From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Jason Baron <jasonbaron0@gmail.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Vince Weaver <vince@deater.net>,
"hillf.zj" <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com>,
Valdis Kletnieks <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: Kernel broken on processors without performance counters
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 12:42:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150723104215.GH25159@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55AFCDA4.5010406@gmail.com>
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 01:06:44PM -0400, Jason Baron wrote:
> Ok,
>
> So we could add all 4 possible initial states, where the
> branches would be:
>
> static_likely_init_true_branch(struct static_likely_init_true_key *key)
> static_likely_init_false_branch(struct static_likely_init_false_key *key)
> static_unlikely_init_false_branch(struct static_unlikely_init_false_key *key)
> static_unlikely_init_true_branch(struct static_unlikely_init_true_key *key)
I'm sorely tempted to go quote cypress hill here...
And I realize part of the problem is that we're wanting to use jump
labels before we can patch them. But surely we can do better.
extern bool ____wrong_branch_error(void);
struct static_key_true;
struct static_key_false;
#define static_branch_likely(x) \
({ \
bool branch; \
if (__builtin_types_compatible_p(typeof(x), struct static_key_true)) \
branch = !arch_static_branch(&(x)->key); \
else if (__builtin_types_compatible_p(typeof(x), struct static_key_false)) \
branch = !arch_static_branch_jump(&(x)->key); \
else \
branch = ____wrong_branch_error(); \
branch; \
})
#define static_branch_unlikely(x) \
({ \
bool branch; \
if (__builtin_types_compatible_p(typeof(x), struct static_key_true)) \
branch = arch_static_branch(&(x)->key); \
else if (__builtin_types_compatible_p(typeof(x), struct static_key_false)) \
branch = arch_static_branch_jump(&(x)->key); \
else \
branch = ____wrong_branch_error(); \
branch; \
})
Can't we make something like that work?
So the immediate problem appears to be the 4 different key inits, which don't
seem very supportive of this separation:
+#define STATIC_KEY_LIKEY_INIT_TRUE ((struct static_unlikely_init_true_key) \
+ { .key.enabled = ATOMIC_INIT(1), \
+ .key.entries = (void *)JUMP_LABEL_TYPE_TRUE_BRANCH })
+#define STATIC_KEY_LIKEY_INIT_FALSE ((struct static_unlikely_init_false_key) \
+ { .key.enabled = ATOMIC_INIT(0), \
+ .key.entries = (void *)JUMP_LABEL_TYPE_TRUE_BRANCH })
+#define STATIC_KEY_UNLIKELY_INIT_TRUE ((struct static_unlikely_init_true_key) \
+ { .key.enabled = ATOMIC_INIT(1), \
+ .key.entries = (void *)JUMP_LABEL_TYPE_FALSE_BRANCH })
+#define STATIC_KEY_UNLIKELY_INIT_FALSE ((struct static_unlikely_init_false_key) \
+ { .key.enabled = ATOMIC_INIT(0), \
+ .key.entries = (void *)JUMP_LABEL_TYPE_FALSE_BRANCH })
But I think we can fix that by using a second __jump_table section, then
we can augment the LABEL_TYPE_{TRUE,FALSE} thing with the section we
find the jump_entry in.
Then we can do:
#define STATIC_KEY_TRUE_INIT (struct static_key_true) { .key = STATIC_KEY_INIT_TRUE, }
#define STATIC_KEY_FALSE_INIT (struct static_key_false){ .key = STATIC_KEY_INIT_FALSE, }
And invert the jump_label_type if we're in the second section.
