask_var(cm);
> > +	wait_event(ess.wq, !atomic_read(&ess.count));
> > +
> > +	atomic_long_inc(&rsp->expedited_stoppedcpus);
> > 
> >  	/*
> >  	 * Everyone up to our most recent fetch is covered by our grace
> > @@ -3435,6 +3401,8 @@ void synchronize_sched_expedited(void)
> >  		}
> >  	} while (atomic_long_cmpxchg(&rsp->expedited_done, s, snap) != s);
> >  	atomic_long_inc(&rsp->expedited_done_exit);
> > +unlock:
> > +	mutex_unlock(&rsp->expedited_mutex);
> > 
> >  	put_online_cpus();
> >  }
> > --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.h
> > +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
> > @@ -483,6 +483,7 @@ struct rcu_state {
> >  						/*  _rcu_barrier(). */
> >  	/* End of fields guarded by barrier_mutex. */
> > 
> > +	struct mutex  expedited_mutex;		/* Serializes expediting. */
> >  	atomic_long_t expedited_start;		/* Starting ticket. */
> >  	atomic_long_t expedited_done;		/* Done ticket. */
> >  	atomic_long_t expedited_wrap;		/* # near-wrap incidents. */
> > 


  reply	other threads:[~2015-06-24 17:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 106+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-06-22 12:16 [RFC][PATCH 00/13] percpu rwsem -v2 Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-22 12:16 ` [RFC][PATCH 01/13] rcu: Create rcu_sync infrastructure Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-22 12:16 ` [RFC][PATCH 02/13] rcusync: Introduce struct rcu_sync_ops Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-22 12:16 ` [RFC][PATCH 03/13] rcusync: Add the CONFIG_PROVE_RCU checks Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-22 12:16 ` [RFC][PATCH 04/13] rcusync: Introduce rcu_sync_dtor() Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-22 12:16 ` [RFC][PATCH 05/13] percpu-rwsem: Optimize readers and reduce global impact Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-22 23:02   ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-06-23  7:28   ` Nicholas Mc Guire
2015-06-25 19:08     ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-25 19:17       ` Tejun Heo
2015-06-29  9:32         ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-29 15:12           ` Tejun Heo
2015-06-29 15:14             ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-22 12:16 ` [RFC][PATCH 06/13] percpu-rwsem: Provide percpu_down_read_trylock() Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-22 23:08   ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-06-22 12:16 ` [RFC][PATCH 07/13] sched: Reorder task_struct Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-22 12:16 ` [RFC][PATCH 08/13] percpu-rwsem: DEFINE_STATIC_PERCPU_RWSEM Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-22 12:16 ` [RFC][PATCH 09/13] hotplug: Replace hotplug lock with percpu-rwsem Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-22 22:57   ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-06-23  7:16     ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-23 17:01       ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-06-23 17:53         ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-24 13:50           ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-06-24 14:13             ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-24 15:12               ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-06-24 16:15                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-28 23:56             ` [PATCH 0/3] percpu-rwsem: introduce percpu_rw_semaphore->recursive mode Oleg Nesterov
2015-06-28 23:56               ` [PATCH 1/3] rcusync: introduce rcu_sync_struct->exclusive mode Oleg Nesterov
2015-06-28 23:56               ` [PATCH 2/3] percpu-rwsem: don't use percpu_rw_semaphore->rw_sem to exclude writers Oleg Nesterov
2015-06-28 23:56               ` [PATCH 3/3] percpu-rwsem: introduce percpu_rw_semaphore->recursive mode Oleg Nesterov
2015-06-22 12:16 ` [RFC][PATCH 10/13] fs/locks: Replace lg_global with a percpu-rwsem Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-22 12:16 ` [RFC][PATCH 11/13] fs/locks: Replace lg_local with a per-cpu spinlock Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-23  0:19   ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-06-22 12:16 ` [RFC][PATCH 12/13] stop_machine: Remove lglock Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-22 22:21   ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-06-23 10:09     ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-23 10:55       ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-23 11:20         ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-23 13:08           ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-23 16:36             ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-06-23 17:30             ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-23 18:04               ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-23 18:26                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-23 19:05                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-24  2:23                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-24  8:32                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-24  9:31                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-24 13:48                           ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-24 15:01                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-24 15:34                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-24  7:35                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-24  8:42                     ` Ingo Molnar
2015-06-24 13:39                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-24 13:43                         ` Ingo Molnar
2015-06-24 14:03                           ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-24 14:50                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-24 15:01                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-24 15:27                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-24 15:40                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-24 16:09                             ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-24 16:42                               ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-24 17:10                                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-24 17:20                                   ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2015-06-24 17:29                                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-24 17:28                                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-24 17:32                                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-24 18:14                                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-24 17:58                                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-25  3:23                                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-25 11:07                                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-25 13:47                                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-25 14:20                                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-25 14:51                                             ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-26 12:32                                               ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-26 16:14                                                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-29  7:56                                                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-30 21:32                                                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-07-01 11:56                                                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-01 15:56                                                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-07-01 16:16                                                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-01 18:45                                                             ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-23 14:39         ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-23 16:20       ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-06-23 17:24         ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-06-25 19:18           ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-22 12:16 ` [RFC][PATCH 13/13] locking: " Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-22 12:36 ` [RFC][PATCH 00/13] percpu rwsem -v2 Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-22 18:11 ` Daniel Wagner
2015-06-22 19:05   ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-23  9:35     ` Daniel Wagner
2015-06-23 10:00       ` Ingo Molnar
2015-06-23 14:34       ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-23 14:56         ` Daniel Wagner
2015-06-23 17:50           ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-23 19:36             ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-24  8:46               ` Ingo Molnar
2015-06-24  9:01                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-24  9:18                 ` Daniel Wagner
2015-07-01  5:57                   ` Daniel Wagner
2015-07-01 21:54                     ` Linus Torvalds
2015-07-02  9:41                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-20  5:53                         ` Daniel Wagner
2015-07-20 18:44                           ` Linus Torvalds
2015-06-22 20:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-06-23 16:10 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2015-06-23 16:21   ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150624172005.GA6905@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=der.herr@hofr.at \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome