Re: [PATCH V3 3/5] perf,tools: Dump per-sample freq/CPU%/CORE_BUSY% in report -D

[Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>]

On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 07:29:33AM -0400, kan.liang@intel.com wrote:

SNIP

>  
> -static void sample_read__printf(struct perf_sample *sample, u64 read_format)
> +static void sample_read__printf(struct perf_session *session,
> +				struct perf_evlist *evlist,
> +				struct perf_sample *sample,
> +				u64 read_format)
>  {
> +	struct perf_evsel *evsel;
> +	struct perf_sample_id *sid;
> +	u64 data[FREQ_PERF_MAX] = { 0 };
> +	u64 cpu_max_freq = session->header.env.cpu_attr[PERF_HEADER_CPU_MAX_FREQ];
> +
>  	printf("... sample_read:\n");
>  
>  	if (read_format & PERF_FORMAT_TOTAL_TIME_ENABLED)
> @@ -875,10 +883,26 @@ static void sample_read__printf(struct perf_sample *sample, u64 read_format)
>  			printf("..... id %016" PRIx64
>  			       ", value %016" PRIx64 "\n",
>  			       value->id, value->value);

should 2 hunks hunk below go under symbol_conf.show_freq_perf condition ?

jirka

> +
> +			sid = perf_evlist__id2sid(evlist, value->id);
> +			evsel = sid->evsel;
> +			if (evsel != NULL)
> +				SET_FREQ_PERF_VALUE(session->header.env.msr_pmu_type,
> +						    evsel, data, value->value);
>  		}
>  	} else
>  		printf("..... id %016" PRIx64 ", value %016" PRIx64 "\n",
>  			sample->read.one.id, sample->read.one.value);
> +
> +	if (HAS_FREQ(data))
> +		printf("..... Freq %lu MHz\n",
> +		       GET_FREQ(data, cpu_max_freq/1000));
> +	if (HAS_CPU_UTIL(data))
> +		printf("..... CPU%% %lu%%\n",
> +		       GET_CPU_UTIL(data));
> +	if (HAS_CORE_BUSY(data))
> +		printf("..... CORE_BUSY%% %lu%%\n",
> +		       GET_CORE_BUSY(data));
>  }
>  

SNIP