I think we'll need a second argument to the arch_static_branch*()
functions to indicate which section it needs to go in.
static __always_inline bool arch_static_branch(struct static_key *key, bool inv)
{
if (!inv) {
asm_volatile_goto("1:"
".byte " __stringify(STATIC_KEY_INIT_NOP) "\n\t"
".pushsection __jump_table, \"aw\" \n\t"
_ASM_ALIGN "\n\t"
_ASM_PTR "1b, %l[l_yes], %c0 \n\t"
".popsection \n\t"
: : "i" (key) : : l_yes);
} else {
asm_volatile_goto("1:"
".byte " __stringify(STATIC_KEY_INIT_NOP) "\n\t"
".pushsection __jump_table_inv, \"aw\" \n\t"
_ASM_ALIGN "\n\t"
_ASM_PTR "1b, %l[l_yes], %c0 \n\t"
".popsection \n\t"
: : "i" (key) : : l_yes);
}
return false;
l_yes:
return true;
}
static __always_inline bool arch_static_branch_jump(struct static_key *key, bool inv)
{
if (!inv) {
asm_volatile_goto("1:"
"jmp %l[l_yes]\n\t"
".pushsection __jump_table, \"aw\" \n\t"
_ASM_ALIGN "\n\t"
_ASM_PTR "1b, %l[l_yes], %c0 \n\t"
".popsection \n\t"
: : "i" (key) : : l_yes);
} else {
asm_volatile_goto("1:"
"jmp %l[l_yes]\n\t"
".pushsection __jump_table_inv, \"aw\" \n\t"
_ASM_ALIGN "\n\t"
_ASM_PTR "1b, %l[l_yes], %c0 \n\t"
".popsection \n\t"
: : "i" (key) : : l_yes);
}
return false;
l_yes:
return true;
}
And change the branch macros thusly:
#define static_branch_likely(x) \
({ \
bool branch; \
if (__builtin_types_compatible_p(typeof(x), struct static_key_true)) \
branch = !arch_static_branch(&(x)->key, false); \
else if (__builtin_types_compatible_p(typeof(x), struct static_key_false)) \
branch = !arch_static_branch_jump(&(x)->key, true); \
else \
branch = ____wrong_branch_error(); \
branch; \
})
#define static_branch_unlikely(x) \
({ \
bool branch; \
if (__builtin_types_compatible_p(typeof(x), struct static_key_true)) \
branch = arch_static_branch(&(x)->key, true); \
else if (__builtin_types_compatible_p(typeof(x), struct static_key_false)) \
branch = arch_static_branch_jump(&(x)->key, false); \
else \
branch = ____wrong_branch_error(); \
branch; \
})
And I think it'll all work. Hmm?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-23 10:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-08 15:17 Mikulas Patocka
2015-07-08 16:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-08 16:54 ` Mikulas Patocka
2015-07-09 17:23 ` [PATCH] x86: Fix static_key in load_mm_cr4() Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-09 19:11 ` Mikulas Patocka
2015-07-10 8:27 ` [tip:perf/urgent] x86, perf: Fix static_key bug " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-08 17:37 ` Kernel broken on processors without performance counters Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-08 20:04 ` Jason Baron
2015-07-09 0:36 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-10 14:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-10 15:29 ` Jason Baron
2015-07-21 8:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-21 15:43 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-07-21 15:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-21 15:51 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-21 16:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-21 16:57 ` Jason Baron
2015-07-23 14:54 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-07-21 18:15 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-07-21 18:50 ` Jason Baron
2015-07-21 18:54 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-21 19:00 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2015-07-21 19:29 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-21 23:49 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2015-07-22 4:24 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-07-22 17:06 ` Jason Baron
2015-07-23 10:42 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2015-07-23 10:53 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-07-23 14:19 ` Jason Baron
2015-07-23 14:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-23 14:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-23 19:14 ` Jason Baron
2015-07-24 10:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-24 12:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-24 14:15 ` Jason Baron
2015-07-23 14:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-23 15:34 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-07-23 17:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-23 17:18 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-07-23 17:33 ` Jason Baron
2015-07-23 18:12 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-07-23 19:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-23 17:35 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-23 17:54 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-07-23 19:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-24 5:29 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-07-24 10:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-22 20:43 ` Mikulas Patocka
2015-07-21 15:53 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-07-21 15:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-09 17:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-09 19:15 ` Jason Baron
2015-07-14 9:35 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-07-14 12:43 ` Mikulas Patocka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150723104215.GH25159@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com \
--cc=jasonbaron0@gmail.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vince@deater.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome