mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
	Jason Baron <jasonbaron0@gmail.com>,
	Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	Vince Weaver <vince@deater.net>,
	"hillf.zj" <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com>,
	Valdis Kletnieks <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: Kernel broken on processors without performance counters
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 17:49:59 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150721154959.GS19282@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1507211726040.18576@nanos>

On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 05:43:27PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Jul 2015, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> 
> > > -#endif	/* _LINUX_JUMP_LABEL_H */
> > > +static inline void static_key_enable(struct static_key *key)
> > > +{
> > > +	int count = static_key_count(key);
> > > +
> > > +	WARN_ON_ONCE(count < 0 || count > 1);
> > > +
> > > +	if (!count)
> > > +		static_key_slow_inc(key);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static inline void static_key_disable(struct static_key *key)
> > > +{
> > > +	int count = static_key_count(key);
> > > +
> > > +	WARN_ON_ONCE(count < 0 || count > 1);
> > > +
> > > +	if (count)
> > > +		static_key_slow_dec(key);
> > > +}
> 
> The functions above are not part of the interface which should be used
> in code, right?

They are in fact. They make it easier to deal with the refcount thing
when all you want is boolean states.

> > > +/* -------------------------------------------------------------------------- */
> > > +
> > > +/*
> > > + * likely -- default enabled, puts the branch body in-line
> > > + */
> > > +
> > > +struct static_likely_key {
> > > +	struct static_key key;
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +#define STATIC_LIKELY_KEY_INIT	(struct static_likely_key){ .key = STATIC_KEY_INIT_TRUE, }
> > > +
> > > +static inline bool static_likely_branch(struct static_likely_key *key)
> > > +{
> > > +	return static_key_true(&key->key);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +/*
> > > + * unlikely -- default disabled, puts the branch body out-of-line
> > > + */
> > > +
> > > +struct static_unlikely_key {
> > > +	struct static_key key;
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +#define STATIC_UNLIKELY_KEY_INIT (struct static_unlikely_key){ .key = STATIC_KEY_INIT_FALSE, }
> > > +
> > > +static inline bool static_unlikely_branch(struct static_unlikely_key *key)
> > > +{
> > > +	return static_key_false(&key->key);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +/*
> > > + * Advanced usage; refcount, branch is enabled when: count != 0
> > > + */
> > > +
> > > +#define static_branch_inc(_k)	static_key_slow_inc(&(_k)->key)
> > > +#define static_branch_dec(_k)	static_key_slow_dec(&(_k)->key)
> 
> Inlines please
> 
> > > +/*
> > > + * Normal usage; boolean enable/disable.
> > > + */
> > > +
> > > +#define static_branch_enable(_k)	static_key_enable(&(_k)->key)
> > > +#define static_branch_disable(_k)	static_key_disable(&(_k)->key)
> 
> Ditto
> 
> All in all much more understandable than the existing horror.

They cannot in fact be inlines because we play type tricks. Note how _k
can be either struct static_likely_key or struct static_unlikely_key.



  reply	other threads:[~2015-07-21 15:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-08 15:17 Mikulas Patocka
2015-07-08 16:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-08 16:54   ` Mikulas Patocka
2015-07-09 17:23     ` [PATCH] x86: Fix static_key in load_mm_cr4() Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-09 19:11       ` Mikulas Patocka
2015-07-10  8:27       ` [tip:perf/urgent] x86, perf: Fix static_key bug " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-08 17:37   ` Kernel broken on processors without performance counters Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-08 20:04     ` Jason Baron
2015-07-09  0:36       ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-10 14:13         ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-10 15:29           ` Jason Baron
2015-07-21  8:21           ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-21 15:43             ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-07-21 15:49               ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2015-07-21 15:51                 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-21 16:12                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-21 16:57                     ` Jason Baron
2015-07-23 14:54                       ` Steven Rostedt
2015-07-21 18:15                     ` Borislav Petkov
2015-07-21 18:50                       ` Jason Baron
2015-07-21 18:54                         ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-21 19:00                           ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2015-07-21 19:29                             ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-21 23:49                               ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2015-07-22  4:24                         ` Borislav Petkov
2015-07-22 17:06                           ` Jason Baron
2015-07-23 10:42                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-23 10:53                               ` Borislav Petkov
2015-07-23 14:19                               ` Jason Baron
2015-07-23 14:33                                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-23 14:49                                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-23 19:14                                     ` Jason Baron
2015-07-24 10:56                                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-24 12:36                                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-24 14:15                                           ` Jason Baron
2015-07-23 14:58                                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-23 15:34                               ` Steven Rostedt
2015-07-23 17:08                                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-23 17:18                                   ` Steven Rostedt
2015-07-23 17:33                                   ` Jason Baron
2015-07-23 18:12                                     ` Steven Rostedt
2015-07-23 19:02                                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-23 17:35                                   ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-23 17:54                                   ` Borislav Petkov
2015-07-23 19:02                                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-24  5:29                                       ` Borislav Petkov
2015-07-24 10:36                                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-22 20:43                           ` Mikulas Patocka
2015-07-21 15:53                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-07-21 15:54                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-09 17:11       ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-09 19:15         ` Jason Baron
2015-07-14  9:35 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-07-14 12:43   ` Mikulas Patocka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150721154959.GS19282@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com \
    --cc=jasonbaron0@gmail.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vince@deater.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome